Skip to main content

The role of complement immune response on artemisinin-based combination therapy in a population from malaria endemic region of Western Kenya

Abstract

Background

Naturally acquired immunity (NAI), which is characterized by protection against overt clinical disease and high parasitaemia, is acquired with age and transmission intensity. The role of NAI on the efficacy of anti-malarial drugs, including artemisinin-based combinations used as the first-line treatment for uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum, has not been fully demonstrated. This study investigated the role of NAI in response to artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT), in symptomatic patients living in western Kenya, a high malaria transmission area.

Methods

Sera samples from malaria immune participants (n = 105) in a therapeutic efficacy study were assessed for in vitro growth inhibitory activity against the 3D7 strain of P. falciparum using a fluorescent-based growth inhibition assay (GIA). Participants’ age and parasite clearance parameters were used in the analysis. Pooled sera from malaria naïve participants (n = 6) with no Plasmodium infection from malaria non-endemic regions of Kenya was used as negative control.

Results

The key observations of the study were as follows: (1) Sera with intact complement displayed higher GIA activity at lower (1%) serum dilutions (p < 0.0001); (2) there was significant relationship between GIA activity, parasite clearance rate (p = 0.05) and slope half-life (p = 0.025); and (3) age was a confounding factor when comparing the GIA activity with parasite clearance kinetics.

Conclusion

This study demonstrates for the first time there is synergy of complement, pre-existing immunity, and drug treatment in younger patients with symptomatic malaria in a high-transmission area.

Background

People living in malaria endemic areas acquire natural immunity with age, with faster rates of acquisition occurring in high compared to low transmission settings [1]. Both humoral and cell-mediated immune responses are involved in generating effective immunity [2], with individuals who possess greater breadth of immunological responses being at a lower risk of developing overt clinical symptoms [3].

Naturally acquired immunity has been shown to influence malaria drug treatment outcomes by enhancing the efficacy of sub-optimal drug regimen and delaying the emergence of drug resistance, including the artemisinin-based combinations used as the first-line treatment of Plasmodium falciparum in most malaria endemic countries [4]. Artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT) is still highly efficacious in sub-Saharan Africa (sSA) [5], but as malaria transmission reduces, and malaria immunity at population level wanes [6], the efficacy of ACT is likely to be impacted. It is, therefore, important to monitor and assess the effect of pre-existing acquired immunity on the efficacy of ACT as part of therapeutic efficacy studies (TESs).

Complement factors have been shown to play a key role in antibody-mediated immunity to malaria in humans [7]. Studies from malaria endemic areas have demonstrated that P. falciparum exposure is associated with growth-inhibitory activity in total [8], and merozoite surface protein 1 (MSP-1) or apical membrane antigen 1 (AMA-1)-specific IgG fractions [9, 10]. Growth inhibition assays (GIA) assesses the functional activity of sera to reduce/inhibit red blood cell (RBC) invasion and/or intra-RBC growth of P. falciparum in vitro [11]. Using GIA, the present study aimed to assess the role of complement and pre-existing immunity in the response to malaria drug treatment in symptomatic patients living in a malaria high-transmission area of western Kenya.

Methods

Study site, population and sample collection

This is a sub-study that analysed samples from a TES conducted in Kombewa district hospital in Kisumu County, western Kenya from June 2013 through November 2014. Detailed clinical study will be reported elsewhere. Briefly, Kisumu County is a malaria holoendemic lake region with intense malaria transmission through-out the year, with annual entomological inoculation rates (EIR) of 31.1 infected bite per year [12]. This was a two-arm, randomized open-label study, where patients presenting with uncomplicated malaria at the Kombewa district hospital between the ages of 6 months to 65 years were recruited (Table 1). Study participants were randomized to receive artemether-lumefantrine (AL) or artesunate-mefloquine (ASMQ) using block randomization schemes with varying block sizes. Venous blood samples were collected at hours 0, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24 and then every 6 h until two consecutive smears became negative. Giemsa-stained films were prepared following World Health Organization (WHO) guidance and read by two independent expert microscopists. The geometric mean of the parasite count per microlitre from each participant at each sampling time point was then calculated. Participants were followed for a total of 42 days. A total of 118 participants were enrolled in the study, 59 from each arm. From these, 105 blood samples from study participants (46 participants who were < 5 years of age and 59 who were ≥ 5 years of age) herein regarded as immune sera sample were successfully analysed using the GIA.

Table 1 Demographic information for the study participants

Pooled sera from six adult males 18–65 years old, who were P. falciparum negative, confirmed by microscopy and polymerase chain reaction (PCR), were used as non-immune control for the GIA experiments. These donors had blood groups A, B and O, and haemoglobin level of ≥ 13 g/dL, living in malaria non-endemic regions (Kericho and Nairobi), with no travel history to malaria endemic areas of Kenya in the last 6 months prior to blood donation. For the maintenance of the parasite culture and performing the GIA assays, red blood cells (RBCs) were obtained from blood group “O” donors, ages between 18 and 50 years, with haemoglobin level of 14–18 g/dL for males, and 12–16 g/dL for females living in a malaria non-endemic area (Kericho and Nairobi) with no travel history to malaria endemic areas in the last 6 months prior to donating blood. After collection, the blood was kept in cool boxes containing 2–8 °C ice parks with portable thermometers, which were safely transported to the central lab by courier service provider under monitored cold chain within 24 h. The cold chain, and sample integrity including absence of lysis and leakage was verified by the receiving technician and documented in the laboratory record book prior to processing as previously described [13]. Briefly, in 15 mL centrifuge tubes, 7 mL aliquots of the whole blood were added to 7 mL wash medium and then centrifuged at 800g for 10 min where most white blood cells (WBCs) in buffy coat were gently aspirated, followed by the entire supernatant, leaving the packed RBCs. The process was repeated three-time to remove all the remaining WBCs. The cells were then suspended in equivalent wash medium at 50% haematocrit (packed cells/wash medium v/v), then stored at 2–8 °C.

Culture media

Culture medium used to maintain P. falciparum in vitro (Life technologies, Carlsbad, CA) was prepared as previously described [14]. Briefly, basic media comprised of 10.4 g RPMI powder (Invitrogen, Inc., Carlsbad, California, USA) combined with 2 g of glucose (Sigma Inc., St Louis, Missouri, USA) and 5.95 g HEPES (Sigma, USA) dissolved to homogeneity in 1 litre of de-ionized water and sterilized with a 0.2 µM filter. RPMI 1640 tissue culture media (TCM), for all parasite culture and drug dilutions, consisted of RPMI 1640 basic media with 0.5% Albumax II (Gibco, Grand Island, NY), 3.2% (vol/vol) sodium bicarbonate (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, Massachusetts, USA) and 4 µg/mL hypoxanthine (Sigma Inc., St Louis, Missouri, USA). Complete RPMI 1640 media was stored at 2–8 °C. Serum free media consisted of 1.0 mL of 1.45 mM sterile hypoxanthine to 43.4 mL of RPMI basic medium, 1.6 mL of sterile sodium bicarbonate (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, Massachusetts, USA), 7.5% and sterilized with 0.2 µM filter then put in 2–8 °C. 10% complete media for Control was prepared by adding 5 mL of serum to 43.4 mL of RPMI basic medium, 1.0 mL of 1.45 mM sterile hypoxanthine, 1.6 mL of sterile sodium bicarbonate, 7.5% then sterilized with 0.8 µM, 0.45 µM, 0.2 µM filters and put at 2–8 °C.

Plasmodium falciparum culture

Plasmodium falciparum 3D7 strain, obtained through Biodefense and Emerging Infections Research Resources Repository (BEI Resources, NIAID, NIH) was maintained in continuous culture as previously described [13]. Briefly, P. falciparum-3D7 were suspended in 5 mL of complete media with serum (CMS) at 6% haematocrit in tissue culture flasks (Corning Glass Works, Corning, NY). The flasks were flushed with a gas mixture consisting of 5% oxygen, 5% carbon (IV) oxide and 90% nitrogen (Air Products Corp., Allentown, PA), sealed, and incubated at 37 °C. The medium was changed daily, and fresh RBCs added when required. Parasite growth was monitored microscopically by counting Giemsa-stained thin blood smears. When parasitaemia exceeded 3%, ring-stage parasites were synchronized by sorbitol lysis (5% d-sorbitol (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) as follows: Parasites were mixed and transferred into a 15 mL centrifuge tube and centrifuged at 800 g for 10 min. After removing the supernatant, 5% d-sorbitol pre-warmed to 37 °C was added to the RBC pellet, incubated for 10 min at 37 °C, vortexed for 1 min and re-centrifuged at 800 g for 10 min. After aspirating the supernatant and repeating the process twice using TCM, ≥ 90% ring forms was achieved.

Serum preparation

Serum was obtained from blood samples as previously described [15] with minor modifications. Briefly, whole blood collected in plain (anticoagulant free) blood bags from each study participant was stored at 2–8 °C overnight to allow settling of the serum and cells portions. Serum portion was transferred into 50 mL centrifuge tubes, and centrifuged at 800 g for 10 min. The supernatant was transferred into 50 mL centrifuge tube to remove all cell components. This step was repeated three times, and the serum was stored at -65 to -80 °C until further use. The sera from the six male adults (non-immune) was pooled together forming approximately 2000 mL, which was used as negative control for subsequent experiments. Serum from each of the immune or non-immune pooled serum was divided into two equal portions. One portion was heat inactivated at 56 °C for 30 min in a water bath, as previously described [7]. Experiments were carried out in 1 or 10% sera, prepared as previously described [7]. Briefly, 10% immune or non-immune CMS was prepared by adding 0.5 mL participant’s serum to 4.5 mL serum free media. To prepare 1% immune or non-immune CMS, 0.5 mL of 10% immune/non-immune CMS was added to 4.5 mL serum free media, making a tenfold dilution. This was done for heat-inactivated and non-heat inactivated sera.

Growth inhibition assay (GIA)

In vitro anti-plasmodial susceptibility assay was performed as previously described [14] with some modifications. Briefly, tenfold dilution in TCM was done for immune serum, non-immune serum, and negative control wells. Parasitaemia in the GIA assays of continuous culture that were greater than 3% were lowered to 1%, and adjusted to final 1–2% hematocrit. A ratio of 1:10 serum dilution in 100 µL final volume was dispensed on Nalgene Nunc, 96 flat-bottom well cell cultures sterile with lid microlitre plates (Magna, Leicestershire, UK), and 10 µL of 3D7 parasite was added in each well then incubate at 37 °C for 72 h in modular reservoirs, gassed with 90% nitrogen, 5% carbon dioxide and 5% oxygen. Parasite growth was evaluated using SYBR Green I fluorescence assay as follows: 4 µL of 10X SYBR Green I dye was added to 2 mL of malaria SYBR Green I lysis buffer [20 mM Tris (pH 7.5), 5 mM EDTA, 0.16% (wt/vol) saponin, and 1.6% (vol/vol) Triton X-100], and 100 µL of this mixture was transferred to each well. The plates were stored in the dark at ambient temperature for 24 h [16]. The plates were then examined for relative fluorescence units (RFUs) per well using a fluorescence plate reader (Tecan™ Morrisville, North Carolina, United States). Parasite replication was quantified for each serum sample (immune/pooled non-immune sera) and expressed as the mean percentage growth inhibition by:

$${\text{Percentage growth inhibition}} = \frac{{{\text{average RFUs in growth medium }} - {\text{average RFUs inpatients serum}}/{\text{pooled serum}}}}{{{\text{Average RFU in growth medium}}}} \times 100\%$$

Optimization was done to validate the assay and control reference ranges were established upon which the assay performance was monitored using anti-malarial drugs dihydroartemisinin (DHA) and lumefantrine (LU) that have known IC50 for the reference parasite strain. The drugs DHA and LU were used as positive control and tissue culture media (10% CMS) was used as negative control. All experiments were conducted in triplicate.

Parasite clearance rates calculation

The statistical models used to estimate the parasite clearance measures and lag phase duration were fitted using the Parasite Clearance Estimator (PCE) tool developed by Worldwide Antimalarial Resistance Network (WWARN) [17]. Briefly, thick and thin smears of malaria blood slides were generated examined under light microscope at 100× magnification for presence of malaria parasites as part of monitoring treatment outcome. From the initial scan through slides with parasite counts/WBC count ratio less than 2 in thick smears were regarded as low density infection and reading done in this smear. The parasite density in this low density smears were estimated as the number of parasites, the asexual forms only, counted against the number of white blood cells (usually 200 for low density or 500 for extra low density with less than 10 parasites pre 200 WBCs). Slides with parasite counts/WBC count ratio exceeding two were counted in thin smear as infected RBC counts/total number of RBC counts (usually in at least 2000 RBCs). The readouts of counts per either WBCs or RBCs were converted to parasite densities at time points 0, 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, and 48 h, then continued at least every 24 h until clearance depicted by until two subsequent negative malaria blood slides. A malaria blood film was considered negative if no parasite observed after scanning 200 high power fields (since a high quality HPF contains about 20 WBCs, this represents approximately 4000 WBCs). Data on parasite density was converted to csv file format and uploaded into the WWARN parasite clearance estimator.

Data was downloaded from the PCE and the following parameters were estimated: parasite clearance half-life, parasite clearance rate constant (K/h), and the estimated time to reduce parasitaemia by 50% (PC50), 90% (PC90), 95% (PC95), and 99% (PC99). Log transformed parasite density was plotted against time in hours to generate slope half-life (T1/2) which is defined as the time needed for parasitaemia to be reduced by half [18]. This constant is independent of starting value of parasitaemia. The slope half-life was calculated as follows:T1/2 = loge (2)/K = 0.692/K, where K is the clearance rate constant. The clearance rate K represents the rate of parasite clearance after start of drug treatment.

Statistical analysis

Data was analysed using GraphPad Prism version 5.03 (GraphPad software, Inc., San Diego, CA) and Minitab, Version 17 (Minitab Inc., State College, PA). Normality of the data was confirmed using Shapiro–Wilk test. Data are presented as the median with interquartile range ([IQR] 25th and 75th percentiles). Statistical difference between groups was determined using t test and Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test. Correlation between groups was assessed using Pearson correlation coefficient test. Differences with a p-value less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

Growth inhibitory activity

The in vitro growth inhibition of P. falciparum in serum from the 105 immune study participants and non-immune were compared using Wilcoxon matched pair signed rank test. The percentage growth inhibition of P. falciparum at 10 and 1% serum concentration from the study participants was significantly higher than for the non-immune controls (p < 0.0001) (Fig. 1), indicating parasite growth inhibition was due to the immune status. There was no statistically significant difference in percentage growth inhibition for heat inactivated (+HA) serum compared to non-heat inactivated (−HA) serum at 10% serum concentration (p = 0.18). Conversely, the percentage growth inhibition was significantly higher for −HA serum than +HA serum at 1% serum concentration (p = 0.009) (Fig. 2). The results revealed the role of complement when the assay was performed at 1% serum concentrations where antibodies are at limiting concentrations.

Fig. 1
figure1

Anti-parasite activity in sera from study participants reaches saturation at a low testing concentration. Individual data plot represents in vitro growth inhibition of P. falciparum parasites (3D7) in the presence of 10% or 1% (v/v) serum concentration from immune patients. Circles indicate results for each study participant (n = 105). A serum pool consistent of six non-immune volunteers (indicated by blue line) was tested to determine background activity of the GIA assay. Median and 95% confidence interval are indicated for each experimental conditions

Fig. 2
figure2

The contribution of complement to anti-parasite activity in sera is revealed at lower concentrations. Boxplot comparing GIA activity of Sera tested at 1% (left panel) (n = 105) and 10% (right panel) n = 105) with (+HA) and without (−HA) complement inactivation

Age and GIA activity

To determine whether age or parasitaemia were confounding factors in GIA, the GIA data were stratified based on individuals younger than 5 years (< 5 years) or 5 years and older (≥ 5 years). There was no age-dependence of GIA activity nor significant correlation between GIA activity and parasite density (R2 = 0.03, p = 0.95 Pearson correlation coefficient) (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3
figure3

Age is not a confounding factor in the entire patient population. Boxplot showing impact of age < 5 years (n = 46) and ≥ 5 years (n = 59) on GIA in sera from symptomatic patients

Impact of pre-existing immunity, GIA and treatment outcome

The main question of the present study was whether pre-existing immunity had an impact on the parasitological outcome after drug treatment and the kinetic of the response. The mean T1/2 for both study arms combined was 2.38 h (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.23–2.52), the median was 2.40 h (interquartile range [IQR], 1.95–2.80), and the range was 0.97–4.22 h. The cutoff values for stratifying into the two different groups have previously been described [19, 20]. Correlations between drug treatment outcome as determined by parasite clearance parameters (slope half-life [T1/2] and clearance rate [K]) and pre-existing GIA activity in sera were assessed (Table 2). The main observation when performing the statistical analyses was that stratifying the data based on the kinetic of the drug response revealed two factors, complement and age were associated with a faster parasite clearance and slope half-life. Non-heat inactivated sera from study participants younger than 5 years showed a significant negative correlation between GIA activity and slope half-life (R2 = 0.698, p = 0.025 Pearson correlation) and a significant positive correlation between GIA activity and parasite clearance (R2 = 0.604, p = 0.05 Pearson correlation). These correlations are lost when sera were heat-inactivated, clearly demonstrating the role of complement in clearing the parasite under drug treatment.

Table 2 Correlation between parasitological response to drugs and pre-existing GIA activity

Discussion

The present study utilized samples from a TES study with a comprehensive immunological profile [20] and parasitological characterization. To complete the immune-parasitological profile, the functional activity of sera collected prior to drug treatment was assessed in a sensitive GIA assay [14]. To determine the contribution of innate factors such as complement, sera were tested with and without heat-inactivation. The initial analysis showed that the contribution of complement to the anti-parasite activity was only notable at low serum concentrations, where anti-malarial antibodies are likely under limiting concentrations. This confirms previous reports demonstrating the role of complement in GIA activity [7, 20].

The next step was to determine the impact of age on the GIA activity. Contrarily to a previous study [21], an age-dependent response in the functional activity was not displayed by the sera. This contradiction is likely because in the current study, population is comprised of participants that presented with malaria symptoms while other studies investigated the role of age in asymptomatic populations.

The key observation of this study was made when the data were stratified based on the drug kinetic response of the study participants [20]. This classification revealed that the parasitological response (i.e., parasite clearance rate and slope half-life) to drug was linked to GIA activity in non-heat-inactivated sera in patients under the age of five (Table 2). This finding suggests that the role of complement varies depending on the age of the study participant, corroborating previous studies that have demonstrated the importance of age in immune acquisition [22,23,24]. Previous assessment of the serological antibody profile did not find differences between the age groups [20] and, therefore, findings in this study points towards a greater role of innate factors in younger patients. The need for complement and complement fixing antibodies has been reported to be crucial for the protection against malaria clinical disease [7], supporting observation in this study that heat-inactivated serum has lower GIA activity. It does not preclude that there may be differences in the levels of malaria-specific IgM which has not been assessed. This is the main antibody isotype fixing complement and there may be differences in the distribution of malaria-specific IgM and IgG in the different age groups.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the present study reveals differential relationships between adaptive immunity, innate immunity (mainly the role of complement), and response to drug treatment as function of age of the symptomatic study participants. Anti-parasitic activity (GIA) significantly correlated with T1/2 and K only in sera of younger symptomatic patients. This effect is dependent of intact (non-heat inactivated serum) indicating the importance of innate factors such as complement. These findings provide insight into improvement in effective use of ACT (dose adjustments) in relation to age in malaria endemic areas.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article.

Abbreviations

ACT:

Artemisinin-based combination therapy

AL:

Artemether-lumefantrine

AMA-1:

Apical membrane antigen 1

ASMQ:

Artesunate mefloquine

BEI:

Biodefense and Emerging Infections Research Resources Repository

CMS:

Complete media with serum

CNHR:

Consortium for National Health Research

DEID:

Department of Emerging and Infectious Diseases

DHA:

Dihydroartemisinin

EIR:

Entomological Inoculation Rates

GIA:

Growth Inhibition Assay

−HA:

Non-heat inactivated

+HA:

Heat inactivated

K:

Clearance rate

K/hour:

Parasite clearance rate constant

KEMRI:

Kenya Medical Research Institute

LU:

Lumefantrine

MSP-1:

Merozoite surface protein 1

NAI:

Naturally acquired immunity

PCE:

Parasite clearance estimator

PCR:

Polymerase chain reaction

RBC:

Red blood cell

RFUs:

Relative fluorescence units

sSA:

sub-Saharan Africa

TCM:

Tissue culture media

TESs:

Therapeutic efficacy studies

T1/2 :

Slope half-life

USAMRD-A:

United States Army Medical Research Directorate-Africa

WBCs:

White blood cells

WHO:

World Health Organization

WRAIR:

Walter Reed Army Institute of Research

WRP:

Walter Reed Project

References

  1. 1.

    Fowkes FJ, Boeuf P, Beeson JG. Immunity to malaria in an era of declining malaria transmission. Parasitology. 2016;143:139–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Beeson JG, Osier FH, Engwerda CR. Recent insights into humoral and cellular immune responses against malaria. Trends Parasitol. 2008;4:578–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Osier FH, Fegan G, Polley SD, Murungi L, Verra F, Tetteh KK, et al. Breadth and magnitude of antibody responses to multiple Plasmodium falciparum merozoite antigens are associated with protection from clinical malaria. Infect Immun. 2008;76:2240–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Ataide R, Ashley EA, Powell R, Chan JA, Malloy MJ, O’Flaherty K, et al. Host immunity to Plasmodium falciparum and the assessment of emerging artemisinin resistance in a multinational cohort. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2017;114:3515–20.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    WHO. World Malaria Report 2017. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Mugyenyi CK, Elliott SR, Yap XZ, Feng G, Boeuf P, Fegan G, et al. Declining malaria transmission differentially impacts the maintenance of humoral immunity to Plasmodium falciparum in children. J Infect Dis. 2017;216:887–98.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Boyle MJ, Reiling L, Feng G, Langer C, Osier FH, Aspeling-Jones H, et al. Human antibodies fix complement to inhibit Plasmodium falciparum invasion of erythrocytes and are associated with protection against malaria. Immunity. 2015;42:580–90.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    McCallum FJ, Persson KE, Mugyenyi CK, Fowkes FJ, Simpson JA, Richards JS, et al. Acquisition of growth-inhibitory antibodies against blood-stage Plasmodium falciparum. PLoS One. 2008;3:e3571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Murhandarwati EE, Wang L, Black CG, Nhan DH, Richie TL, Coppel RL. Inhibitory antibodies specific for the 19-kilodalton fragment of merozoite surface protein 1 do not correlate with delayed appearance of infection with Plasmodium falciparum in semi-immune individuals in Vietnam. Infect Immun. 2009;77:4510–7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Hodder AN, Crewther PE, Anders RF. Specificity of the protective antibody response to apical membrane antigen 1. Infect Immun. 2001;69:3286–94.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Crompton PD, Miura K, Traore B, Kayentao K, Ongoiba A, Weiss G, et al. In vitro growth-inhibitory activity and malaria risk in a cohort study in mali. Infect Immun. 2010;78:737–45.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Omukunda E, Githeko A, Ndong’a MF, Mushinzimana E, Atieli H, Wamae P. Malaria vector population dynamics in highland and lowland regions of western Kenya. J Vector Borne Dis. 2013;50:85–92.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Trager W, Jensen JB. Human malaria parasites in continuous culture. Science. 1976;193:673–5.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Johnson JD, Dennull RA, Gerena L, Lopez-Sanchez M, Roncal NE, Waters NC. Assessment and continued validation of the malaria SYBR green I-based fluorescence assay for use in malaria drug screening. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2007;51:1926–33.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Persson KE, McCallum FJ, Reiling L, Lister NA, Stubbs J, Cowman AF, et al. Variation in use of erythrocyte invasion pathways by Plasmodium falciparum mediates evasion of human inhibitory antibodies. J Clin Invest. 2008;118:342–51.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Cheruiyot AC, Auschwitz JM, Lee PJ, Yeda RA, Okello CO, Leed SE, et al. Assessment of the Worldwide Antimalarial Resistance Network standardized procedure for in vitro malaria drug sensitivity testing using SYBR Green assay for field samples with various initial parasitemia levels. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2016;60:2417–24.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Parasite Clearance Estimator. https://www.wwarn.org/parasite-clearance-estimator-pce. Accessed 01 Aug 2019.

  18. 18.

    Flegg JA, Guerin PJ, White NJ, Stepniewska K. Standardizing the measurement of parasite clearance in falciparum malaria: the parasite clearance estimator. Malar J. 2011;10:339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Chebon LJ, Ngalah BS, Ingasia LA, Juma DW, Muiruri P, Cheruiyot J, et al. Genetically determined response to artemisinin treatment in Western Kenyan Plasmodium falciparum parasites. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:e0162524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Odhiambo G, Bergmann-Leitner E, Maraka M, Wanjala CNL, Duncan E, Waitumbi J, et al. Correlation between malaria-specific antibody profiles and responses to artemisinin combination therapy for treatment of uncomplicated malaria in western Kenya. J Infect Dis. 2019;219:1969–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Dent AE, Bergmann-Leitner ES, Wilson DW, Tisch DJ, Kimmel R, Vulule J, et al. Antibody-mediated growth inhibition of Plasmodium falciparum: relationship to age and protection from parasitemia in Kenyan children and adults. PLoS ONE. 2008;3:e3557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Djimde AA, Doumbo OK, Traore O, Guindo AB, Kayentao K, Diourte Y, et al. Clearance of drug-resistant parasites as a model for protective immunity in Plasmodium falciparum malaria. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2003;69:558–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Doolan DL, Dobano C, Baird JK. Acquired immunity to malaria. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2009;22:13–36.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Marsh K, Kinyanjui S. Immune effector mechanisms in malaria. Parasite Immunol. 2006;28:51–60.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the participants in Kombewa District Hospital, the research staff, Kenya Medical Research Institute and United States Medical Research Directorate-Africa for their support. We would like to thank all the colleagues in the Malaria Drug Resistance laboratory for their technical and moral support. We would also thank the Director of KEMRI for permission to publish this work.

Disclaimer

Material has been reviewed by the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research. There is no objection to its presentation and/or publication. The opinions or assertions contained herein are the private views of the author, and are not to be construed as official, or as reflecting true views of the Department of the Army or the Department of Defense. The investigators have adhered to the policies for protection of human subjects as prescribed in AR 70–25.

Funding

This work was supported by the Armed Forces Health Surveillance Center-Department of Defense Global Emerging Infections System and by the Consortium for National Health Research (CNHR) grant # RCDG-2012-032/Alternative-2014 to Dr. Daniel Ochiel. The funders did not participate in the design of the study and collection, analysis, and interpretation of data and in writing the manuscript through the co-authors who work for the organizations.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

DO, BO, EK provided funding. BA provided clinical study samples, conducted clinical data analysis. CW, DO and EK designed the study protocol. CW performed laboratory assays. HA supervised and provided assays execution guidance. CW, EBL, EK, DO, GO performed data analysis and interpretation. CW, EBL, EK wrote manuscript. DO, EK, EBL, BO, BA revised, and reviewed the final manuscript draft. CW, EBL, HA, GO, BO, BA, EK approved final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Edwin Kamau.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the scientific and ethics review boards of the Kenya Medical Research Institute, Nairobi Kenya (KEMRI; approved protocol # 2518) and the Institutional Review Board of the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Silver Spring, MD (WRAIR; approved protocol #1935). This study was also registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01976780). All participants and/or their legal guardians gave a voluntary written informed consent before any study procedures commenced.

Consent for publication

Not applicable. No personal identifiable data was used in the study. All authors have provided consent to publish the findings in this study.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wanjala, C.N.L., Bergmann-Leitner, E., Akala, H.M. et al. The role of complement immune response on artemisinin-based combination therapy in a population from malaria endemic region of Western Kenya. Malar J 19, 168 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-020-03242-4

Download citation

Keywords

  • Malaria antibody
  • Complement
  • Malaria immunity
  • Artemisinin combination therapy
  • Western Kenya
  • Malaria holoendemic areas