Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research
  • Open Access

Aspidosperma pyrifolium, a medicinal plant from the Brazilian caatinga, displays a high antiplasmodial activity and low cytotoxicity

  • 1,
  • 2,
  • 1,
  • 2,
  • 3Email author and
  • 1Email author
Malaria Journal201817:436

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-018-2568-y

  • Received: 21 June 2018
  • Accepted: 3 November 2018
  • Published:

Abstract

Background

Several species of Aspidosperma plants are referred to as remedies for the treatment of malaria, especially Aspidosperma nitidum. Aspidosperma pyrifolium, also a medicinal plant, is used as a natural anti-inflammatory. Its fractionated extracts were assayed in vitro for activity against malaria parasites and for cytotoxicity.

Methods

Aspidosperma pyrifolium activity was evaluated against Plasmodium falciparum using extracts in vitro. Toxicity towards human hepatoma cells, monkey kidney cells or human monocytes freshly isolated from peripheral blood was also assessed. Anti-malarial activity of selected extracts and fractions that presented in vitro activity were tested in mice with a Plasmodium berghei blood-induced infection.

Results

The crude stem bark extract and the alkaloid-rich and ethyl acetate fractions from stem extract showed in vitro activity. None of the crude extracts or fractions was cytotoxic to normal monkey kidney and to a human hepatoma cell lines, or human peripheral blood mononuclear cells; the MDL50 values of all the crude bark extracts and fractions were similar or better when tested on normal cells, with the exception of organic and alkaloidic-rich fractions from stem extract. Two extracts and two fractions tested in vivo caused a significant reduction of P. berghei parasitaemia in experimentally infected mice.

Conclusion

Considering the high therapeutic index of the alkaloidic-rich fraction from stem extract of A. pyrifolium, it makes the species a candidate for further investigation aiming to produce a new anti-malarial, especially considering that the active extract has no toxicity, i.e., no mutagenic effects in the genototoxicity assays, and that it has an in vivo anti-malarial effect. In its UPLC-HRMS analysis this fraction was shown to have two major components compatible with the bisindole alkaloid Leucoridine B, and a novel compound, which is likely to be responsible for the activity against malaria parasites demonstrated in in vitro tests.

Keywords

  • Aspidosperma pyrifolium
  • Plasmodium falciparum
  • Ethnopharmacology
  • Medicinal plants
  • Anti-malarial

Background

Resistance of Plasmodium parasites to classical drugs unfortunately now includes artemisinin derivatives, the latest weapon to fight malaria in areas of drug resistance [1]. First isolated from the Chinese medicinal plant Artemisia annua (sweet wormwood), artemisinin derivatives have a potent effect against drug-resistant parasites [2]. New drugs to fight malaria are needed due to the spread of Plasmodium falciparum resistant to available anti-malarial drugs [1, 3]. Plasmodium vivax, the species most prevalent in South America, also shows resistance to chloroquine, making malaria control more difficult [46].

The use of plants as medicines, a millennial tradition in Asian and African countries, has become common in the Western world as well [79]. One-third of adults use herbs as alternative therapy in their primary forms, or as plant mixtures claimed to be non-toxic even after long-term use [10]. Herbal remedies remain important to control malaria in poor, endemic areas [1115].

Various medicinal plant species used in Latin American countries against fever and/or malaria proved to be active when tested in vitro against malaria parasites and/or in experimentally infected mice [1524]. Among them are the plants of the Apocynaceae family, rich in monoterpene indole alkaloids, and active in vitro against P. falciparum [2532]. The Aspidosperma nitidum (Apocynaceae) stem bark used to treat fever and malaria in the Amazon region was active at low concentrations against P. falciparum and in mice infected with sensitive Plasmodium berghei parasites [29].

The species Aspidosperma pyrifolium, known in Brazil as pereiro, pereiro-preto or pereiro-do-sertão [33], grows widely in the Brazilian caatinga. Here, this species was submitted to chemical fractionation followed by biological tests against P. falciparum in vitro and P. berghei in mice, in parallel with tests of cytotoxicity in vitro.

Methods

Plant material

Plant collection and access to genetic resources were approved by CNPq (Process N°010861/2013-0) and registered in the National System for the Management of Genetic Heritage and Associated Traditional Knowledge (SisGen, Process N°A61DDB0 and N°A646A52, respectively).

Parts of A. pyrifolium (Fig. 1) were collected in São José da Tapera (Alagoas, Brazil) in October 2001; the leaves were collected in 2016 at the margins of São Francisco River. The species was identified by José Elias de Paula, from the Department of Botany (Universidade de Brasília, UNB), where a plant voucher is deposited (JEP 3686-UnB).
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Aspidosperma pyrifolium, a medicinal plant used as anti-inflammatory, known as pereiro in Brazil. A adult tree; B parts used for classification

Extract preparation and fractionation

Purification of A. pyrifolium crude stem bark extract was performed as previously described [33] (Fig. 2a). Briefly, the stem bark of the plant was air-dried at room temperature and ground to a course powder (2.5-mm mesh size) using a laboratory mill. The powdered material (3.0 kg) was extracted with 95% ethanol (5.5 l) in a Soxlet apparatus for 72 h, and then concentrated under reduced pressure in a rotary evaporator. The remaining water was removed using a freeze dryer yielding 147 g of crude stem bark extract (AP1) and kept at 4 °C until use. AP1 was dissolved in methanol, water was added (2:3) and the mixture was partitioned with ethyl acetate. The hydromethanolic phase was lyophilized producing 55 g of an alkaloid rich fraction (AP2), and the ethyl acetate phase was concentrated under pressure yielding 91 g of the AP3 fraction. The alkaloids were detected in silica gel TLC plates by spraying with Dragendorff reagent.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2

Fractionation workflow of the plant stem bark (a), and stem (b) extracts from Aspidosperma pyrifolium. The in vitro activity against P. falciparum (IC50) highlighted in bold represents the best results

The fractionation procedures of the stem extract are summarized in Fig. 2b. The isolated plant material was air-dried as described above; the powder was extracted with 95% ethanol and concentrated under reduced pressure yielding 147 g of extract (AP4). This extract was dissolved in water: methanol (2:3), and the mixture partitioned with ethyl acetate. The organic fraction (AP5) was solubilized in chloroform and partitioned with hydrochloric acid 0.1 M. The aqueous acidic phase was separated and adjusted to pH 10 with 1 M NaOH. The free base alkaloids were extracted with chloroform, producing an aqueous (AP5F.AQ) and an alkaloid-rich (AP5F.ALC) fraction. The aqueous phase was partitioned with butanol yielding an organic (AP6) and an aqueous (AP7) fraction. Dragendorff reagent was used to reveal the presence of alkaloids in TLC plates. The extracts and fractions obtained were further used in biological assays. Fractionation of the crude leaves, root and root bark extracts was as described above for the stem.

Ultra-performance chromatographic coupled to mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS)

The analyses were performed on a Nexera UHPLC-system (Shimadzu) hyphenated to a maXis ETD high-resolution ESI-QTOF mass spectrometer (Bruker) controlled by the Compass 1.5 software package (Bruker). Samples were diluted to final concentration of 5 mg/ml and 1 µl was injected on a Shimadzu Shim-Pack XR-ODS-III column (C18, 2.2 µm, 2.0 × 150 mm) at 40°C at a flow rate of 400 μl/min. An additional identical run was performed with 5 µl (50 µg) injected, with 200 µl fractions collected in each well of a microtitre plate. The mobile phases A and B (0.1% formic acid in distilled water and acetonitrile, respectively) were used to form an isocratic run of 5% B during the initial 5 min, followed by a linear gradient to 100% B in 40 min and a hold at 100% B for 5 min. The mass spectra were acquired in positive mode at a spectra rate of 2 Hz. Ion-source parameters were set to 500 V end plate offset, 4500 V capillary voltage, 3.0 bar nebulizer pressure, 8 l/min and 200 °C dry gas flow and temperature respectively. Data-dependent fragment spectra were recorded using a collision energy range between 15 and 60 eV. Ion cooler settings were optimized for an m/z 40–1000 range using a calibrant solution of 1 mM sodium formate in 50% 2-propanol. Mass calibration was achieved by initial ion-source infusion of 20 μl calibrant solution and post-acquisition recalibration of the raw data. Compound detection was performed by chromatographic peak dissection with subsequent formula determination according to exact mass and isotope pattern (MS1). Identification was based on comparison of compound fragment spectra (MS2) with reference spectra of an in-house database of standard compounds, the public spectra database MassBank [34], as well as in silico fragment spectra generated from the Universal Natural Product Database (UNPD-ISDB) [35]. The solvents were removed in a vacuum centrifuge at 45 °C before the P. falciparum assay described below.

Continuous cultures of Plasmodium falciparum

The blood forms of P. falciparum (W2 clone, chloroquine-resistant and mefloquine-sensitive) [36] were cultured as described [37]. After synchronization with sorbitol, the ring forms parasitized erythrocytes were used in tests of anti-parasite activity using the immune enzymatic assay with specific monoclonal antibodies to a parasite protein rich in histidine and alanine (HRPII), as described [38]. The antibodies were commercially acquired (MPFM55A and MPFM55P, ICLLAB, Portland, OR, USA). Endotoxin-free sterile disposables labware were used in all experiments.

The half-maximal drug inhibitory concentration (IC50) was estimated by curve fitting with the software Origin (OriginLab Corporation, USA) compared to parasite growth in drug-free medium. Fractions with IC50 values bellow 10 µg/ml were considered active; between 10 e 20 µg/ml as partially active, and above 20 µg/ml as inactive as demonstrated before [30, 31]. The chloroquine was used as anti-malarial control in all assays.

Cytotoxicity tests

The toxicity tests of plant extracts and fractions were performed against a monkey kidney cell line (BGM), a human hepatoma cell line (HepG2), and freshly isolated human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) collected from healthy volunteers (approved by Ethics Committee, Centro de Pesquisas René Rachou-FIOCRUZ, CAAE 03209212.7.0000.5091 at 10/03/2012). Cytotoxicity was evaluated by the MTT assay [(3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,2-diphenyltetrazolium)] as described [39]. The cell viability was expressed as the percentage of the control absorbance in the untreated cells after subtracting the background. The minimum lethal dose for 50% of the cells (MLD50) was determined as previously described [40]. The ratio between drug cytotoxicity (MLD50) and activity (IC50) was used to estimate the selective index (SI), or therapeutic activity as described for A. nitidum [29]. A SI ≤ 10 was indicative of toxicity.

Anti-malarial tests in vivo

Swiss outbred adult female mice (20 ± 2 g) were each inoculated intraperitoneally with 1 × 105 P. berghei (strain NK65)-infected red blood cells, as described before [29]. The mice were divided randomly in groups of 3–5 animals per cage and then treated by gavage for 3 consecutive days with 100 mg/kg of the fractions dissolved in DMSO 3% (v/v). Blood samples were collected from the mice tails on day 5 and 10 of infection, fixed with methanol, Giemsa stained and used for parasitaemia determination by microscopy. The extracts and fractions were evaluated in one test and the per cent reduction of parasitaemia calculated considering untreated mice parasitaemia as 100%, the leaves extract was tested three times. Drugs reducing parasitaemia by 40% or more were considered active; reductions between 20 and 40% partially active, and reductions below 20% inactive as demonstrated before [29]. Mice mortality was monitored daily until day 30 post-infection. The chloroquine was used as anti-malarial control at a sub-curative dose of 20 mg/kg. The protocol for animal use was approved by the Ethics Committee at FIOCRUZ (CEUA LW-23/13 at 05/20/2013).

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using Prism 5.0 (GraphPad Software, Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA). The survival of the treated mice when compared to control mice control was analysed using the Kruskal–Wallis rank sum test. Statistical significance was defined as P values ≤ 0.05.

Mutageniticity and genotoxicity tests

The potential of the active alkaloid fraction from the plant stem to induce mutagenic and genotoxic effects in vitro was evaluated with Ames tests [41] performed at the Genotox-Royal Institute (Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil), contract number GT00748. Five strains of Salmonella typhimurium with several specially constructed mutants were tested in the presence of various drug concentrations in the absence and presence of the metabolizing rat liver fraction for the ability of a given extract or fraction to induce mutations.

Results

In vitro assays

The A. pyrifolium extracts and fractions were not toxic at the highest doses tested against the BGM cells (MLD50 ≥ 1000 µg/ml), except for the crude extracts from root bark and leaves (MLD50 = 287 to 486 µg/ml). Some toxicity to HepG2 cells and to PBMC freshly collected also occurred with most extracts and fractions of the crude stem and stem extracts (Table 1).
Table 1

Cytotoxicity (MLD50) and activity (IC50) in vitro against Plasmodium falciparum of Aspidosperma pyrifolium extracts and fractions

Plant material (code)a

MLD50 (µg/ml)b

IC 50 c (µg/ml)

Activity

BGM

HepG2

PBMC

Crude extracts

 Stem bark (AP1)

≥ 1000

410 ± 67

≥ 1000

3 ± 3

AT

 Stem (AP4)

≥ 1000

415 ± 17

404 ± 42

17 ± 4

PA

 Root bark (AP9)

287 ± 35

407 ± 60

492 ± 75

14 ± 1

PA

 Roots (AP12)

≥ 1000

415 ± 17

404 ± 42

18 ± 5

PA

 Leaves

486 ± 15

449 ± 49

548 ± 22

12 ± 4

PA

Fractions from AP1

 Organic (ethyl acetate) (AP3)

≥ 1000

489 ± 13

435 ± 83

9 ± 3

AT

 Aqueous (AP2)

≥ 1000

636 ± 55

≥ 1000

20 ± 6

PA

Fractions from AP4

 Organic (ethyl acetate) (AP5)

≥ 1000

316 ± 42

153 ± 13

6 ± 1

AT

 Alkaloid-rich (AP5F.ALC)

≥ 1000

418 ± 7

145 ± 17

5 ± 3

AT

 Aqueous (AP5F.AQ)

≥ 1000

≥ 1000

≥ 1000

≥ 50

IN

 Butanolic (AP6)

≥ 1000

≥ 1000

≥ 1000

≥ 40

IN

 Aqueous (AP7)

≥ 1000

≥ 1000

≥ 1000

27 ± 3

IN

 Chloroquine

457 ± 22

398 ± 12

150 ± 53

0.07 ± 0.02

AT

AT active, PA partially active, IN inactive

aThe fractionation steps are summarized in Fig. 2

bMLD for 50% of hepatoma cells (HepG2), monkey kidney cells (BGM) or freshly isolated human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) in three or four tests with MTT

cIC50 correspond to the concentration inhibiting 50% growth of blood forms of P. falciparum (W2 clone, chloroquine-resistant) in 3–5 independent assays

Among 5 crude extracts (from stem, roots, leaves) and 7 different fractions tested against P. falciparum chloroquine-resistant parasites, the best in vitro activity was shown by the crude stem bark extract (AP1) (IC50 = 3 µg/ml). This was followed by the alkaloid fraction AP5F.ALC (IC50 = 5 µg/ml) and the organic fraction (AP5) (IC50 = 6 µg/ml) both from the crude stem extract. The stem (AP4), root bark (AP9), roots (AP12) and leaves extracts, and the aqueous fraction (AP2) from stem bark extract were all partially active; all other fractions were inactive (Table 1). Chloroquine was used as positive control in all assays.

None of the crude extracts or fractions was cytotoxic to HepG2, BGM or human peripheral blood mononuclear cells; the MDL50 values of all the crude bark extracts and fractions were similar or better when tested on normal cells, with the exception of AP5 and AP5F.ALC fractions (Table 1).

The ratio between in vitro cytotoxicity and activity or selectivity index (SI) was highest for the crude stem bark (AP1) regardless of the source of cells used to evaluate toxicity in vitro, varying from 137 to 333 (Table 2). The organic (ethyl acetate) fractions from stem bark (AP3), stem (AP5), and the alkaloid-rich fraction (AP5F.ALC) from stem extract (AP4) showed toxicity to the BGM cell line only, with high specific activity to P. falciparum reflected in SI values of 111 (AP3), 167 (AP5) and 200 (AP5F.ALC).
Table 2

Selectivity indexes of extracts and fractions of Aspidosperma pyrifolium to three types of cells

Plant extract and fractions (code)

SI (MLD50/IC50)a

HepG2

BGM

PBMC

Stem bark (AP1)

137

333

333

Aqueous (AP2)

32

50

50

Organic (ethyl acetate) (AP3)

54

111

48

Stem (AP4)

24

59

24

Organic (ethyl acetate) (AP5)

53

167

26

Alkaloid-rich (AP5F.ALC)

84

200

29

Root bark (AP9)

29

21

21

Root (AP12)

23

56

22

Leaves

41

37

46

aMLD50 and IC50 are shown in Table 1. SI was calculated only for the active samples

When evaluated by the Ames test, the alkaloidic-rich fraction (AP5FALC) did not induce reverse mutation in the TA100, TA98, TA97a, TA102 and TA1535 strains of S. typhimurium up to the concentration of 40 μg/plate tested in the absence and up to the concentration of 5000 μg/plate in the presence of liver metabolizing fraction of mouse, induced by Aroclor 1254 (-S9).

Anti-malarial tests

The extracts from the root bark (AP9), root (AP12) and leaves, which were available in sufficient amounts, were also evaluated in mice for their anti-malarial activity. Oral administration (100 mg/kg) of the crude root extract (AP12) for 3 consecutive days reduced P. berghei parasitaemia by 75 and 52% on the 5th and 10th days of infection, respectively (Table 3), and by 79% when animals were treated by the crude root bark extract (AP9) on the 5th day. The leaves extract resulted on slightly reduced parasitaemia. The aqueous fraction AP2 (derived from AP1) caused a 93 and 57% reduction on 5th and 10th days of infection; the alkaloid fraction AP5F.ALC (derived from AP4) caused 79 and 57% reduction at both time points. Chloroquine, the standard anti-malarial, was tested in parallel each time at 20 mg/kg. Other samples that presented activity in vitro were not tested in vivo due to insufficient mass amounts available.
Table 3

Anti-malarial activity of Aspidosperma pyrifolium against Plasmodium berghei in mice

Crude extracts and fractions (code)

% Reductiona

Day 5

Day 10

Extracts

 Root bark (AP9)

79

29

 Root (AP12)

75

52

 Leaves

23

40

Fractions

 Aqueous (AP2)

93

57

 Organic (ethyl acetate) (AP3)

0

34

 Alkaloid-rich (AP5F.ALC)

79

57

 Chloroquineb

100

100

aReduction in parasitaemia compared to control infected non-treated mice; > 40% = active; 20–40% partially active; < 20% inactive. Results from one test, with exception of leaves extract that was tested three times

bChloroquine was tested at 20 mg/kg

LC–MS/MS analysis

The remaining few milligrams of AP5F.ALC were analysed on an UPLC coupled with a HRMSMS equipment. The fractions collected after the injection of 50 mg in a reversed phase analytical column were assayed in vitro against P. falciparum. The two fractions that eluted between 19.5 and 20.5 min (Fig. 3a, b) were active in the bioassay. The m/z profile of this region (Fig. 3c) showed that these fractions were composed of two major components, A and B, exhibiting [M+H]+ ions with m/z of 555.3488 and 627.3698, compatible with molecular formulas C38H42N4 and C41H46N4O2, respectively.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3

Data generated by LC–MS/MS analysis of the Aspidosperma pyrifolium alkaloid fraction. a Full chromatogram of AP5-Falc; b detail showing peaks of the active fractions (19.5–20.5 min); c principal ions detected in the active fractions; d MS2 of the double-charged ion 278.1789; e MS2 of the double-charged ion 314.1892; f detail of the region m/z 280–320 of E

Discussion

Herbal remedies and medicinal plants are important in remote areas where poor communities have little access to effective anti-malarial drugs [11]. Plants with confirmed biological activity and standardized crude herbal medicines used alone or combined with synthetic drugs represent complementary treatments and may help to inhibit the development of drug resistant parasites [42].

The A. nitidum species is popularly used to treat fever and/or malaria in the Brazilian Amazon [29]; various species of Aspidosperma have anti-P. falciparum activity [13, 25, 27, 2932, 43]. Aspidosperma pyrifolium is used in some areas to treat inflammation of the urinary tract and dermatitis [44]; the anti-inflammatory effect of their seeds was also observed in a model of Parkinson’s disease [45], but not as an anti-malarial, although alkaloids isolated from A. pyrifolium have already demonstrated antiplasmodial activity [46]. Such effect is herein demonstrated for the first time, together with low toxicity to cell lines and to fresh human PBMC. This is an important finding because some plant fractions showed high selectivity towards P. falciparum. The anti-inflammatory effect described for A. pyrifolium [45] might be useful in severe malaria treatment in which an aberrant inflammatory reaction results from the host immune response to the parasites with deleterious consequences like vascular activation and dysfunction [47]. In addition, an effective immunomodulatory therapy might improve clinical outcome and decrease long-term neurological sequelae [48].

Previous work with A. pyrifolium foliage or with the entire plant has demonstrated its toxicity to goats, sheep and cattle resulting in abortion, premature birth and damage to rat embryos [44, 49, 50]; the plant stem bark, fruit and roots were toxic to larvae of Plutella xylostella [51]. In addition, all such fractions (Table 1) showed low in vitro cytotoxicity. However, this toxicity was not observed in animals used in the Parkinson’s disease model [45]. Furthermore, the most promising fraction (AP5F.ALC) from the crude stem extract, based in the IC50 and SI values, showed no increased potential for mutagenicity and genotoxicity as judged by the Ames test.

The high selectivity index of A. pyrifolium was comparable to that of other species of Aspidosperma published before [2931]. Aspidosperma pyrifolium was the second-best species for in vitro activity against malaria parasites, only preceded by A. nitidum, a species highly used as anti-malarial treatment in Brazilian malaria-endemic areas [29]. The two other species Aspidosperma olivaceum [30] and Aspidosperma ramiflorum [31] showed higher toxicities, resulting in lower selectivity indexes when compared to A. pyrifolium.

Experimental studies with artemisinin-derived drugs have shown regulation of the innate and adaptive immunity inflammatory reactions [52]. It has been well documented that a disproportionate body inflammatory response to blood stage parasites causes severe malaria, resulting in high morbidity during acute infections [53], indicating that the immune system plays an important role in limiting parasite density in malaria [54]. Whether the anti-inflammatory action of A. pyrifolium is responsible for its anti-malarial effect in rodent malaria is yet to be demonstrated.

UPLC-HRMS analysis of AP5-FALC showed the presence of two major components in the active fraction, for which the molecular formulas C38H42N4 and C41H46N4O2, were proposed. A literature search in the Chemical Abstracts database looking for compounds with molecular formula C38H42N4 (compound A) retrieved only the bisindole alkaloid Leucoridine B, which was previously isolated from the stem-bark extract of Leuconotis griffithii, a species belonging to the Apocynaceae family [55]. Indeed, analysis of the HRMS-MS spectra of A (Figs. 3d and 4) showed a fragmentation pattern that is compatible with the Leucoridine B structure. The proposed fragmentation can explain the major signals detected in the MS2 spectra of this component of the mixture, namely the ions with m/z 303.1861 and 253.1405.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4

Putative fragmentation of compound A (Leucoridine B)

In contrast, no natural product with the formula C41H46N4O2 could be found, indicating that component B may be a novel compound. Its molecular formula and the presence of the fragment ion with m/z 303.1861 (Figs. 4 and 5) indicate that it may have a structure related to that of A. The observation of an ion with m/z 585.3593 was interpreted as a loss of a CH2CO moiety, probably from an acetylated nitrogen. The presence of a methoxy group in an aromatic ring sums up to the calculated formula for the ion C41H47N4O2+ with m/z 627.3698. To explain the ions with m/z 303.1861 and 283.1810, both new substituents must be on the same half of the bis-indole structure, explaining the ion with m/z 283.1830. Unfortunately, there was only 2 mg of AP5F.ALC left for this study and the confirmation of the proposed structures will require isolation of larger amounts of A and B for their unequivocal identification.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5

Putative fragmentation of the molecular ion for the proposed compound B (Leucoridine E). The methoxy and acetyl group positions are not defined

Conclusion

The A. pyrifolium was the second-best Aspidosperma species for in vitro activity against malaria parasites, only preceded by A. nitidum, a species highly used as anti-malarial treatment in Brazilian malaria-endemic areas [29]. The two other species A. olivaceum [30] and A. ramiflorum [31] showed higher toxicities, resulting in lower selectivity indexes when compared to A. pyrifolium. This plant species is likely to be useful for further development of an anti-malarial drug, but supplementary chemical and pharmacological studies are still needed.

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

IPC performed the biological in vitro and in vivo assays, and statistical analysis; CLZ performed the fractionation and chemical analysis of LC–MS and MS; FJBF performed the biological in vivo tests; MK performed the LC–MS and MS tests; AEGS carried out the extraction, fractionation and isolation of the compounds; AUK was the project leader, conceived and led the study. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

To RENORBIO for fellowships at Universidade Federal de Alagoas; to IRR for providing logistics and facilities; to Dr. José Elias de Paula, University of Brasília, DF, Brazil for plant identification. To CNPq for fellowships of JJBF and AUK.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Availability of data and materials

All data and solutions used are available for consultants in the Instituto René Rachou, FIOCRUZ-MG, on records books.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The protocol for Human Research was approved by the Ethics Committee, Centro de Pesquisas René Rachou-FIOCRUZ, CAAE 03209212.7.0000.5091 at 10/03/2012); the protocol for animal use was approved by the Ethic Committee at FIOCRUZ (CEUA LW-23/13 at 05/20/2013). The registered numbers in the National System for the management of Genetic Heritage and Associated Traditional Knowledge (SisGen) is A61DDB0 and A646A52, respectively.

Funding

This work was supported by the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico financial Projects (MCT/CNPq/CT-Saúde/MS/SCTIE/DECIT N°034/2008 Edital Doenças Negligenciadas—N° 575746/2008-4; Edital MCT/CNPq/MS/SCTIE/DECIT/FAPs/Nº09/2009 PRONEX-REDE MALÁRIA—N° 555675/2009-2; Edital PAPES VII/FIOCRUZ—N° 401842/2015-0), and for the authors fellowships.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Experimental and Human Malaria Section, Instituto René Rachou, FIOCRUZ, Belo Horizonte, MG, 30.190-009, Brazil
(2)
Chemistry of Natural Products Section, Instituto René Rachou, FIOCRUZ, Belo Horizonte, MG, 30.190-009, Brazil
(3)
Centro de Ciências Agrárias, Universidade Federal de Alagoas, Maceió, AL, 57072-900, Brazil

References

  1. WHO. Global Malaria Programme, Status report: artemisinin and artemisinin-based combination therapy resistance. WHO/HTM/GMP/2017. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2017. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/255213/WHO-HTM-GMP-2017.9-eng.pdf;jsessionid=6676CE7F337B05F87213532C21F4D7AC?sequence=1. Accessed 2 Apr 2018.
  2. Tu Y. Artemisinin—a gift from traditional Chinese medicine to the World (Nobel Lecture). Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2016;55:10210–26.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Noedl H, Se Y, Schaecher K, Smith BL, Socheat D, Fukuda MM. Evidence of artemisinin-resistant malaria in western Cambodia. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:2619–20.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Gonçalves LA, Cravo P, Ferreira UM. Emerging Plasmodium vivax resistance to chloroquine in South America: an overview. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2014;109:534–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Marques MM, Costa MR, Santana Filho FS, Vieira JL, Nascimento MT, Brasil LW, et al. Plasmodium vivax chloroquine resistance and anemia in the western Brazilian Amazon. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2014;58:342–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Price RN, Von Seidlein L, Valecha N, Nosten F, Baird JK, White NJ. Global extent of chloroquine-resistant Plasmodium vivax: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2014;14:982–91.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Krettli AU, Adebayo JO, Krettli LG. Testing of natural products and synthetic molecules aiming at new antimalarials. Curr Drug Targets. 2009;10:261–70.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Willcox M, Benoit-Vical F, Fowler D, Bourdy G, Burford G, Giani S, et al. Do ethnobotanical and laboratory data predict clinical safety and efficacy of anti-malarial plants? Malar J. 2011;10(Suppl 1):S7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Oliveira DR, Krettli AU, Aguiar ACC, Leitão GG, Vieira MN, Martins KS, et al. Ethnopharmacological survey and biological evaluation of medicinal plants used against malaria by Quilombola communities from Oriximiná, Brazil. J Ethnopharmacol. 2015;173:424–34.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Zhou S, Koh H-L, Gong Z-Y, Lee EJD. Herbal bioactivation: the good, the bad and the ugly. Life Sci. 2004;74:935–68.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Willcox ML, Bodeker G. Traditional herbal medicines for malaria. BMJ. 2004;329:1156–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Bourdy G, Willcox ML, Ginsburg H, Rasoanaivo P, Graz B, Deharo E. Ethnopharmacology and malaria: new hypothetical leads or old efficient antimalarials? Int J Parasitol. 2008;38:33–41.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Oliveira AB, Dolabela MF, Braga FC, Jácome RL, Varotti FP, Póvoa MM. Plant-derived antimalarial agents: new leads and efficient phythomedicines. Part I. Alkaloids. An Acad Bras Cienc. 2009;81:715–40.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Adebayo JO, Krettli AU. Potential antimalarials from Nigerian plants: a review. J Ethnopharmacol. 2011;133:289–302.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Lima RB, Rocha e Silva LF, Melo MR, Costa JS, Picanço NS, Lima ES, et al. In vitro and in vivo anti-malarial activity of plants from the Brazilian Amazon. Malar J. 2015;14:508.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Dominguez JA. Malaria treatment with Aspidosperma quebracho blanco. Rev Farm. 1932;73:82.Google Scholar
  17. Carvalho LH, Krettli AU. Antimalarial chemotherapy with natural products and chemically defined molecules. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 1991;86(Suppl 2):181–4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Brandão MG, Grandi TS, Rocha EM, Sawyer DR, Krettli AU. Survey of medicinal plants used as antimalarials in the Amazon. J Ethnopharmacol. 1992;36:175–82.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Muñoz V, Sauvain M, Bourdy G, Arrázola S, Callapa J, Ruiz G, et al. A search for natural bioactive compounds in Bolivia through a multidisciplinary approach. Part III. Evaluation of the antimalarial activity of plants used by Alteños Indians. J Ethnopharmacol. 2000;71:123–31.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Krettli AU, Andrade-Neto VF, Brandão MG, Ferrari WM. The search for new antimalarial drugs from plants used to treat fever and malaria or plants randomly selected: a review. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2001;96:1033–42.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Bourdy G, Oporto P, Gimenez A, Deharo E. A search for natural bioactive compounds in Bolivia through a multidisciplinary approach. Part VI. Evaluation of the antimalarial activity of plants used by Isoceño-Guaraní Indians. J Ethnopharmacol. 2004;93:269–77.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Garavito G, Rincón J, Arteaga L, Hata Y, Bourdy G, Gimenez A, et al. Antimalarial activity of some Colombian medicinal plants. J Ethnopharmacol. 2006;107:460–2.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Botsaris AS. Plants used traditionally to treat malaria in Brazil: the archives of Flora Medicinal. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2007;3:18.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Krettli AU. Antimalarial drug discovery: screening of Brazilian medicinal plants and purified compounds. Expert Opin Drug Discov. 2009;4:95–108.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Andrade-Neto VF, Pohlit AM, Pinto AC, Silva EC, Nogueira KL, Melo MR, et al. In vitro inhibition of Plasmodium falciparum by substances isolated from Amazonian antimalarial plants. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2007;102:359–65.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Mariath IR, Falcão HS, Barbosa-Filho JM, Sousa LCF, Tomaz ACA, Batista LM, et al. Plants of the American continent with antimalarial activity. Braz J Pharmacogn. 2009;19:158–92.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Dolabela MF, Oliveira SG, Peres JM, Nascimento JMS, Póvoa MM, Oliveira AB. In vitro antimalarial activity of six Aspidosperma species from the state of Minas Gerais (Brazil). An Acad Bras Cienc. 2012;84:899–910.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Pérez NM, Torrico FB, Morales A. Acute toxicity, anticonceptive activity and indole alkaloids of aqueous extract from bark of Aspidosperma cuspa (Kunth) Blake. J Ethnopharmacol. 2012;2012(143):599–603.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Coutinho JP, Aguiar ACC, Santos PA, Lima JC, Rocha MGL, Santana AEG, et al. Aspidosperma (Apocynaceae) plant cytotoxicity and activity towards malaria parasites. Part I: Aspidosperma nitidum (Benth) used as a remedy to treat fever and malaria in the Amazon. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2013;108:974–82.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Chierrito TPC, Aguiar ACC, Andrade IM, Ceravolo IP, Gonçalves RAC, Oliveira AJB, et al. Anti-malarial activity of indole alkaloids isolated from Aspidosperma olivaceum. Malar J. 2014;13:142.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Aguiar ACC, Cunha AC, Ceravolo IP, Correia Gonçalves RA, Oliveira AJB, Krettli AU. Aspidosperma (Apocynaceae) plant cytotoxicity and activity towards malaria parasites. Part II: experimental studies with Aspidosperma ramiflorum in vivo and in vitro. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2015;110:906–13.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Dolabela MF, Póvoa MM, Brandão GC, Rocha FD, Soares LF, de Paula RC, et al. Aspidosperma species as sources of anti-malarials: uleine is the major anti-malarial indole alkaloid from Aspidosperma parvifolium (Apocynaceae). Malar J. 2015;13(Suppl 1):498.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Araújo-Junior JX, Antheaume C, Trindade RCP, Schmitt M, Bourguignon J-J, Sant’Ana AEG. Isolation and characterisation of the monoterpenoid indole alkaloids of Aspidosperma pyrifolium. Phytochem Rev. 2007;6:183–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Horai H, Arita M, Kanaya S, Nihei Y, Ikeda T, Suwa K, et al. MassBank: a public repository for sharing mass spectral data for life sciences. J Mass Spectrom. 2010;45:703–14.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Allard PM, Péresse T, Bisson J, Gindro K, Marcourt L, Pham VC, et al. Integration of molecular networking and in silico MS/MS fragmentation for natural products dereplication. Anal Chem. 2016;88:3317–23.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Oduola AM, Milhous WK, Weatherly NF, Bowdre JH, Desjardins RE. Plasmodium falciparum: induction of resistance to mefloquine in cloned strains by continuous drug exposure in vitro. Exp Parasitol. 1998;67:354–60.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Trager W, Jensen JB. Human malaria parasites in continuous culture. Science. 1976;193:673–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Noedl H, Wernsdorfer WH, Miller RS, Wongsrichanalai C. Histidine rich protein II, a novel approach to antimalarial drug susceptibility testing. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2002;46:1658–64.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Denizot F, Lang R. Rapid colorimetric assay for cell growth and survival. Modifications to the tetrazolium dye procedure giving improved sensitivity and reliability. J Immunol Methods. 1986;89:271–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. do Céu de Madureira M, Paula Martins A, Gomes M, Paiva J, Proença da Cunha A, Rosário V. Antimalarial activity of medicinal plants used in traditional medicine in S. Tomé and Príncipe islands. J Ethnopharmacol. 2002;81:23–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Ames BN, McCann J, Yamasaky E. Methods for detecting carcinogens and mutagens with the Salmonella/mammalian-microsome mutagenicity test. Mutat Res. 1975;31:347–64.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Rasoanaivo P, Wright CW, Willcox ML, Gilbert B. Whole plant extracts versus single compounds for the treatment of malaria: synergy and positive interactions. Malar J. 2011;10(Suppl 1):S4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Mitaine AC, Mesbah K, Richard B, Petermann C, Arrazola S, Moretti C, et al. Alkaloids from Aspidosperma species from Bolivia. Planta Med. 1996;62:458–61.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Agra MF, Baracho GS, Nurit K, Basílio IJ, Coelho VP. Medicinal and poisonous diversity of the flora of “Cariri Paraibano”, Brazil. J Ethnopharmacol. 2007;4:383–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. de Araújo DP, Nogueira PCN, Santos ADC, Costa RO, de Lucena JD, Jataí Gadelha-Filho CV, et al. Aspidosperma pyrifolium Mart: neuroprotective, antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects in a Parkinson’s disease model in rats. J Pharm Pharmacol. 2018;70:787–96.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Mitaine-Offer AC, Sauvain M, Valentin A, Callapa J, Mallié M, Zèches-Hanrot M. Antiplasmodial activity of aspidosperma indole alkaloids. Phytomedicine. 2002;9:142–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. Higgins SJ, Kain KC, Liles WC. Immunopathogenesis of falciparum malaria: implications for adjunctive therapy in the management of severe and cerebral malaria. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2011;9:803–19.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. White NJ, Turner GD, Medana IM, Dondorp AM, Day NP. The murine cerebral malaria phenomenon. Trends Parasitol. 2010;26:11–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. Lima MCJS, Soto-Blanco B. Poisoning in goats by Aspidosperma pyrifolium Mart.: biological and cytotoxic effects. Toxicon. 2010;55:320–4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  50. Riet-Correa F, Medeiros RMT, Schild AL. A review of poisonous plants that cause reproductive failure and malformations in the ruminants of Brazil. J Appl Toxicol. 2012;32:245–54.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  51. Trindade RCP, Silva PP, Araújo-Júnior JX, Lima IS, Paula JE, Santana EG. Mortality of Plutella xylostella larvae treated with Aspidosperma pyrifolium ethanol extracts. Pesq Agropec Bras. 2008;43:1813–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  52. Hou L, Huang H. Immune suppressive properties of artemisinin family drugs. Pharmacol Ther. 2016;166:123–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  53. Schofield L, Grau GE. Immunological processes in malaria pathogenesis. Nat Rev Immunol. 2005;5:722–35.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  54. Stevenson MM, Riley EM. Innate immunity to malaria. Nat Rev Immunol. 2004;4:169–80.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  55. Gan CY, Etoh T, Hayashi M, Komiyama K, Kam TS. Leucoridines A–D, cytotoxic Strychnos-Strychnos bisindole alkaloids from Leuconotis. J Nat Prod. 2010;73:1107–11.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2018

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate. Please note that comments may be removed without notice if they are flagged by another user or do not comply with our community guidelines.

Advertisement