Skip to main content
Download PDF

Factors associated with non-use of insecticide-treated bed nets among pregnant women in Zambia

Malaria Journal volume 21, Article number: 290 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Despite the Zambian government’s efforts to ensure 80% use of insecticide-treated nets (ITNs) among pregnant women, ITN use remains critically low. Only 49% of pregnant women reported sleeping under an ITN in 2018 in the country. This study aims to determine the prevalence of, and the factors associated with the non-use of ITNs among pregnant women in Zambia.

Methods

This study was a secondary analysis of the data collected during the 2018 Zambian Demographic and Health Survey. One thousand one hundred and thirty-eight (1 138) pregnant women were included in the study. The prevalence of the non-use of ITNs was computed and univariable and multivariable logistic regression models were fitted to determine the factors associated with the non-use of ITNs in the study population.

Results

The study found that 578 (50.8%) pregnant women reported not using an ITN the night before the survey. The results of the multivariable logistic regression indicated that, primary level education (OR = 2.13, 95% CI 1.23–3.68), ITN per household member (OR = 0.01, 95% CI 0.00–0.02), parity (OR = 0.83, 95% CI 0.70–0.99), moderate malaria prevalence provinces (OR = 0.34, 95% CI 0.23–0.50), high malaria prevalence provinces (OR = 0.26, 95% CI 0.18–0.39) and currently in a union (OR = 0.52, 95% CI 0.30–0.88) were significantly associated with the non-use of ITNs.

Conclusion

This study showed a high prevalence of the non-use of ITNs among pregnant women in Zambia. Factors found to be associated with the non-use of ITNs in the study population are: ITN per household member, parity, education, marital status and malaria prevalence provinces. Addressing the identified factors will require intensification of ITN programming and other malaria preventive measures.

Background

The World Health Organization (WHO) 2020 global health estimates indicate that malaria contributes significantly to mortality and morbidity in low-income countries [1, 2]. Global malaria infections increased from 228 million to 229 million cases between 2018 and 2019 while fatalities from malaria increased from 405 000 to 409 000 over the same period [1, 2]. In 2018 and 2019, Africa had the highest number of malaria cases globally (213 million and 215 million, respectively) and fatalities from malaria in Africa were 380 000 and 386 000 in 2018 and 2019, respectively [1, 2]. Furthermore, the estimated malaria cases in countries with high malaria transmissions in East and Southern Africa including Zambia, increased from 52.2 million to 59 million between 2018 and 2019 [1, 2].

Malaria remains endemic across all ten provinces of Zambia, and its entire population is at risk of contracting malaria [3, 4]. The risk of malaria is most significant among those living in provinces that usually experience a wetter climate, are rural or are impoverished [3]. The 2020 World malaria report showed that Zambia experienced an increase in reported malaria cases from 4 to 824 to 5 068 876 between 2018 and 2019 while the number of malaria deaths increased from 1 209 to 1 339 [2]. The general incidence of malaria in Zambia was 386 per 1 000 persons in 2013, 409 per 1 000 persons in 2014, and 335 per 1 000 persons in 2015 [5].

Malaria disproportionately affects pregnant women. Thus, malaria in pregnancy (MiP) is a significant public health problem, especially, in areas of sub-Saharan Africa that experience moderate to high transmissions of malaria [1, 2]. In 2018, 29% (11.2 million) of pregnant women had malaria infections and this increased to 11.6 million in 2019 [2]. As a result of malaria infections during pregnancy, 872 000 children were born with low birth weight in 2019 [2].

In Zambia, laboratory-confirmed malaria cases increased from 45 to 1 000 pregnant women in 2013 to 64 per 1 000 pregnant women in 2015, with Luapula province, a province with a high malaria prevalence, recording the highest incidence rate of 177 per 1 000 pregnant women in 2015 [5].

Malaria in pregnancy is one of the most preventable causes of negative birth outcomes [6, 7]. The negative outcomes include low birth weight, fetal loss, retarded growth, and premature birth [6, 7]. In malaria-endemic countries, malaria is a major cause of maternal anaemia, which has been associated with obstetric haemorrhage and maternal mortality [1]. Malaria-endemic countries are also disproportionately affected by iron deficiency anaemia, helminthic infections and the human immunodeficiency virus, which exacerbate clinical outcomes of malaria infection in pregnancy [1].

ITNs are an essential preventive intervention that have been proven to reduce the incidence and consequences of MiP [8,9,10,11,12,13]. Several studies have found that pregnant women who sleep under an ITN have lower odds of contracting malaria when compared to those who do not sleep under an ITN [9,10,11]. Even when other associated factors such as educational status, parity, number of antenatal visits, number of intermittent preventive treatment doses in pregnancy and age are adjusted for, the odds of contracting malaria remain higher among pregnant women who do not sleep under an ITN [9,10,11]. Studies have also shown that sleeping under an ITN is beneficial to the health of pregnant women and their unborn children [11, 12, 14]. For instance, in Kenya using an ITN during pregnancy reduced the incidence of severe maternal anaemia by 47%, low birth weight by 28% and maternal malaria parasitemia by 38% [14]. A systematic review of studies conducted in Africa showed that the use of ITNs decreased low birth weight by 23% and reduced fetal loss by 33% [12]. The findings were similar in a meta-analysis that assessed the efficacy of intermittent preventive treatment in pregnancy (IPTp) and the use of ITNs in pregnancy in 25 African countries. The use of IPTp or an ITN during pregnancy were found to reduce the incidence of neonatal mortality and low birth weight in newborns by 82% and 79.2%, respectively in the meta-analysis [8]. They concluded that the use of the two preventive interventions help reduce the incidence of MiP [8].

In areas where malaria is endemic, including Zambia, the WHO recommends the use of ITNs [2]. Zambia put in place a policy for mass distribution of ITN in 2005 [15]. The policy entails routinely distributing ITNs to pregnant women and under-five children [16]. However, despite the Zambian government’s efforts to ensure continual distribution of ITNs to pregnant women, ITN use among pregnant women remains critically below the 80% target set in 2011 [17].

Estimates from the 2018 Zambian Demographic and Health Survey (ZDHS) indicate that 51% of pregnant women did not sleep under an ITN the night before the survey, putting them at risk of contracting malaria. Therefore, determining the factors associated with the non-use of ITNs among pregnant women in Zambia is important for unblocking barriers to ITN use thereby, preventing malaria in this group of women.

Methods

Study setting and design

Zambia is a country in Southern Africa that experiences seasonal malaria transmission [4]. The rainy season (December to April) gives rise to malaria transmission peaks between January and April and the malaria parasite prevalence peak is towards the end of the transmission period (April and May) [4]. This study is a secondary analysis of the population-based cross-sectional data collected during the 2018 ZDHS. The ZDHS occurred between 18 and 2018 and 24 January 2019, which was outside the malaria transmission and parasite prevalence peak periods. Details of the methodology used during the ZDHS are published in the ZDHS report [18]. Thirteen thousand, six hundred and eighty-three women aged 15–49 years were interviewed in the survey. Of these women, 1138 women were pregnant at the time of the survey and they form the analysis sample for this study.

Outcome variable

The outcome variable is binary, which was the use or non-use of an ITN by a pregnant woman. Non-use of an ITN was defined as not sleeping under an ITN the night before the survey. If a pregnant woman slept under an ITN the night before the survey, the code assigned was zero (0) and if a pregnant woman did not sleep under an ITN the night before the survey, the code assigned was one (1).

Explanatory variables

The explanatory variables are age, employment status, ITN per household member, place of residence, parity, educational attainment, religion, marital status, wealth index and province. The literature reviewed aided in the variable selection [19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30]. A detailed description of the variables, codes, and how they are operationalized in this study is presented in Table 1.

Table 1 Description of variables, codes, and reclassifications
Full size table

Statistical analysis

This study’s analysis used sampling weights and survey estimation commands to account for the stratification and clustering in the ZDHS data. For this study, all statistical tests were done at alpha 0.05 and 95% confidence intervals. The software used was STATA SE version 16 (Statacorp LP, College Station, Texas, USA).

To determine the prevalence of the non-use of ITNs among pregnant women aged 15–49 years in Zambia, cross-tabulation of the outcome variable by each of the identified explanatory variables was performed. For this part of the analysis, continuous variables (ITN per household member, age and parity), were categorized. The categorization was done to get the prevalence based on the assigned categories. Details of the categorizations are provided in Table 1.

To determine the factors associated with the non-use of ITNs among pregnant women, univariable and multivariable logistic regression models were fitted. The univariable regressions computed the unadjusted odds ratios, while the multivariable regression computed the adjusted odds ratios. To prevent the loss of power of the explanatory variables and to prevent inflating the type-I error rate [31], continuous variables (ITN per household member, age and parity) were not categorized for this part of the analysis. The variance inflation factor (VIF) was used to check for multi-colinearity. There was no evidence of multi-colinearity as all VIF values were < 10. The religion variable was not entered into the models because those who were Muslims and from other religions other than Christianity, had very few observations, which caused imprecise predictions.

Results

Prevalence of the non-use of ITNs among pregnant women

Table 2 shows the prevalence of non-use of ITNs among pregnant women in Zambia. Overall, 50.8% of the pregnant women did not use an ITN the night before the survey with 43.6% (252 of 578) of the women not having an ITN in their household and only 16.6% (96 of 578) having sufficient/more than sufficient ITNs. The prevalence of women who did not use an ITN decreased as the ITN per household member increased. The result is similar for age and parity of the pregnant women where prevalence of non-use decreases with increase in age and parity. Table 2 further shows that the prevalence of non-use of ITNs was high among pregnant women who have some level of education, live in urban area, are employed, are Christians, are non-poor, are from low malaria prevalence provinces and pregnant women who were never in union.

Table 2 Prevalence of the non-use of ITNs among pregnant women
Full size table

Factors associated with the non-use of ITNs among pregnant women

The second column of Table 3 presents the unadjusted odds ratios of the univariable logistic regressions analysis. The results indicate that ITN per household member, age, parity, educational attainment (primary, and secondary), wealth index (non-poor), provincial malaria categories (moderate to high), marital status (currently in a union) were significantly associated with the non-use of ITNs among pregnant women (p < 0.05).

Table 3 Unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios of the association between the explanatory variables and non-use of ITNs
Full size table

The third column of Table 3 shows the adjusted odds ratios computed from the multivariable logistic regression. In this model, ITN per household member, parity, attainment of primary education, not being from a low malaria prevalence province and currently in a union were statistically associated with the non-use of ITNs among pregnant women (p < 0.05).

The odds of not using an ITN decreased as the ITN per household member increased just as the odds of not using decreases with every additional birth. With respect to educational attainment, the odds of not using an ITN among pregnant women who had a primary level of education was 2.13 times the odds of not using an ITN among pregnant women who had no education (95% CI: 1.23–3.68). Furthermore, the odds of not using an ITN among pregnant women from moderate malaria prevalence provinces was 0.34 (95% CI: 0.23–0.50) times less likely than among pregnant women from low malaria prevalence provinces and 0.26 (95% CI: 0.18–0.39) times less likely among pregnant women from high malaria prevalence provinces compared to those from low malaria prevalence provinces.

Regarding marital status, the odds of not using an ITN among pregnant women who were currently in a union were 0.52 (95% CI: 0.30–0.88) times the odds of not using an ITN among pregnant women who had never been in a union. However, age, secondary education, and the household wealth index lost the significance they had in the univariable analysis, although the direction of association remains the same.

Discussion

This study aimed to determine the prevalence of, and the factors associated with the non-use of ITNs among pregnant women in Zambia. The results show that 50.8% of the women did not use an ITN the night before the survey. This is higher than what was reported in the 2018 Zambia Malaria Indicator Survey report [34]. The high percentage of non-use is explained by the fact that 43.6% of the pregnant women that did not use an ITN the night before the survey did not have any ITN in their household. The high prevalence may also be explained by the fact that the period during which the ZDHS occurred (18 July 2018–24 January 2019) was mainly outside the malaria transmission peak period (January–April) and the peak parasite prevalence period (April–May) [18]. Therefore, the timing of the ZDHS may not have allowed for better compliance to use ITNs. Other studies have noted that ITN use could be seasonal and influenced by factors such as temperature, rain and the density of mosquitoes [35,36,37,38,39].

As per the criterion of 0.5 ITN per household member being sufficient (one ITN for every two persons at risk of malaria) [2, 40], this study showed that only 16.6% of the pregnant women had a sufficient number of ITNs in their household. This could have also contributed to the lower odds of using an ITN [22]. Verifiably, this study found that the odds of not using an ITN decrease as the ITN per household member ratio increases. The finding is plausible because owning sufficient ITNs in the household may ensure that every household member, including pregnant women, sleep under an ITN [22, 41]. This is consistent with studies done in Mali [22] and Malawi [30]. Additionally, it was found that as parity increases, the odds of not using an ITN decreases. This finding is similar to studies done in Uganda [21] and Malawi [30]. The finding may be because pregnant women with more deliveries are more aware of the risks of malaria and the importance of ITN use [21].

This study found that those with some level of education, especially, primary level had higher odds of not using an ITN compared to those with no education. This differs from what was found in studies done in Nigeria, Congo, and Uganda [20, 21, 26], that showed that individuals with no education were less likely to use an ITN. Although, not significant, the non-poor pregnant women also had higher odds of not using an ITN. The education and wealth findings may be because the women in these categories were using other malaria preventative measures such as intermittent preventive treatment in pregnancy (IPTp) or living in better vector-controlled environment.

Further, pregnant women in low malaria prevalence provinces were less likely to use an ITN. This finding is in line with several studies that point out the regional variability of ITN use [30, 42, 43]. Unlike the low transmission provinces, the moderate to high malaria prevalence provinces are the wetter provinces of Zambia [3], with more persistent vector breeding pools and higher mosquito densities. This may explain why pregnant women from these provinces were more likely to use an ITN compared to women from the low malaria prevalence provinces.

This study found that marital status was associated with the non-use of ITNs among pregnant women. The result is in line with two studies done in Kenya and Congo that found that pregnant women in a union are more likely to use an ITN [24, 44]. The findings indicate that pregnant women who had never been in a union are less likely to use an ITN. A possible explanation is that pregnant women in union may be influenced by their partner’s decision to practise malaria prevention behaviours [45]. Additionally, women that had never been in a union tend to be younger, less likely to have had a prior pregnancy and prior exposure to information about the risks of malaria or the importance of ITN use during pregnancy [21, 23].

Strengths of the study

This study used a nationally representative sample of pregnant women. Therefore, the study findings may be generalized to pregnant women in Zambia. Additionally, the study was able to account for the complex nature of the ZDHS sample design by using survey estimation commands in STATA. Thereby, improving the accuracy of the study estimates.

Study limitations

The non-use of ITNs the night before the ZDHS survey might have been overestimated or underestimated in this study, because (1) it was self-reported in the survey and may therefore suffer from social desirability bias, and (2) the 2018 ZDHS occurred outside the malaria transmission peak period in Zambia. Hence, some of the pregnant women may be users of ITNs during other times of the year. In addition, not all the variables that needed to be adjusted for were included in the analysis. For instance, the 2018 ZDHS did not collect information on the knowledge and beliefs about malaria, seasonality of malaria and weather conditions in Zambia, which have been shown to influence ITN utilization [20, 26, 29, 46]. Further, religion, which has been shown to influence ITN use in other settings [24, 47] was not used in the models due to the variable having very few observations for the Muslim/Other category.

Policy implications and recommendations

The study shows a high prevalence of the non-use of ITNs among pregnant women in Zambia with over two-fifths of the non-users having no ITN and only 16.6% having a sufficient number of ITNs in their household. This shows a need to expand ITN distribution programming to reach all the pregnant women that need them. Further, although the survey was conducted in malaria off season period in the country, it is important to increase and sustain the use of ITN during pregnancy as the risk of contracting malaria among the group is not totally absent.

The factors found to be associated with the non-use of ITNs in this study suggest areas that need to be targeted for optimizing malaria prevention efforts. Finding less likelihood of not using an ITN with increase in number of ITN per household member also points to the need to increase ITN supply to households. The ITN distribution systems need to consider the number of household members to ensure that households own sufficient ITNs.

This study found a decline in non-use with increase in parity and higher odds of non-use among pregnant women that were never in a union. There is a need to have targeted and intensified ITN programming among this group as they tend to be young and may not have prior exposure to pregnancy or information about the risks of malaria or the importance of ITN use during pregnancy.

The finding of higher odds of using ITNs in the moderate to high malaria prevalence provinces, suggests that the women are aware of the dangers of contracting malaria and the importance of using ITN to protect themselves and their unborn children. Thus, intensifying ITN programming in all parts of Zambia, especially in the low malaria prevalence provinces that have shown less likelihood of use is paramount.

The less likelihood of using an ITN by pregnant women with some level of education in this study is concerning as they constitute 94% of the non-users (545 of 578 – see Table 2). However, they may be using other preventive interventions. It is thus, imperative to intensify ITN messaging as well as promote other preventive measures among pregnant women in Zambia.

The high number of pregnant women with no ITN in their household is alarming. Research on the prevalence of ITN ownership and the factors associated with it is recommended to start addressing this concerning issue. Future research on the non-use of ITNs among pregnant women in Zambia should consider exploring why women with some level of education and non-poor women were less likely to use an ITN. Further, adjusting for variables such as knowledge, beliefs, and practices about malaria may provide further insight into why pregnant women in Zambia are using or not using ITNs.

In terms of monitoring and evaluation, the factors found to be associated can be used as indicators that track the progress of malaria prevention interventions among pregnant women in Zambia. The continual monitoring of progress will ensure the unblocking of barriers to ITN use thereby, preventing malaria in this group of women.

Conclusion

This study showed a high prevalence of the non-use of ITNs among pregnant women in Zambia. Factors found to be associated with the non-use of ITNs in the study population are: ITN per household member, parity, education, marital status and malaria prevalence provinces. Addressing the identified factors will require intensification of ITN programming and other malaria preventive measures.

Availability of data and materials

The dataset analysed for the current study is available on Demographic and Health Surveys Programme website, https://dhsprogram.com/data/available-datasets.cfm.

Abbreviations

ITN:

Insecticide-treated net

WHO:

World Health Organization

ZDHS:

Zambian Demographic and Health Survey

MiP:

Malaria in pregnancy

References

  1. WHO. World malaria report 2019. Geneva, World Health Organization. 2019. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241565721. Accessed 10 Aug 2020.

  2. WHO: World malaria report 2020: 20 years of global progress and challenges. Geneva, World Health Organization. 2019. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240015791. Accessed 19 May 2021.

  3. United States President’s Malaria Initiative. Zambia malaria operational plan FY 2020. https://www.pmi.gov/docs/default-source/default-document-library/malaria-operational-plans/fy20/fy-2020-zambia-malaria-operational-plan.pdf (2020). Accessed 26 May 2021.

  4. Ministry of Health. National malaria elimination strategic plan 2017–2021. https://static1.squarespace.com/static/58d002f017bffcf99fe21889/t/5b28d7f1575d1ff0942dbce1/1529403401067/National+Malaria+Elimination+Strategic+Plan+2017-Final_PRINT.pdf (2017). Accessed 29 Sep 2020.

  5. Inambao A, Kumar R, Hamainza B, Makasa M, Nielsen C, Inambao AB. Malaria incidence in Zambia, 2013 to 2015: observations from the health management information system. 2017. http://znphi.co.zm/thehealthpress/malaria-incidence-in-zambia-2013-to-2015-observations-from-the-health-management-information-system/. Accessed 30 Dec 2020.

  6. Desai M, Kuile FO, ter, Nosten F, McGready R, Asamoa K, Brabin B, et al. Epidemiology and burden of malaria in pregnancy. Lancet Infect Dis. 2007;7:105–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Taylor SM, Kuile FO ter. Stillbirths: the hidden burden of malaria in pregnancy. Lancet Glob Health. 2017;5:e1052–3.

  8. Eisele TP, Larsen DA, Anglewicz PA, Keating J, Yukich J, Bennett A, et al. Malaria prevention in pregnancy, birthweight, and neonatal mortality: a meta-analysis of 32 national cross-sectional datasets in Africa. Lancet Infect Dis. 2012;12:942–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Touré AA, Doumbouya A, Diallo A, Loua G, Cissé A, Sidibé S, et al. Malaria associated factors among pregnant women in Guinea. J Trop Med. 2019;2019:3925094.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gontie GB, Wolde HF, Baraki AG. Prevalence and associated factors of malaria among pregnant women in Sherkole district, Benishangul Gumuz regional state, West Ethiopia. BMC Infect Dis. 2020;20:573.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Feleke DG, Adamu A, Gebreweld A, Tesfaye M, Demisiss W, Molla G. Asymptomatic malaria infection among pregnant women attending antenatal care in malaria endemic areas of North-Shoa, Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study. Malar J. 2020;19:67.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Gamble C, Ekwaru PJ, Garner P, ter Kuile FO. Insecticide-treated nets for the prevention of malaria in pregnancy: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials. PLoS Med. 2007;4:e107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Njagi JK, Magnussen P, Estambale B, Ouma J, Mugo B. Prevention of anaemia in pregnancy using insecticide-treated bednets and sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine in a highly malarious area of Kenya: a randomized controlled trial. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2003;97:277–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. ter Kuile FO, Terlouw DJ, Phillips-Howard PA, Hawley WA, Friedman JF, Kariuki SK, et al. Reduction of malaria during pregnancy by permethrin-treated bed nets in an area of intense perennial malaria transmission in western Kenya. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2003;68(4 Suppl):50–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Masaninga F, Mukumbuta N, Ndhlovu K, Hamainza B, Wamulume P, Chanda E, et al. Insecticide-treated nets mass distribution campaign: benefits and lessons in Zambia. Malar J. 2018;17:173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Nawa M, Hangoma P, Morse AP, Michelo C. Investigating the upsurge of malaria prevalence in Zambia between 2010 and 2015: a decomposition of determinants. Malar J. 2019;18:61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ministry of Health. National malaria control programme strategic plan for fy 2011 2015, report. https://extranet.who.int/countryplanningcycles/sites/default/files/planning_cycle_repository/zambia/zambia_malaria_nsp_2011-2015_.pdf (2011). Accessed 10 Sep 2020.

  18. Ministry of Health. Zambia demographic and health survey 2018. https://www.dhsprogram.com/pubs/pdf/FR361/FR361.pdf (2020). Accessed 10 Jun 2020.

  19. Ankomah A, Adebayo SB, Arogundade ED, Anyanti J, Nwokolo E, Ladipo O, et al. Determinants of insecticide-treated net ownership and utilization among pregnant women in Nigeria. BMC Public Health. 2012;12:105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Inungu JN, Ankiba N, Minelli M, Mumford V, Bolekela D, Mukoso B, et al. Use of insecticide-treated mosquito net among pregnant women and guardians of children under five in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. Malar Res Treat. 2017;2017:5923696.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Muhumuza E, Namuhani N, Balugaba BE, Namata J, Ekirapa Kiracho E. Factors associated with use of malaria control interventions by pregnant women in Buwunga subcounty, Bugiri District. Malar J. 2016;15:342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Hill J, Kayentao K, Touré M, Diarwara S, Bruce J, Smedley J, et al. Effectiveness of antenatal clinics to deliver intermittent preventive treatment and insecticide treated nets for the control of malaria in pregnancy in Mali: a household survey. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e92102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Mbengue MAS, Bei AK, Mboup A, Ahouidi A, Sarr M, Mboup S, et al. Factors influencing the use of malaria prevention strategies by women in Senegal: a cross-sectional study. Malar J. 2017;16:470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Choonara S, Odimegwu CO, Elwange BC. Factors influencing the usage of different types of malaria prevention methods during pregnancy in Kenya. Afr Health Sci. 2015;15:413–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Belay M, Deressa W. Use of insecticide treated nets by pregnant women and associated factors in a pre-dominantly rural population in northern Ethiopia. Trop Med Int Health. 2008;13:1303–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Ezire O, Adebayo SB, Idogho O, Bamgboye EA, Nwokolo E. Determinants of use of insecticide-treated nets among pregnant women in Nigeria. Int J Womens Health. 2015;7:655–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Wafula ST, Mendoza H, Nalugya A, Musoke D, Waiswa P. Determinants of uptake of malaria preventive interventions among pregnant women in eastern Uganda. Malar J. 2021;20:5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Leonard N, Eric FB, Judith A-KK, Samuel W. Factors associated to the use of insecticide treated nets and intermittent preventive treatment for malaria control during pregnancy in Cameroon. Arch Public Health. 2012;74:5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Ankomah A, Adebayo SB, Arogundade ED, Anyanti J, Nwokolo E, Inyang U, et al. The effect of mass media campaign on the use of insecticide-treated bed nets among pregnant women in Nigeria. Malar Res Treat. 2014;2014:694863.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Nkoka O, Chuang T-W, Chuang K-Y, Chen Y-H. Factors associated with insecticide-treated net usage among women of childbearing age in Malawi: a multilevel analysis. Malar J. 2018;17:372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Austin P, Brunner L. Inflation of the type I error rate when a continuous confounding variable is categorized in logistic regression analyses. Stat Med. 2004;23:1159–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Bigelow CA, Khander A, Robles BN, Rekawek P, Cadet J, Pan S, et al. Grand multiparity and great grand multiparity: obstetric risks in a contemporary cohort. Am J Obst Gynecol. 2019;220:105–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Çevik S, Yılmaz H, Kaplan A, Yetkinel S, Evran Ş, Çalış F, et al. Association between parity and lumbar spine degenerative disorders in young women. Brit J Neurosurg. 2020;34:172–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Ministry of Health. Zambia national malaria indicator survey 2018. https://www.malariasurveys.org/documents/Zambia_MIS2018_FINAL-withSigs_20190415.pdf (2018). Accessed on 17 Sep 2020.

  35. Pulford J, Hetzel MW, Bryant M, Siba PM, Mueller I. Reported reasons for not using a mosquito net when one is available: a review of the published literature. Malar J. 2011;10:83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Pinchoff J, Hamapumbu H, Kobayashi T, Simubali L, Stevenson J, Norris D, et al. Factors associated with sustained use of long-lasting insecticide-treated nets following a reduction in malaria transmission in Southern Zambia. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2015;93:954–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Hill J, Hoyt J, Eijk AM van, D’Mello-Guyett L, Kuile FO ter, Steketee R, et al. Factors affecting the delivery, access, and use of interventions to prevent malaria in pregnancy in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Med. 2013;10:e1001488.

  38. Smithuis FM, Kyaw MK, Phe UO, van der Broek I, Katterman N, Rogers C, et al. The effect of insecticide-treated bed nets on the incidence and prevalence of malaria in children in an area of unstable seasonal transmission in western Myanmar. Malar J. 2013;12:363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Koenker H, Taylor C, Burgert-Brucker CR, Thwing J, Fish T, Kilian A. Quantifying Seasonal Variation in Insecticide-Treated Net Use among Those with Access. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2019 Aug;101(2):371–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Olapeju B, Choiriyyah I, Lynch M, Acosta A, Blaufuss S, Filemyr E, et al. Age and gender trends in insecticide-treated net use in sub-Saharan Africa: a multi-country analysis. Malar J. 2018;17:423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Babalola S, Ricotta E, Awantang G, Lewicky N, Koenker H, Toso M. Correlates of intra-household ITN use in Liberia: a multilevel analysis of household survey data. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:e0158331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Endo N, Eltahir EAB. Environmental determinants of malaria transmission in African villages. Malar J. 2016;15:578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Tassembedo M, Coulibaly S, Ouedrago B. Factors associated with the use of insecticide-treated nets: analysis of the 2018 Burkina Faso malaria indicator survey. 2020. https://www.dhsprogram.com/pubs/pdf/WP169/WP169.pdf. Accessed 30 May 2021.

  44. Song JS, Paul MM, Dhakal S, Smith MK, Michel MK, Cha E, et al. Analysis of insecticide-treated net use by pregnant women: implications for donor organizations. J Lifestyle Med. 2016;6:36–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Aberese-Ako M, Magnussen P, Ampofo GD, Tagbor H. Health system, socio-cultural, economic, environmental and individual factors influencing bed net use in the prevention of malaria in pregnancy in two Ghanaian regions. Malar J. 2019;18:363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Balami AD, Said SM, Zulkefli NAM, Bachok N, Audu B. Effects of a health educational intervention on malaria knowledge, motivation, and behavioural skills: a randomized controlled trial. Malar J Malaria Journal. 2019 Feb;20:18:41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Yaya S, Bishwajit G, Ekholuenetale M, Shah V, Kadio B, Udenigwe O. Knowledge of prevention, cause, symptom and practices of malaria among women in Burkina Faso. PLoS ONE. 2017;12:e0180508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge the Special Programme for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases (TDR) that funded this work and the Demographic and Health Surveys Programme for granting the permission to use this data set.

Funding

The TDR, the Special Programme for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases, hosted at the World Health Organization and co-sponsored by UNICEF, UNDP, the World Bank, and WHO, funded this research project. TDR grant number: B40299. First author ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1695-2992.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa

    Luwi Mercy Mwangu, Relebogile Mapuroma & Latifat Ibisomi

  2. Nigerian Institute of Medical Research, Lagos, Nigeria

    Latifat Ibisomi

Authors
  1. Luwi Mercy Mwangu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Relebogile Mapuroma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Latifat Ibisomi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

LMM devised the study and conducted the literature review, data analysis, interpretation of the data, and the drafting of the manuscript. LI co-conceptualized the research. LI and RM supervised the literature review, data analysis and interpretation process as well as the manuscript preparation. All authors reviewed and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luwi Mercy Mwangu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The Human Research Ethics Committee at the University of the Witwatersrand gave the ethical clearance to conduct this study (certificate number M210139). The ZDHS data are anonymized, and authorization to use the 2018 ZDHS data set was granted through the Demographic and Health Surveys Programme website.

Consent for publication

Not Applicable.

Competing interests

None.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mwangu, L.M., Mapuroma, R. & Ibisomi, L. Factors associated with non-use of insecticide-treated bed nets among pregnant women in Zambia. Malar J 21, 290 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-022-04313-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-022-04313-4

Keywords

  • Zambia
  • Zambian Demographic and Health Survey (ZDHS)
  • Non-use of ITNs
  • Prevalence
  • Factors associated with
  • Pregnant women

Malaria Journal

ISSN: 1475-2875

Contact us