Skip to main content

Single nucleotide polymorphism analysis of pvmdr-1 in Plasmodium vivax isolated from military personnel of Republic of Korea in 2016 and 2017

Abstract

Background

Malaria chemoprophylaxis using chloroquine (CQ) and primaquine (PQ) has been administered to resident soldiers in the 3rd Army of Republic of Korea (ROK) to prevent malaria infection since the year 1997. Due to mass chemoprophylaxis against malaria, concern exists about the occurrence of chloroquine resistance (CQR). This study aimed to investigate the single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of the Plasmodium vivax multi-drug resistance protein-1 (pvmdr-1) gene to monitor the risk of CQR.

Methods

SNPs of the pvmdr-1 gene were analysed in 73 soldiers of the 3rd Army of ROK diagnosed with infection by P. vivax.

Results

Quintuple mutations (G698S, L845F, M908L, T958M, and F1076L) were detected in 73 soldiers. A newly identified non-synonymous mutation in the Y541C position had been introduced into P. vivax malaria-endemic areas in ROK, at a frequency of 1.3% (1/73). In addition, synonymous mutations were detected at positions K44 (38.4%, 28/73), L493 (26%, 19/73), T529 (61.6%, 45/73), and E1233 (52.1%, 38/73). Based on these SNPs, pvmdr-1 sequences of ROK were classified into 6 haplotypes. The phylogenetic analysis closed to the type of North Korean showed that P. vivax malaria of ROK could be a reason of influx from North Korea.

Conclusions

This study showed that synonymous and non-synonymous mutations of pvmdr-1 were observed in the malaria chemoprophylaxis-executed regions of ROK from 2016 to 2017. Based on the rapid transition of pvmdr-1 SNPs, continuous surveillance for SNPs of pvmdr-1 related to CQR in the malaria-endemic regions of ROK is essential.

Background

Malaria, a life-threatening disease caused by Plasmodium parasites, endangers about 40% of the world's population [1, 2]. Depending on the recent World Health Organization (WHO) malaria report, all malaria infection cases have been declined from 238 million cases in 2000 to 229 million cases in 2019. In case of P. vivax malaria, it decreased from about 7% in 2000 to 3% in 2019 [3]. This worldwide malaria reduction trends are attributed to the WHO preventive policy of eradicating malaria. Nevertheless, annually, more than 300 million people of the world`s population are infected with malaria, and about 500,000 people die from malaria. Vivax malaria was supposed to be eradicated in the Republic of Korea (ROK), but a re-emergence was reported in Paju City of Gyeonggi Province in 1993 [4, 5]. According to Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency, since re-emergence occurred in a soldier of the 3rd Army of ROK, the incidence of malaria infections has been steadily increasing [6]. In ROK, P. vivax malaria-endemic regions are localized near the DMZ (demilitarized zone; the border between ROK and the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, DPRK) [7]. Thus, soldiers and civilians residing in DMZ have been classified as a high-risk group of malaria infection. Among the total malaria patients of ROK, the military (soldiers and military veterans) accounted for a large proportion. Because of this, members of the army of ROK have undergone prophylactic chemotherapy against malaria to prevent patient outbreaks since 1997 [8]. The detailed procedure of chemoprophylaxis is as following, 300 mg chloroquine (CQ) is administrated weekly to military personnel nearby DMZ from July to October for 15 weeks, and 15 mg PQ is subsequently administrated daily for 2 weeks [9].

CQ is effective to eradicate P. vivax in asexual blood stages and gametocytes, and primaquine (PQ) is responsible for killing the hypnozoite form of P. vivax in the liver stage. Due to the risk of chloroquine resistance (CQR) by massive and long-term use of chemoprophylaxis for prevention of malaria [10], the army of ROK has been monitoring drug resistance by analysing mutations in pvmdr-1 [11]. Subsequently, several changes in the ROK Armed Forces chemoprophylaxis programme were implemented, including the reduction of the period of hydroxychloroquine (400 mg weekly) chemoprophylaxis by 2 months in 2008, and the discontinuation of terminal primaquine chemoprophylaxis (15 mg × 14 days) in 2016 in moderate-risk area [12]. To date, various CQR cases in several regions including Indonesia, Southeast Asia, India, and Central and South America have been reported [13,14,15,16,17,18,19]. There is concern about the influx of malaria resistance from Southeast Asian countries [20]. Recent studies have been shown that long-term chemoprophylaxis could induce genetic mutation. For example, polymorphism of pvcrt-o and pvmdr-1 was detected by CQ treatment [21,22,23]. Thus, it can be hypothesized that genetic changes occur in malaria chemoprophylaxis-executed malaria-endemic regions of ROK. Herein, this study was to focus on the surveillance of genetic mutation in pvmdr-1 (Malaria drug resistance-related gene).

Methods

Ethics statement and sample preparation

This study was approved by the ethics committee of the Armed Forces Medical Command (Approval No. AFMC-16067-IRB-16-056, September 2016). An approval form was used to obtain written informed consent and permission from each participant for providing a 5 ml blood sample.

Volunteers enrolment—inclusion criteria

Blood samples were collected from malaria patients who agreed to the study. Positive patients with a rapid diagnostic test (Standard Diagnostics Inc., USA) or blood smear test with microscopy, or malaria-suspected patients (A person who needs a malaria molecular test as a result of medical treatment with a body temperature of 38 degrees Celsius) were enrolled this study. Most patients have a history of fever in the previous 48 h without malaria chemoprophylaxis compliance. All blood samples collected from 3 military hospitals (Yangju, Koyang, and Ildong), during 2016–2017 were screened using 18S rRNA nested PCR.

Collection of clinical isolates

141 venous blood samples (Whole blood-EDTA samples) from male patients infected with malaria or malaria suspected patients with fever were collected in the three Armed Forces Hospitals (Yangju, Koyang, and Ildong) near the DMZ located in northern Gyeonggi Province and northwest region of the ROK from 2016 to 2017. The Armed Forces Hospitals performed a rapid diagnostic test (STANDARD DIAGNOSTICS Inc., USA), and a blood smear test with microscopy for all participants.

Plasmodium vivax nested PCR analysis (18S rRNA and pvmdr-1)

Genomic DNA was extracted from 200 ul Whole blood-EDTA using DNeasy Blood and Tissue Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) as recommended by the manufacturer. For screening P. vivax infection, purified DNA samples from all patients were diagnosed by nested polymerase chain reaction (PCR) targeting P. vivax 18S rRNA. 1100 bp or 120 bp was detected by 2nd nested PCR [24].

As shown in the previous report [23], the pvmdr-1 gene was amplified using the indicated primer sets of nested PCR (Table 1) for the SNPs analysis of pvmdr-1. The first round of PCR was performed under the following conditions: 94 °C for 5 min, followed by 30 cycles of 94 °C for 30 s, 57 °C for 30 s, and 72 °C for 4.5 min, and a final extension at 72 °C for 10 min. The second PCR was performed under the following conditions: 94 °C for 5 min, followed by 35 cycles of 94 °C for 30 s, 57 °C for 30 s, and 72 °C for 4 min, and a final extension at 72 °C for 10 min. PCR products were analysed on 1.5% agarose gels using 1 Kb Plus DNA Ladder (Thermo Fisher Scientific) by electrophoresis (Fig. 1) and visualized by Fluor Chem FC3 (Protein Simple, USA).

Table 1 Information of primers used to amplify pvmdr-1 gene
Fig. 1
figure 1

Gel electrophoresis of P. vivax 18S rRNA and pvmdr-1 nested PCR. a 18S rRNA nested PCR. Blood samples were collected from malaria patients who agreed to the study. All blood samples collected in three hospitals (Yangju, Koyang and Ildong), during 2016 and 2017, were screened using 18S rRNA nested PCR. Based on the screened result, 73 samples were identified as positive samples. 1100 bp or 120 bp was detected by 2nd PCR of 18S rRNA. b Nested PCR targeting pvmdr-1 amplicons ranged from 104 bp to 4,254 bp were observed in 73 P. vivax positive samples using pvmdr-1 nested PCR. M: 1 Kb Plus DNA Ladder

Sequencing of pvmdr-1

After the amplification, sequence analysis was performed by specific sequencing primers as shown in Table 1. Sequencing primers were designed to cover the near full-length pvmdr-1 gene (4,395 bp). Direct sequencing of PCR products was performed by using Big Dye™ Terminator v3.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit (Applied Biosystems, CA, USA) and the products were resolved on ABI 3730XL Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems, CA, USA).

Phylogenetic analysis

Nearly full-length sequence (from 104 bp to 4,290 bp) of pvmdr-1 was used to perform phylogenetic relationship analysis. The sequences of Sal I strain (GenBank Accession# AY571984) and global parasites in PlasmoDB [25] were used as reference sequences. pvmdr-1 sequences of 73 P. vivax clinical samples isolated from military personnel of the ROK army in 2016 and 2017 were analysed using BioEdit Sequence Alignment Editor. The phylogenetic analysis was constructed by 1000 bootstrap replications [26] using the neighbor-joining method [27].

Results

Nested PCR and SNP analyses of the pvmdr-1 gene

A total of 73 out of 141 samples were identified as P. vivax infected specimen through nested PCR analysis targeting 18S rRNA (Fig. 1a). For SNP analysis of pvmdr-1, nested PCR targeting pvmdr-1 was performed using 73 positive specimens (Fig. 1b), which were used for sequence analysis. As shown in Table 2, five non-synonymous mutations (G698S, L845F, M908L, T958M, and F1076L) were detected in all specimens (2016: 20/20, 2017: 53/53). Interestingly, a novel non-synonymous mutation (Y541C) was detected in 1 soldier at a frequency of 1.8% (2017: 1/53). In addition, silent mutations in K44 [2016: 4/20 (20%), 2017: 24/53 (45.2%)], L493 [2016: 5/20 (25%), 2017: 14/53 (26.4%)], T529 [2016: 15/20 (75%), 2017: 30/53 (56.6%)], and E1233 [2016: 8/20 (40%), 2017: 30/53 (56.6%) positions were detected in specimens. Alignment and mapping data of pvmdr-1 wild-type and mutant-type sequences were provided (Additional File 1: Fig. S1).

Table 2 The list and frequency of pvmdr-1 mutations in ROK army from 2016 to 2017

Genotypic classification of the pvmdr-1 gene

As shown in Table 3, all specimens were clustered into 6 groups from Type 0 to Type 5, and all haplotypes possessed 5 non-synonymous mutations (G698S, L845F, M908L, T958M, and F1076L). 6 haplotypes were classified genotypically based on pvmdr-1 sequences from 73 specimens in the ROK army from 2016 to 2017 (Fig. 2). Type 0 was found in 1 case in 2016, and there was no mutation other than the 5 non-synonymous mutations. For synonymous mutation, K44 mutant was found in Type 1 (2016; 1/20, 2017; 8/53) and Type 2 (2016; 3/20, 2017; 16/53), T529 mutant was found in Type 3 (2016; 5/20, 2017; 14/53), Type 4 (2016; 10/20, 2017; 14/53), and Type 5 (2016; 0/20, 2017 1/53), E1233 mutant was found in Type 2 (2016; 3/20, 2017; 16/53) and Type 3 (2016; 5/20, 2017; 14/53), and L493 was only found in Type 3 (2016; 5/20, 2017; 14/53). Type 5 (2017; 1/53) was nearly the same as Type 4, except it harboured the first identified Y541C mutation. In the years 2016 and 2017, Type 4 (24/73) was abundant and showed a 100% match with the pvmdr-1 sequence of North Korean.

Table 3 The haplotypes of the pvmdr-1 gene in Republic of Korea from 2016 to 2017
Fig. 2
figure 2

The malaria-endemic region and pvmdr-1 haplotypes of ROK in 2016 and 2017. Each red triangle indicates malaria-endemic region of haplotypes [Goseong (Type 1 and 4), Cheorwon (Type 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5), Yeonchen (Type 0, 1, 2, 3 and 4), Paju (Type 1, 2, 3 and 4), Gimpo (Type 2), and Hwacheon (Type 1 and 4)]. Six haplotypes were classified from 73 specimens collected in the Armed Forces Hospitals (Yangju, Koyang, and Ildong). Numeric letters mean 6 haplotypes. Reprinted from USGS National Map Viewer [36] under a CC BY license, with permission from U.S. Geological Survey, original copyright 2002

Phylogenetic analysis of the pvmdr-1 gene

The phylogenetic relationships on the overall pvmdr-1 sequence were analysed and classified them into 6 haplotypes (Table 3). Type 4 sequence was identical to the MDR sequence in North Korean (length = 0.00001). The neighbourhood types of 6 haplotypes were identified as China_NB-16 and Papua New Guinea-PNG58/Thailand_VKBT-106 (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Phylogenetic analysis of 6 classified haplotypes via pvmdr-1 SNP analysis of 73 P. vivax clinical samples. The sequences of pvmdr-1 were aligned with that of Sal I strain (GenBank Accession# AY571984) and PlasmoDB by using BioEdit Sequence Alignment Editor. The aligned sequences were performed phylogenetic analysis by using 1000 bootstrap replications and the neighbour-joining method

Discussion

Plasmodium vivax-endemic area is localized in the Gyeonggi province of the ROK near the DMZ. In this study, pvmdr-1 SNPs of P. vivax were analysed using malaria-infected blood specimens in malaria-endemic regions including Goseong, Cheorwon, Yeonchen, Paju, Gimpo, and Hwacheon (Fig. 2). Since 1997, the ROK Army has conducted continuous malaria chemoprophylaxis (CQ and PQ) to prevent and reduce transmission of malaria for approximately 100,000 military personnel. Due to the massive chemoprophylaxis efforts, there is a consistent concern regarding CQR. According to various reports [5, 28], long-term or massive chemoprophylaxis could cause CQR. Thus, the surveillance system should be needed to estimate the risk of chemoprophylaxis-mediated drug resistance. ROK army also has been interested in analysing SNPs of drug resistant-related genes along with the implementation of chemoprophylaxis. Thus, the SNPs analysis of pvmdr-1 against malaria-infected soldiers near chemoprophylaxis-executed malaria-endemic regions was investigated in clinical samples.

CQR has occasionally been observed in malaria-endemic regions that follow extensive chemoprophylaxis. Through preventive CQR study, CQR was confirmed in 2 of 484 enrolled patients [29]. CQR was also studied via the treatment responses of P. vivax malaria patients in the ROK monitored during 2003–2007 [28]. Until recently, it was reported that P. vivax resistance to CQ had emerged in South America and French Guiana [30, 31]. In the ROK, to date, most malaria patients in the military have been cured with malaria chemotherapy. However, issues with chemoprophylaxis-mediated resistance have recently been reported [6, 28]. For example, Yeom and colleagues suggested that malaria resistance to prophylactic agents could decrease CQ susceptibility, and they cited that the mass chemoprophylaxis with CQ in the ROK Army could contribute to this issue [5]. Therefore, the relationship between CQ susceptibility and chemoprophylaxis should also be investigated. To date, although CQR cases of P. vivax malaria have been reported in many other areas of the world, the drug resistance in malaria-endemic regions of ROK has been reported rarely [28]. However, the issue of drug insusceptibility to CQ and rapid transition of pvmdr-1 SNPs has been raised [32].

In previous, Chung et al. identified four SNPs (F1076L, T529, E1233, and S1358) of pvmdr-1 in malaria-endemic regions of ROK from 2011 to 2012 [11]. In this study, the Y541C, K44, L493, and T529 mutations centred around quintuple mutations (G698S, L845F, M908L, T958M, and F1076L) in the pvmdr-1 gene were detected in malaria-infected military personnel of the ROK. Thus, it could be inferred that the rapid SNP transition of pvmdr-1 in chemoprophylaxis-executed malaria-endemic regions has been occurring.

In the reports investigating the relationship between CQR and pvmdr-1 SNP, Suwanarusk et al. revealed that the Y976F mutation was linked to CQR based on an increase in the IC50 value [33]. In another report, the F1076L mutation was linked to the Y976F SNP as a background mutation [34]. This study neither identified any SNPs at the Y976F position nor concluded whether Y976F was linked with F1076L. And it also showed no CQR with the Y541C mutation. Thus, it could be inferred that the Y541C mutation was not related to CQR.

Phylogenetic analysis showed that Type 4 (T529, G698S, L845F, M908L, T958M, and F1076L) was significantly related to the Type identified for North Koreans. In addition, a review by Chai indicated that a mosquito with blood from a malaria patient in North Korea near the DMZ flew south and infected Korean soldiers [6]. Based on this result, it is deduced that P. vivax malaria was introduced from North Korea, rather than as an influx from foreign countries.

Since 2016, to evaluate the risk from malaria chemoprophylaxis in the ROK, G6PD deficiency prevalence has been investigated [35], and to infer the risk of resistance potentially introduced by chemoprophylaxis, SNPs of P. vivax genes have been examined by the Armed forces Medical Command (AFMC) and the Armed forces Medical Research Institute (AFMRI) of ROK. This study focused SNPs of pvmdr-1 against malaria-infected soldiers near chemoprophylaxis-executed malaria-endemic regions. However, for a more practical resistance analysis and effectiveness of malaria chemoprophylaxis, in vivo or ex vivo resistance studies via analysing malaria infection ratio or CQ metabolite under malaria chemoprophylaxis are needed via further research. Therefore, it is currently planned to perform these studies in cooperation with AFMC and KDCA (Korea Disease Control Agency).

Conclusions

In this study, there were clinical samples that possessed various SNPs of pvmdr-1. Thus, it inferred that quintuple mutation (G698S, L845F, M908L, T958M, and F1076L) was a prevalent background mutation in malaria-infected military personnel of the ROK. Phylogenetic analysis indicated that the malaria type was close to the type seen in North Korean, indicating that P. vivax malaria in the ROK could have come from North Korea. Furthermore, consistent monitoring of chemoprophylaxis-linked pvmdr-1 polymorphisms should be conducted to detect rapidly changed SNP profiling against P. vivax malaria in the ROK.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets during and/or analysed during the current study available from the corresponding author(s) on reasonable request.

References

  1. Price RN, Tjitra E, Guerra CA, Yeung S, White NJ, Anstey NM. Vivax malaria: neglected and not benign. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2007;7(Suppl 6):79–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Guerra CA, Howes RE, Patil AP, Gething PW, Van Boeckel TP, Temperley WH, et al. The international limits and population at risk of Plasmodium vivax transmission in 2009. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2010;4:e774.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. WHO. World malaria report 2020. Geneva, World Health Organization, 2020.

  4. Chai IH, Lim GI, Yoon SN, Oh WI, Kim SJ, Chai JY. [Occurrence of tertian malaria in a male patient who has never been abroad](in Ko). Korean J Parasitol. 1994;3:195–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Yeom JS, Jun G, Kim JY, Lee WJ, Shin EH, Chang KS, et al. Status of Plasmodium vivax malaria in the Republic of Korea, 2008–2009: decrease followed by resurgence. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2012;10:429–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chai JY. History and current status of malaria in Korea. Infect Chemother. 2020;5:441–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Korean Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. South Korea Infectious Diseases Statistics System Online Database - Malaria Cases.

  8. Yeom JS, Ryu SH, Oh S, Choi DH, Song KJ, Oh YH, et al. Evaluation of anti-malarial effects of mass chemoprophylaxis in the Republic of Korea army. J Korean Med Sci. 2005;20:707–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. WHO. Guidelines for the treatment of malaria. 3rd Edn. Geneva, World Health Organization, 2015.

  10. Lee SW, Lee M, Lee DD, Kim C, Kim YJ, Kim JY, et al. Biological resistance of hydroxychloroquine for Plasmodium vivax malaria in the Republic of Korea. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2009;81:600–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Chung DI, Jeong S, Dinzouna-Boutamba SD, Yang HW, Yeo SG, Hong Y, et al. Evaluation of single nucleotide polymorphisms of pvmdr1 and microsatellite genotype in Plasmodium vivax isolates from Republic of Korea military personnel. Malar J. 2015;14:336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Im JH, Huh K, Yoon CG, Woo H, Lee JS, Chung MH, et al. Malaria control and chemoprophylaxis policy in the Republic of Korea Armed Forces for the previous 20 years (1997–2016). Malar J. 2018;17:295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Rieckmann KH, Davis DR, Hutton DC. Plasmodium vivax resistance to chloroquine? Lancet. 1989;2:11834.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Schuurkamp GJ, Spicer PE, Kereu RK, Bulungol PK, Rieckmann KH. Chloroquine-resistant Plasmodium vivax in Papua New Guinea. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1992;86:121–2.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Schwartz IK, Lackritz EM, Patchen LC. Chloroquine-resistant Plasmodium vivax from Indonesia. N Engl J Med. 1991;324:927.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Baird JK. Chloroquine resistance in Plasmodium vivax. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2004;48:4075–83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Ruebush TK 2nd, Zegarra J, Cairo J, Andersen EM, Green M, Pillai DR, et al. Chloroquine-resistant Plasmodium vivax malaria in Peru. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2003;69:548–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Soto J, Toledo J, Gutierrez P, Luzz M, Llinas N, Cedeno N, et al. Plasmodium vivax clinically resistant to chloroquine in Colombia. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2001;65:90–3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Marlar T, Myat Phone K, Aye YuS, Khaing Khaing G, Ma S, Myint O. Development of resistance to chloroquine by Plasmodium vivax in Myanmar. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1995;89:307–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Feng J, Xiao H, Zhang L, Yan H, Feng X, Fang W, et al. The Plasmodium vivax in China: decreased in local cases but increased imported cases from Southeast Asia and Africa. Sci Rep. 2015;5:8847.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Golassa L, Erko B, Baliraine FN, Aseffa A, Swedberg G. Polymorphisms in chloroquine resistance-associated genes in Plasmodium vivax in Ethiopia. Malar J. 2015;14:164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Anantabotla VM, Antony HA, Parija SC, Rajkumari N, Kini JR, Manipura R, et al. Polymorphisms in genes associated with drug resistance of Plasmodium vivax in India. Parasitol Int. 2019;70:92–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Barnadas C, Ratsimbasoa A, Tichit M, Bouchier C, Jahevitra M, Picot S, et al. Plasmodium vivax resistance to chloroquine in Madagascar: clinical efficacy and polymorphisms in pvmdr1 and pvcrt-o genes. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2008;52:4233–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Snounou G, Viriyakosol S, Zhu XP, Jarra W, Pinheiro L, do Rosario VE, et al. High sensitivity of detection of human malaria parasites by the use of nested polymerase chain reaction. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 1993;61:315–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Aurrecoechea C, Brestelli J, Brunk BP, Dommer J, Fischer S, Gajria B, et al. PlasmoDB: a functional genomic database for malaria parasites. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009;37:D539-543.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Pattengale ND, Alipour M, Bininda-Emonds OR, Moret BM, Stamatakis A. How many bootstrap replicates are necessary? J Comput Biol. 2010;17:337–54.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Saitou N, Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol. 1987;4:406–25.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Lee KS, Kim TH, Kim ES, Lim HS, Yeom JS, Jun G, et al. Chloroquine-resistant Plasmodium vivax in the Republic of Korea. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2009;80:215–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Park JW, Jun G, Yeom JS. Plasmodium vivax malaria: status in the Republic of Korea following reemergence. Korean J Parasitol. 2009;47(Suppl):S39-50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Goncalves LA, Cravo P, Ferreira MU. Emerging Plasmodium vivax resistance to chloroquine in South America: an overview. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2014;109:534–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Musset L, Heugas C, Naldjinan R, Blanchet D, Houze P, Abboud P, et al. Emergence of Plasmodium vivax resistance to chloroquine in French Guiana. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2019;63:e02116-e2118.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Schousboe ML, Ranjitkar S, Rajakaruna RS, Amerasinghe PH, Morales F, Pearce R, et al. Multiple origins of mutations in the mdr1 gene–a putative marker of chloroquine resistance in P. vivax. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2015;9:e0004196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Suwanarusk R, Chavchich M, Russell B, Jaidee A, Chalfein F, Barends M, et al. Amplification of pvmdr1 associated with multidrug-resistant Plasmodium vivax. J Infect Dis. 2008;198:1558–64.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Tacoli C, Gai PP, Siegert K, Wedam J, Kulkarni SS, Rasalkar R, et al. Characterization of Plasmodium vivax pvmdr1 polymorphisms in isolates from Mangaluru India. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2019;101:416–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Lee W, Lee SE, Lee MJ, Noh KT. Investigation of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency prevalence in a Plasmodium vivax-endemic area in the Republic of Korea (ROK). Malar J. 2020;19:317.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. USGS. National Map Viewer https://apps.nationalmap.gov/viewer/. Accessed 20 May 2022.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We appreciate for volunteers and military hospital officials who participated in this study.

Funding

This work was supported by the Internal Research Program from the Armed Forces Medical Research Institute of ROK (Fund code #16-internal-1).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

KTN, QP, and WL designed the project, WL conducted experiments, J-JB and KTN analysed the results, J-JB, CHL, and KTN wrote the manuscript, all authors reviewed the manuscript, all authors gave final approval of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kyung Tae Noh.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the ethics committee of the Armed Forces Medical Command (Approval No. AFMC-16067-IRB-16-056, September 2016). An approval form was used to obtain written informed consent and permission from each participant.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Fig. S1.

Alignment and mapping data of pvmdr-1 wild-type and mutant-type sequences in ROK army in 2016-2017. After the amplification of pvmdr-1using 73 P. vivax clinical samples, sequencing of PCR products was performed by using Big Dye™ Terminator v3.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit and ABI 3730XL Genetic Analyzer. Sequence analysis was performed using BioEdit Sequence Alignment Editor. The red box indicates the changed nucleotide in the alignment of pvmdr-1 SNPs for 20 and 53 specimens in 2016 and 2017. MDRF-WT is used as a reference sequence of pvmdr-1 gene (Gene Accession# AY571984).

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bong, JJ., Lee, W., Lee, C.H. et al. Single nucleotide polymorphism analysis of pvmdr-1 in Plasmodium vivax isolated from military personnel of Republic of Korea in 2016 and 2017. Malar J 21, 205 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-022-04214-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-022-04214-6

Keywords

  • Plasmodium vivax
  • Multi-drug resistance protein 1
  • Single nucleotide polymorphism
  • Chemoprophylaxis