Skip to main content
Download PDF

Impact of insecticide resistance on malaria vector competence: a literature review

Malaria Journal volume 22, Article number: 19 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Since its first report in Anopheles mosquitoes in 1950s, insecticide resistance has spread very fast to most sub-Saharan African malaria-endemic countries, where it is predicted to seriously jeopardize the success of vector control efforts, leading to rebound of disease cases. Supported mainly by four mechanisms (metabolic resistance, target site resistance, cuticular resistance, and behavioural resistance), this phenomenon is associated with intrinsic changes in the resistant insect vectors that could influence development of invading Plasmodium parasites. A literature review was undertaken using Pubmed database to collect articles evaluating directly or indiretly the impact of insecticide resistance and the associated mechanisms on key determinants of malaria vector competence including sialome composition, anti-Plasmodium immunity, intestinal commensal microbiota, and mosquito longevity. Globally, the evidence gathered is contradictory even though the insecticide resistant vectors seem to be more permissive to Plasmodium infections. The actual body of knowledge on key factors to vectorial competence, such as the immunity and microbiota communities of the insecticide resistant vector is still very insufficient to definitively infer on the epidemiological importance of these vectors against the susceptible counterparts. More studies are needed to fill important knowledge gaps that could help predicting malaria epidemiology in a context where the selection and spread of insecticide resistant vectors is ongoing.

Background

Malaria is the biggest killer among vector-borne diseases [1] and has claimed the lives of milllions of people over centuries [2]. In 2020, 241 million cases were reported leading to 627,000 deaths. The African region has paid the highest tributes with 96% of all deaths [3]. Malaria disease is caused by Plasmodium parasites, which are transmitted to humans by the bites of infected female mosquitoes of the genus Anopheles [4]. In Africa, Plasmodium falciparum is the most epidemiologically important of malaria parasites infecting humans [5], and Anopheles gambiae, Anopheles coluzzii, Anopheles funestus and Anopheles arabiensis are the dominant vector species [6].

Malaria control includes medical treatment of cases and protective measures against the vectors to prevent and/or limit contacts with human hosts during which transmission occurs. The control of mosquito populations on a large scale using insecticide-treated nets (ITNs) and indoor residual spraying, associated with increase case management, has led to a remarkable reduction in malaria burden from 81.1 cases per 1000 population in 2000 to 58.9 in 2015 [3]. After this period, the impact of control efforts on malaria burden have dwindled, coinciding with the spread of insecticide resistant vectors across most endemic countries [3, 7]. Resistance of Anopheles mosquitoes to insecticides, reported for the first time in Africa in the 1950s [7], concerns four main classes of insecticides used in public health for vector control purposes, namely pyrethroids, organochlorines, organophosphates and carbamates [7, 8]. There are four mechanisms deployed by mosquitoes to become insensitive to the insecticides, including by order of importance (1) degradation of insecticide molecules by detoxification enzymes (metabolic resistance), (2) modification of the target affinity of the insecticide (target site resistance), (3) reduced penetration of the insecticide (cuticular resistance) and, (4) avoidance of insecticide-treated surfaces (behavioural resistance). Of these four mechanisms target site and metabolic resistances are most likely to lead to control failure [9].

In target site resistance, a change (leucine changed to a phenylalanine or a serine at position 1014) occurring in the amino acid sequence of the voltage gate sodium channel (vgsc) leads to a reduced sensitivity of mosquitoes to pyrethroids and organochlorines. This phenotype is known as knock down resistance or kdr [10, 11]. When the amino acid change (glycine replaced by serine at position 119) occurs in the neurotransmitter acetyl-cholinesterase, it occasions resistance to organophosphates and carbamates, termed ace-1 resistance [12, 13]. About metabolic resistance, insecticide resistant mosquitoes increase the expression of detoxification enzymes, such as the cytochrome P450 monooxygenases, glutathione S-transferases (GSTs) and esterases, that eliminates xenobiotic compounds (including insecticides) before they reach their target. In another instance, an amino acid substitutions in the sequence of detoxification enzymes could modifiy its affinity with the insecticides in insect vectors [14]. For example, several cytochrome P450 genes (CYP6P9a, CYP6P9b and CYP6M7) are involved in resistance to pyrethroids in the species An. funestus [15, 16]; while a substitution of leucine by phenylalanine at position 119 in the epsilon class of GST (GST2- L119F) confers a cross-resistance to dichloro-diphenyl-trichloroethane (DDT) and pyrethroids in the same vector species [17].

Despite the widespread distribution of insecticide resistance, its impact on overall malaria epidemiology remains unclear and is currently a subject of intense debate. The evaluation of the potential impact of insecticide resistance on vectorial competence is therefore becoming an important and urgent research theme whose findings will help understanding whether it alters or enhances the permissiveness of malaria vectors to Plasmodium parasites, from its early stage (ookinete) to the infective form (sporozoite). In this review, the evidence of insecticide resistance impact on the infectivity of mosquitoes to Plasmodium was explored in the literature, and changes in intrinsic factors that could predict or explain the outcome of an infectious blood meal intake were broached. Finally, the knowledge gaps were pointed out.

Search strategy

A literature search was undertaken in the PubMed database to extract articles addressing the following themes: (1) Plasmodium infection in insecticide resistant malaria vectors, (2) sialome of insecticide resistant malaria vectors, (3) effect of insecticide resistance on the immunity of malaria vectors, (4) microbiota of insecticide resistant malaria vectors and infection, and (5) fitness cost of insecticide resistance in malaria vectors. The first search terms were “Anopheles” and “insecticide resistance” and they were associated with either “Plasmodium infection”, “vector competence”, “salivary gland”, “sialome”, “microbiota”, “gene expression” or “longevity”. Additional articles were extracted from the references lists of the full publications. The search was done between February and August 2022 and there was no restriction regarding the date of publication of the articles. A total of 560 articles were obtained from the search. Articles that addressed insecticide resistance in Anopheles in a broad manner, and not in relation with either Plamodium infection, vector competence, sialome, or longevity were discarded. Therefore, 28 articles related to the themes mentioned above were selected and used for the review.

Malaria vector competence

Vector competence is the intrinsic ability of anopheline species or populations to allow the development of Plasmodium parasites from ookinete to infective sporozoites. When a mosquito takes an infectious blood meal from human, the gametocytes ingested begin their development in the midgut. The male gametocyte transform into eight microgametes after three rounds of mitosis, meanwhile the female gametocytes matures into macrogametes [4]. These cells fuse to form zygotes that thereafter change into ookinetes in the lumen of the intestine. The ookinetes then strive through the epithelium of the midgut and once in its basal side, transform into oocysts. The oocysts undergo several rounds of asexual multiplication (sporogony) leading to the production of thousands of haploid sporozoites in each oocyst. Mature occysts rupture and release sporozoites in the hemocoel, which immediately migrate to the salivary glands. The extrinsic incubation period of the parasite is about 14 days with the transition from ookinetes to mature oocysts having the highest duration (about 10 days) [18, 19].

In mosquito host, Plasmodium face several immune-related bottlenecks deployed to prevent the successful transition from its early stage in the midgut to the sporozoite stage in the salivary glands [18]. The outcome of the parasite infection is reported to depend mainly on the mosquito-Plasmodium genetics adaptation [19, 20]. Another very important factor that influences the above outcome is the compatibility of the duration of parasite development with the longevity of the mosquitoes [21, 22]. Only species in which Plasmodium reaches infective form are referred to as competent vectors and could ensure malaria transmission. The impact of vector competence on the transmission of malaria can be estimated using Ro (Fig. 1), the basic reproductive number developed by McDonald in 1957. The McDonald model gives the threshold for a disease to persist or spread (Ro greater than 1) or to disappear (Ro less than 1) [23]. The Ro represents the number of individuals in a susceptible human population that are expected to get infected via a mosquito bite when a single infected individual is present in the population [24, 25]. In the Ro equation, two parameters are related to vector competence: probability of mosquito infection (b) and mosquito longevity (p) (Fig. 1). Modifications of the values of components of this equation for a given vector population will cause either an augmentation or reduction in the transmission dynamics of the disease, leading probably to a change in the epidemiological profile of the locality concerned. It was established that an increase in b will increase the Ro, whereas a decrease in p will cause the opposite [26].

Fig. 1
figure 1

Basic reporductive number (Ro), Ross-MacDonald model. In bold, parameters of the vectorial competence influenced by insecticide resistance

Full size image

Insecticide resistance and malaria vector infectivity to Plasmodium parasite

The rapid spread of insecticide resistance among malaria vectors accross endemic countries in the past decade have raised several questions among which that of knowing what is its impact on mosquito permissiveness to Plasmodium? Only a limited number of studies have tried to elucidate this question [27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35]. These studies compared P. falciparum infection rates in resistant Anopheline vectors with susceptible ones, either caught in the field or experimentally infected (Table 1).

Table 1 Summary of studies evaluating the impact of insecticide resistance on malaria vectors susceptibility to P. falciparum infection
Full size table

Anopheles gambiae strain bearing kdr resistance allele (Vgsc-L1014S) was found naturally more infected by sporozoites than the susceptible counterpart [27]. Similar findings were experimentally observed in the same species, as well as in Anopheles coluzzii [30, 32]. Contrary to kdr resistance, An. gambiae with ace-1 resistance allele did not differ from individuals that have the wild type allele (not conferring insecticide resistance) on infection rate despite significantly higher oocyst prevalences were observed in the resistant strain [32]. More studies using field populations are needed to ascertain whether a lower longevity suspected by the author and/or other factors are involved.

Regarding metabolic resistance, recent breakthroughs in designing simple PCR-based assays to detect glutathione S-transferase (GST)-based and cytochrome P450-mediated resistance in An. funestus sensu stricto provided a unique opportunity to assess its impact on the mosquito’s ability to develop the parasites. The L119F-GSTe2 resistant genotypes of this species showed, in an experimental infection study, higher permissiveness to oocyst infections than susceptible ones [31]. Similarly, in naturally infected populations of the same species, homozygote L119F-GSTe2 genotypes were found more infected by sporozoites though no significant difference was found at the level of oocyst prevalence [28]. In other hands, Lo and Coetzee [36], infecting experimentally two selected sub-colonies of FUMOZ displaying different degree of pyrethroid resistance by Plasmodium berghei, found that the insecticide resistant colonies were less permissive to infection than the susceptible ones. No investigation has so far explored the relationship between P450s genes implicated in insecticide resistance and P. falciparum infection in An. funestus. Moreover, because of the absence of markers of metabolic resistance in An. gambiae sensu lato such studies are still lacking in these species.

Impact of insecticide resistance on mosquito sialome

Bloodsucking arthropods, like mosquitoes, have evolved saliva containing a mixture of pharmacologically active molecules that help them counteract the hemostatis and inflammatory responses of the vertebrate host during bites, thus facilitating blood meal intake [37]. However, the activity of these molecules goes beyond the scope of ensuring blood meal success, as they possibly influence the completion of Plasmodium development in the salivary gland of malaria vectors. Proteins secreted by the salivary gland belong to several families (D7, mucin, gSG1, gSG2, gSG6 peptide, gSG7, cE5, 8.2-kDa, 6.2-kDa, etc.) [38] whose function include (1) cytoskeletal and structural activities (2) digestion, (3) circadian rythm and chemosensory, (3) immunity, (4) metabolism and other [39]. The development of insecticide resistance in malaria vectors is accompanied by physiological changes [26] that may affect the sialome composition with consequences on the vector competence. Few studies have investigated changes in the sialome in the insecticide resistant vectors [40, 41].

The secretory protein 100 kDa, which is encoded by Saglin (a cytoskeletal and structural gene present in An. gambiae salivary gland) was considered as the binding target of P. falciparum and P. berghei on salivary gland prior to penetration into the latter [42]. This protein was found down-regulated in ace-1 bearing An. gambiae strain, suggesting an impact on the vector infectivity to Plasmodium [43]. However, a recent study showed that the 100 kDa Protein is unevenly distributed on the salivary glands lobes. Its absence on the primary site of sporozoites occupancy in the salivary glands, the distal lateral lobes, implies that this protein may instead have a secondary role in the infection of the organ [44,45,46].

The D7 salivary family has been identified in malaria vectors among the most expressed proteins involved in the antihemostatic activity and probably in digestion of blood meal [47,48,49,50]. Elanga et al. [40] showed that two short forms of the D7 family genes (D7r3 and D7r4) are over-expressed in pyrethroid resistant An. funestus (L119F-GSTe2), whereas almost all D7 genes are under-expressed in pyrethroid resistant An. gambiae (kdr, L1014F). A comparable observation was made in insecticide resistant Culex quinquefasciatus (ace-1 resistance) [51] as well as in two strains of Aedes aegypti (homozygotes resistant C1534 and G1016 kdr) [52]. These findings show that insecticide resistance mechanism may affect the sialome composition differently.

Several immune proteins such as the anti-microbial peptides cecropin and defensin were found in the saliva of mosquitoes [39, 53]. These immune proteins underscore the role of the salivary gland in the refractoriness of the Anopheles to infections [39, 53]. The small number of studies that evaluated the impact of insecticide resistance alleles on salivary gland gene expression in mosquito vectors have not reported significant changes related to immune genes as compared with the susceptible counterparts [41, 43, 51, 52], alluding that the resistant status to insecticide does not influence noticeably the immune component of the sialome. If these factors are indeed unchanged regardless of the mosquito allelic composition, nothing is known whether under infection the expression profile of these immune proteins will vary or not according to the mosquito genotype. Das et al. [39] and Djegbe et al. [51] demonstrated that salivary gland genes expression is influenced by blood meal intake and varies towards the period coinciding with the maturation of Plasmodium parasites in mosquitoes [54]. This evidence was not previously studied and should be taken into account in subsequent research works that aims at identifying differentially expressed genes of the salivary gland and elucidating their impact on the malaria vector competence.

Impact of insecticide resistance on vector immunity

When the infectious blood meal reaches the midgut of the female Anopheles, the immune system is deployed to prevent infections [20]. In the midgut, P. falciparum faces the peritrophic membrane, a physical barrier developed to prevent infections. It also protects against the damaging effects of the human blood factors like antibodies and regulates several digestive enzymes [55, 56]. Enzymes such as trypsin 1 and 2, chymotrypsin, carboxypeptidase, aminopeptidase and serine protease are upregulated during digestion to cleave the large content of proteins in the blood meal [57,58,59,60]. These proteases are apparently involved in the elimination of Plasmodium infections [61]. Three studies attempted to elucidate the effect of insecticide resistance on vectors’ immunity [62,63,64]. Mitri et al. [62], in a study evaluating genes implicated in the infectivity of An. coluzzii, demonstrated that the kdr-bearing para gene which carries mutations of the voltage-gate sodium channel (confering insecticide resistance) is not associated with infection but rather the ClipC9 gene directing the synthesis of Serine protease. This suggest that the effect of the resistant character on refractoriness to infection may be due to genes other than that involved in resistance to insecticides, and which happen to be linked to it. The Serine protease plays an important role in the activation of the three major immune signaling pathways in mosquitoes: Toll, Imd and JAK/STAT [20], which cause the release of antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) notably defensins, cecropins, attacin, gambicin and AgSTAT-A, effective against malaria parasites infections. Vontas et al. [63], using pyrethroid and organochlorine resistant An. gambiae strains, showed that defensin and cecropin are upregulated after pre-exposure to permethrin. This study sugggests that insecticide resistant mosquitoes may be better equipped than susceptible ones to combat infections, but these two immune effectors alone may not be decisive in rendering the vector completely refractory to malaria infections as many other pathways activated concomitantly during parasitic invasion are altogether implicated in the outcome of a contamination [20].

In Culex pipiens which is vector of many pathogens including arboviruses [65], filarial worms [66], and protozoa [67], immune response was stimulated in an insecticide resistant field strain by injection of Lipopolysacharide (LPS) immune elicitor. As result, no difference was found in the expression of defensin and cecropin as compared to the control group; but only an increase in gambicin was recorded [68]. One point can be drawn from these results to infer what might happen in malaria vectors: Plasmodium infections may trigger the overexpresion of some immune factors while the other may have their expression either down regulated or unchanged.

The reactive oxygen species (ROS) produced by cellular metabolism are another class of effectors of the innate immunity that can negatively affect malaria parasites [69, 70]. They kill the parasites through both lytic and melanization pathways [20]. Ingaham et al. [64] showed that An. coluzzii VK7 colony displaying kdr resistance mechanism, CYP6M6 and CYP6P3 metabolisers, had oxidoreductase overexpressed after sub-lethal exposure to deltamethrin, suggesting that this species could be more refractory to Plasmodium infection. At this point, it is necessary to verify whether under natural conditions, insecticide-resistant Anopheles mosquitoes will display an overexpression of ROS or not.

Cellular immune responses are carried out by varous type of hemocytes that eliminate pathogens by phagocytosis, lysis and melanization [20]. Organochlorines and organophosphate were found to affect differently the hemocytes abundance including granulocytes in the insect Rhynocoris kumarii [71]. In mosquitoes, studies are needed to ascertain the impact of insecticide resistance on cellular immunity and the resulting effect on the infectivity of resistant vector to malaria parasite. Regarding melanization of pathogens, it is lead by the phenoloxidase (PO) produced by Oenocytoids [72, 73] and is regulated by serine protease inhibitors. In field-caught C. pipiens resistant to insecticide through an increase in detoxification (esterase) and target site mutation (ace-1), PO expression was equal to that of susceptible group [74], suggesting that some genes associated with immunity might not be affected by insecticide resistance character in mosquitoes. No studies have verified the effect of insecticide resistance on PO in malaria vectors.

Impact of insecticide resistance on commensal intestinal microbiota of malaria vectors

Bacteria, fungi and viruses colonize the gut, salivary glands and reproductive organs of the mosquitoes. These microorganisms are mainly acquired from the environnement and its composition is largely influenced by its aquatic breeding sites [75, 76]. In addition, the microbiota composition is highly dynamic, varying greatly with localities and seasons [77,78,79]. These variations of microbiota composition within field mosquitoes may partly explain the variability in infection levels in the field [80].

Mosquito microbiota has great potential for impeding the transmission of malaria by altering vectorial capacity [81]. Also, the microbiota is capable of influencing the biology of the host such as altering its immunity, nutrition, digestion, vectorial competence, reproduction, and insecticide resistance [82,83,84,85,86,87]. With the growing concerns about the rapid spread of insecticide resistance in Anopheles mosquitoes, some studies have explored the functions of the mosquito's gut microbial communities in the development of resistance. For example, distinct microbita populations were found associated with organochlorine resistance in An. arabiensis [86] and Anopheles albimanus [88]. Similarly, an association between specific microbiota and intense pyrethroid resistance was reported in An. gambiae [89] and Anopheles stephensi [90], suggesting a microbiota-mediated insecticide resistance mechanism. Dieme et al. [91] suggested that changes in the feeding behaviour of insecticide resistant vectors may lead to higher microbial diversity. This diversity could modify the repertoire of protective bacteria against pathogen infections and/or that of their enhancers, with consequences on the vectorial competence [9, 92]. Recently, Bassene et al. [93] showed that, in the species An. gambiae and An. funestus, the microbiota was signifanctly different between P. falciparum-infected and non-infected samples, although the resistance status of these mosquitoes was not evaluated. More refined studies are needed to characterize the microbial communities harboured by the insecticide resistant malaria vectors. Also the contribution of microbiota against other factors to the vectorial competence of insecticide resistant malaria vectors remains to be investigated.

Impact of insecticide resistance on the longevity of malaria vectors

Mosquito longevity is a determinant factor for parasite maturation and could influences malaria transmission [94, 95]. In fact, the extrinsic incubation of Plasmodium in its hematophageous host is about 11–14 days. Therefore, only mosquitoes whose lifespan is long enough could allow the complete development of the malaria parasite to the sporozoite infective stage and participate in the transmission of the disease. With the emergence and spread of insecticide resistance [7], many investigations were undertaken to gain knowledge of the effect of this phenomenon on the vectors’ longevity and so on its potential epidemiological impact.

So far, studies on the impact of insecticide resistance on malaria vectors longevity have focused on four species: An. gambiae, An. arabiensis, An. coluzzii and An. funestus. Globally, the findings revealed a pleitropic effect of insecticide resistance on mosquito lifespan [33, 96,97,98,99,100,101,102,103,104,105,106,107,108] (Table 2). The majority of studies (10/14) which used laboratory strains showed that pyrethroid resistant An. funestus and An. gambiae live longer than susceptible ones [100, 106]. Of the studies including field strains, a longer life span was reported in organochlorine and pyrethroid resistant An. funestus strains [104, 105]. In contrast, a shorter life span was observed in An. gambiae strain resistant to organochlorine. It was reported that pre-exposure to insecticide in a manner micmicing field exposure to insecticides, affects the longevity of insecticide resistant An. gambiae strain [97], and that delayed mortality observed in the vectors may be dependent on resistance intensity [98]. This later observation indicates that findings obtained with laboratory colonies are to be taken with caution given that they may not reflect exactly what is oberved on the field [26]. Nevertheless, such studies remain important as they contribute to the understanding of the potential mechanisms affecting the vectors’ longevity [109, 110], notably resource-based trade-off and oxidative stress.

Table 2 Summary of studies assessing the impact of insecticide resistance on the longevity of malaria vectors
Full size table

Resource based trade-off is an evolutionary ecology concept that states that when environmental constraints lead to the augmentation of resources to one biological trait, other traits will have their energy budget reduced [111]. Accordingly, when mosquitoes adopt the detoxification mechanism to prevent the effect of insecticide, an increased production of detoxifying enzymes follows and is maintained by the additional resources deployed for the function. Otali et al. [100] have demonstrated that metabolism and longevity of insecticide resistant An. gambiae are lower than that of the susceptible strain. Moreover, they showed that the resistant strain has higher Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS), which are factors determining oxydative stress. In fact, the ROS are multifunctional molecules produced by cells of all organisms during normal metabolism [112, 113]. They have been pointed out as key aging factor in other organisms including Anopheles [114]. Therefore, mosquitoes that develop the capacity to cope with oxydative stress are likely to live longer. Oliver and Brooke [103] in an experiment evaluating the effect of oxidative stress on the longevity of both An. arabiensis and An. funestus bearing respectively kdr and Cytochrome P450 mechanisms demonstrated that these species live longer, and that Cytochrome P450 activity seems more protective against oxydative stress.

Rivero et al. [26] proposed the potential effect of different detoxifying enzymes on vector longevity. For example, Glutathion S-Transferase is considered to protect against oxydative stress. Confirming this point, a longer lifespan implicating Glutathion S-Tranferase in An. funestus was revealed with and without exposure to insecticide [104, 105]. In contrast, monoxygenase, known to be associated with an increase in oxydative stress has not led, as expected, to reduced longevity in An. funestus [108]. More studies using field populations and micmicing field conditions are necessary to ascertain the full impact of insecticide resistance on longevity of the malaria vector.

Conclusion

The need for a comprehensive understanding of the impact of insecticide resistance on malaria vector competence is unquestionable. The current state of knowledge is not only insufficient but also contradictory to draw a definitive conclusion. A tendency nevertheless emerges from findings that insecticide resistance may increases the infectivity of malaria vectors to Plasmodium, thus their vector competence. This is possibly due to changes in the expression of some genes notably those involved in blood-feeding and the immunity. Additionally, microbiota communities vary in the resistant mosquitoes as compared to the susceptible counterparts. The actual effect of these changes in the course of infection and their impact on the infectivity of malaria vectors to P. falciparum is still to be investigated. Finally, the longevity of the vectors is not always affected by insecticide resistance mechanisms. It is worth noting that, studies using vectors displaying metabolic resistance were under-represented because molecular markers to diagnose this character were developped only recently, especially in An. funestus. Malaria vectors that bear metabolic resistant mechanism are, on an ecological immunology point of view, expected to have a number of biological functions impaired, including immunity. If established, this situation may cause them to become less refractory to Plasmodium infection. Taking advantage of recent advances in the genomics, transcriptomics and molecular characterization of insecticide resistance, more refined studies can now be undertaken to fill knowledge gaps regarding the effect of insectide resistance on key determinants of vectorial competence and subsequently predict changes in the epidemiology of malaria in a context of insecticide resistance escalation.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Abbreviations

DDT:

Dichloro-diphenyl-trichloroethane

GST:

Glutathione S-transferases

kdr:

Knock down resistance

LPS:

Lipopolysacharide

PO:

Phenoloxidase

Vgsc:

Voltage gate sodium channel

References

  1. WHO. A global brief on vector-borne diseases. Geneva, World Health Organization; 2014.

  2. Gelband H, Panosian CB, Arrow KJ. Saving lives, buying time: economics of malaria drugs in an age of resistance. 2004.

  3. WHO. World malaria report 2021. Geneva, World Health Organization; 2021.

  4. Phillips M, Burrows J, Manyando C. Malaria. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2017;3:17050.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cox FE. History of the discovery of the malaria parasites and their vectors. Parasit Vectors. 2010;3:5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Sinka ME, Bangs MJ, Manguin S, Rubio-Palis Y, Chareonviriyaphap T, Coetzee M, et al. A global map of dominant malaria vectors. Parasit Vectors. 2012;5:69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Riveron JM, Tchouakui M, Mugenzi L, Menze BD, Chiang M-C, Wondji CS. Insecticide resistance in malaria vectors: an update at a global scale. In Towards malaria elimination-a leap forward. IntechOpen; 2018.

  8. Elliott R, Ramakrishna V. Insecticide resistance in Anopheles gambiae Giles. Nature. 1956;177:532–3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Sheldon BC, Verhulst S. Ecological immunology: costly parasite defences and trade-offs in evolutionary ecology. Trends Ecol Evol. 1996;11:317–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Barnes KG, Weedall GD, Ndula M, Irving H, Mzihalowa T, Hemingway J, et al. Genomic footprints of selective sweeps from metabolic resistance to pyrethroids in African malaria vectors are driven by scale up of insecticide-based vector control. PLoS Genet. 2017;13: e1006539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Donnelly MJ, Corbel V, Weetman D, Wilding CS, Williamson MS, Black WC. Does kdr genotype predict insecticide-resistance phenotype in mosquitoes? Trends Parasitol. 2009;25:213–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Weill M, Lutfalla G, Mogensen K, Chandre F, Berthomieu A, Berticat C, et al. Insecticide resistance in mosquito vectors. Nature. 2003;423:136–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Djogbénou L, Labbé P, Chandre F, Pasteur N, Weill M. Ace-1 duplication in Anopheles gambiae: a challenge for malaria control. Malar J. 2009;8:70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hemingway J, Hawkes NJ, McCarroll L, Ranson H. The molecular basis of insecticide resistance in mosquitoes. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 2004;34:653–65.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Riveron JM, Irving H, Ndula M, Barnes KG, Ibrahim SS, Paine MJ, et al. Directionally selected cytochrome P450 alleles are driving the spread of pyrethroid resistance in the major malaria vector Anopheles funestus. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013;110:252–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Riveron JM, Ibrahim SS, Chanda E, Mzilahowa T, Cuamba N, Irving H, et al. The highly polymorphic CYP6M7 cytochrome P450 gene partners with the directionally selected CYP6P9a and CYP6P9b genes to expand the pyrethroid resistance front in the malaria vector Anopheles funestus in Africa. BMC Genomics. 2014;15:817.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Riveron JM, Yunta C, Ibrahim SS, Djouaka R, Irving H, Menze BD, et al. A single mutation in the GSTe2 gene allows tracking of metabolically based insecticide resistance in a major malaria vector. Genome Biol. 2014;15:R27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Vlachou D, Schlegelmilch T, Runn E, Mendes A, Kafatos FC. The developmental migration of Plasmodium in mosquitoes. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2006;16:384–91.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Levashina EA. Immune responses in Anopheles gambiae. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 2004;34:673–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Söderhäll K. Invertebrate immunity. Springer Science & Business Media; 2011.

  21. Cohuet A, Harris C, Robert V, Fontenille D. Evolutionary forces on Anopheles: what makes a malaria vector? Trends Parasitol. 2010;26:130–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Beier JC. Malaria parasite development in mosquitoes. Annu Rev Entomol. 1998;43:519–43.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Holme P, Masuda N. The basic reproduction number as a predictor for epidemic outbreaks in temporal networks. PLoS ONE. 2015;10: e0120567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Dietz K. The estimation of the basic reproduction number for infectious diseases. Stat Methods Med Res. 1993;2:23–41.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Smith DL, McKenzie FE, Snow RW, Hay SI. Revisiting the basic reproductive number for malaria and its implications for malaria control. PLoS Biol. 2007;5: e42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Rivero A, Vézilier J, Weill M, Read AF, Gandon S. Insecticide control of vector-borne diseases: when is insecticide resistance a problem? PLoS Pathog. 2010;6: e1001000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kabula B, Tungu P, Rippon EJ, Steen K, Kisinza W, Magesa S, et al. A significant association between deltamethrin resistance, Plasmodium falciparum infection and the Vgsc-1014S resistance mutation in Anopheles gambiae highlights the epidemiological importance of resistance markers. Malar J. 2016;15:289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Tchouakui M, Chiang MC, Ndo C, Kuicheu CK, Amvongo-Adjia N, Wondji MJ, et al. A marker of glutathione S-transferase-mediated resistance to insecticides is associated with higher Plasmodium infection in the African malaria vector Anopheles funestus. Sci Rep. 2019;9:5772.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Collins E, Vaselli NM, Sylla M, Beavogui AH, Orsborne J, Lawrence G, et al. The relationship between insecticide resistance, mosquito age and malaria prevalence in Anopheles gambiae s.l. from Guinea. Sci Rep. 2019;9:8846.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Ndiath MO, Cailleau A, Diedhiou SM, Gaye A, Boudin C, Richard V, et al. Effects of the kdr resistance mutation on the susceptibility of wild Anopheles gambiae populations to Plasmodium falciparum: a hindrance for vector control. Malar J. 2014;3:340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Ndo C, Kopya E, Irving H, Wondji C. Exploring the impact of glutathione S-transferase (GST)-based metabolic resistance to insecticide on vector competence of Anopheles funestus for Plasmodium falciparum. Wellcome Open Res. 2019;4:52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Alout H, Ndam NT, Sandeu MM, Djégbe I, Chandre F, Dabiré RK, et al. Insecticide resistance alleles affect vector competence of Anopheles gambiae s.s. for Plasmodium falciparum field isolates. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e63849.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Alout H, Dabiré RK, Djogbénou LS, Abate L, Corbel V, Chandre F, et al. Interactive cost of Plasmodium infection and insecticide resistance in the malaria vector Anopheles gambiae. Sci Rep. 2016;6:29755.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Alout H, Djègbè I, Chandre F, Djogbénou LS, Dabiré RK, Corbel V, et al. Insecticide exposure impacts vector-parasite interactions in insecticide-resistant malaria vectors. Proc Biol Sci. 2014;281:20140389.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Kristan M, Abeku TA, Lines J. Effect of environmental variables and kdr resistance genotype on survival probability and infection rates in Anopheles gambiae (s.s.). Parasit Vectors. 2018;11:560.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Lo TM, Coetzee M. Marked biological differences between insecticide resistant and susceptible strains of Anopheles funestus infected with the murine parasite Plasmodium berghei. Parasit Vectors. 2013;6:184.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Ribeiro JM, Francischetti IM. Role of arthropod saliva in blood feeding: sialome and post-sialome perspectives. Annu Rev Entomol. 2003;48:73–88.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Calvo E, Dao A, Pham VM, Ribeiro JM. An insight into the sialome of Anopheles funestus reveals an emerging pattern in anopheline salivary protein families. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 2007;37:164–75.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Das S, Radtke A, Choi YJ, Mendes AM, Valenzuela JG, Dimopoulos G. Transcriptomic and functional analysis of the Anopheles gambiae salivary gland in relation to blood feeding. BMC Genomics. 2010;11:566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Elanga-Ndille E, Nouage L, Binyang A, Assatse T, Tene-Fossog B, Tchouakui M, et al. Overexpression of two members of D7 salivary genes family is associated with pyrethroid resistance in the malaria vector Anopheles funestus s.s. but not in Anopheles gambiae in Cameroon. Genes (Basel). 2019;10:211.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Vijay S, Rawal R, Kadian K, Raghavendra K, Sharma A. Annotated differentially expressed salivary proteins of susceptible and insecticide-resistant mosquitoes of Anopheles stephensi. PLoS ONE. 2015;10: e0119666.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Ghosh AK, Devenport M, Jethwaney D, Kalume DE, Pandey A, Anderson VE, et al. Malaria parasite invasion of the mosquito salivary gland requires interaction between the Plasmodium TRAP and the Anopheles saglin proteins. PLoS Pathog. 2009;5: e1000265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Cornelie S, Rossignol M, Seveno M, Demettre E, Mouchet F, Djègbè I, et al. Salivary gland proteome analysis reveals modulation of anopheline unique proteins in insensitive acetylcholinesterase resistant Anopheles gambiae mosquitoes. PLoS ONE. 2014;9: e103816.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Mueller AK, Kohlhepp F, Hammerschmidt C, Michel K. Invasion of mosquito salivary glands by malaria parasites: prerequisites and defense strategies. Int J Parasitol. 2010;40:1229–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Wells MB, Andrew DJ. Anopheles salivary gland architecture shapes Plasmodium sporozoite availability for transmission. MBio. 2019;10:e01238-e1319.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. O’Brochta DA, Alford R, Harrell R, Aluvihare C, Eappen AG, Li T, et al. Is Saglin a mosquito salivary gland receptor for Plasmodium falciparum? Malar J. 2019;18:2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Calvo E, Mans BJ, Andersen JF, Ribeiro JM. Function and evolution of a mosquito salivary protein family. J Biol Chem. 2006;281:1935–42.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Francischetti IM, Valenzuela JG, Pham VM, Garfield MK, Ribeiro JM. Toward a catalog for the transcripts and proteins (sialome) from the salivary gland of the malaria vector Anopheles gambiae. J Exp Biol. 2002;205:2429–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Isaacs AT, Mawejje HD, Tomlinson S, Rigden DJ, Donnelly MJ. Genome-wide transcriptional analyses in Anopheles mosquitoes reveal an unexpected association between salivary gland gene expression and insecticide resistance. BMC Genomics. 2018;19:225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Beerntsen BT, James AA, Christensen BM. Genetics of mosquito vector competence. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2000;64:115–37.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Djegbe I, Cornelie S, Rossignol M, Demettre E, Seveno M, Remoue F, Corbel V. Differential expression of salivary proteins between susceptible and insecticide-resistant mosquitoes of Culex quinquefasciatus. PLoS ONE. 2011;6: e17496.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Mano C, Jariyapan N, Sor-Suwan S, Roytrakul S, Kittisenachai S, Tippawangkosol P, et al. Protein expression in female salivary glands of pyrethroid-susceptible and resistant strains of Aedes aegypti mosquitoes. Parasit Vectors. 2019;12:111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Rosinski-Chupin I, Briolay J, Brouilly P, Perrot S, Gomez SM, Chertemps T, et al. SAGE analysis of mosquito salivary gland transcriptomes during Plasmodium invasion. Cell Microbiol. 2007;9:708–24.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Sor-suwan S, Jariyapan N, Roytrakul S, Paemanee A, Phumee A, Phattanawiboon B, et al. Identification of salivary gland proteins depleted after blood feeding in the malaria vector Anopheles campestris-like mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae). PLoS ONE. 2014;9: e90809.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Cázares-Raga FE, Chávez-Munguía B, González-Calixto C, Ochoa-Franco AP, Gawinowicz MA, Rodríguez MH, Hernández-Hernández FC. Morphological and proteomic characterization of midgut of the malaria vector Anopheles albimanus at early time after a blood feeding. J Proteomics. 2014;111:100–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Villalon JM, Ghosh A, Jacobs-Lorena M. The peritrophic matrix limits the rate of digestion in adult Anopheles stephensi and Aedes aegypti mosquitoes. J Insect Physiol. 2003;49:891–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Billingsley PF. Blood digestion in the mosquito, Anopheles stephensi Liston (Diptera: Culicidae): partial characterization and post-feeding activity of midgut aminopeptidases. Arch Insect Biochem Physiol. 1990;15:149–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Dana AN, Hong YS, Kern MK, Hillenmeyer ME, Harker BW, Lobo NF, et al. Gene expression patterns associated with blood-feeding in the malaria mosquito Anopheles gambiae. BMC Genomics. 2005;6:5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Billingsley PF, Hecker H. Blood digestion in the mosquito, Anopheles stephensi Liston (Diptera: Culicidae): activity and distribution of trypsin, aminopeptidase, and alpha-glucosidase in the midgut. J Med Entomol. 1991;28:865–71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Ribeiro JM. A catalogue of Anopheles gambiae transcripts significantly more or less expressed following a blood meal. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 2003;33:865–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Vijay S, Rawal R, Kadian K, Singh J, Adak T, Sharma A. Proteome-wide analysis of Anopheles culicifacies mosquito midgut: new insights into the mechanism of refractoriness. BMC Genomics. 2018;19:337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Mitri C, Markianos K, Guelbeogo WM, Bischoff E, Gneme A, Eiglmeier K, et al. The kdr-bearing haplotype and susceptibility to Plasmodium falciparum in Anopheles gambiae: genetic correlation and functional testing. Malar J. 2015;14:391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Vontas J, Blass C, Koutsos AC, David JP, Kafatos FC, Louis C, et al. Gene expression in insecticide resistant and susceptible Anopheles gambiae strains constitutively or after insecticide exposure. Insect Mol Biol. 2005;14:509–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Ingham VA, Brown F, Ranson H. Transcriptomic analysis reveals pronounced changes in gene expression due to sub-lethal pyrethroid exposure and ageing in insecticide resistance Anopheles coluzzii. BMC Genomics. 2021;22:337.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Hamer GL, Kitron UD, Brawn JD, Loss SR, Ruiz MO, Goldberg TL, et al. Culex pipiens (Diptera: Culicidae): a bridge vector of West Nile virus to humans. J Med Entomol. 2008;45:125–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Morchón R, Bargues MD, Latorre JM, Melero-Alcíbar R, Pou-Barreto C, Mas-Coma S, et al. Haplotype H1 of Culex pipiens implicated as natural vector of Dirofilaria immitis in an endemic area of Western Spain. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2007;7:653–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Kimura M, Darbro JM, Harrington LC. Avian malaria parasites share congeneric mosquito vectors. J Parasitol. 2010;96:144–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Vézilier J, Nicot A, Lorgeril J, Gandon S, Rivero A. The impact of insecticide resistance on Culex pipiens immunity. Evol Appl. 2013;6:497–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Molina-Cruz A, DeJong RJ, Charles B, Gupta L, Kumar S, Jaramillo-Gutierrez G, et al. Reactive oxygen species modulate Anopheles gambiae immunity against bacteria and Plasmodium. J Biol Chem. 2008;283:3217–23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Kumar S, Christophides GK, Cantera R, Charles B, Han YS, Meister S, et al. The role of reactive oxygen species on Plasmodium melanotic encapsulation in Anopheles gambiae. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003;100:14139–44.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. James RR, Xu J. Mechanisms by which pesticides affect insect immunity. J Invertebr Pathol. 2012;109:175–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. Hillyer JF, Strand MR. Mosquito hemocyte-mediated immune responses. Curr Opin Insect Sci. 2014;3:14–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Lavine MD, Strand MR. Insect hemocytes and their role in immunity. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 2002;32:1295–309.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. Cornet S, Gandon S, Rivero A. Patterns of phenoloxidase activity in insecticide resistant and susceptible mosquitoes differ between laboratory-selected and wild-caught individuals. Parasit Vectors. 2013;6:315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Wang Y, Gilbreath TM 3rd, Kukutla P, Yan G, Xu J. Dynamic gut microbiome across life history of the malaria mosquito Anopheles gambiae in Kenya. PLoS ONE. 2011;6: e24767.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  76. Gimonneau G, Tchioffo MT, Abate L, Boissière A, Awono-Ambéné PH, Nsango SE, et al. Composition of Anopheles coluzzii and Anopheles gambiae microbiota from larval to adult stages. Infect Genet Evol. 2014;28:715–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Akorli J, Gendrin M, Pels NA, Yeboah-Manu D, Christophides GK, Wilson MD. Seasonality and locality affect the diversity of Anopheles gambiae and Anopheles coluzzii midgut microbiota from Ghana. PLoS ONE. 2016;11: e0157529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Krajacich BJ, Huestis DL, Dao A, Yaro AS, Diallo M, Krishna A, Xu J, Lehmann T. Investigation of the seasonal microbiome of Anopheles coluzzii mosquitoes in Mali. PLoS ONE. 2018;13: e0194899.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Sandeu MM, Maffo CGT, Dada N, Njiokou F, Hughes GL, Wondji CS. Seasonal variation of microbiota composition in Anopheles gambiae and Anopheles coluzzii in two different eco-geographical localities in Cameroon. Med Vet Entomol. 2022;36:269–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  80. Rosenberg R. Malaria: some considerations regarding parasite productivity. Trends Parasitol. 2008;24:487–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Cansado-Utrilla C, Zhao SY, McCall PJ, Coon KL, Hughes GL. The microbiome and mosquito vectorial capacity: rich potential for discovery and translation. Microbiome. 2021;9:111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. Rodgers FH, Gendrin M, Wyer CAS, Christophides GK. Microbiota-induced peritrophic matrix regulates midgut homeostasis and prevents systemic infection of malaria vector mosquitoes. PLoS Pathog. 2017;13: e1006391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Song X, Wang M, Dong L, Zhu H, Wang J. PGRP-LD mediates A. stephensi vector competency by regulating homeostasis of microbiota-induced peritrophic matrix synthesis. PLoS Pathog. 2018;14:e1006899.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Romoli O, Gendrin M. The tripartite interactions between the mosquito, its microbiota and Plasmodium. Parasit Vectors. 2018;11:200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Barletta ABF, Trisnadi N, Ramirez JL, Barillas-Mury C. Mosquito midgut prostaglandin release establishes systemic immune priming. iScience. 2019;19:54–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  86. Barnard K, Jeanrenaud A, Brooke BD, Oliver SV. The contribution of gut bacteria to insecticide resistance and the life histories of the major malaria vector Anopheles arabiensis (Diptera: Culicidae). Sci Rep. 2019;9:9117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  87. Martinson VG, Strand MR. Diet-microbiota interactions alter mosquito development. Front Microbiol. 2021;12: 650743.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  88. Dada N, Sheth M, Liebman K, Pinto J, Lenhart A. Whole metagenome sequencing reveals links between mosquito microbiota and insecticide resistance in malaria vectors. Sci Rep. 2018;8:2084.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. Omoke D, Kipsum M, Otieno S, Esalimba E, Sheth M, Lenhart A, et al. Western Kenyan Anopheles gambiae showing intense permethrin resistance harbour distinct microbiota. Malar J. 2021;20:77.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  90. Soltani A, Vatandoost H, Oshaghi MA, Enayati AA, Chavshin AR. The role of midgut symbiotic bacteria in resistance of Anopheles stephensi (Diptera: Culicidae) to organophosphate insecticides. Pathog Glob Health. 2017;111:289–96.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  91. Dieme C, Rotureau B, Mitri C. Microbial pre-exposure and vectorial competence of Anopheles mosquitoes. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2017;7:508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  92. Gabrieli P, Caccia S, Varotto-Boccazzi I, Arnoldi I, Barbieri G, Comandatore F, et al. Mosquito trilogy: microbiota, immunity and pathogens, and their implications for the control of disease transmission. Front Microbiol. 2021;12: 630438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  93. Bassene H, Niang EHA, Fenollar F, Dipankar B, Doucouré S, Ali E, et al. 6S Metagenomic comparison of Plasmodium falciparum-infected and noninfected Anopheles gambiae and Anopheles funestus microbiota from Senegal. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2018;99:1489–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  94. Garrett-Jones C, Shidrawi GR. Malaria vectorial capacity of a population of Anopheles gambiae: an exercise in epidemiological entomology. Bull World Health Organ. 1969;40:531–45.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  95. Ferguson HM, Maire N, Takken W, Lyimo IN, Briët O, Lindsay SW, Smith TA. Selection of mosquito life-histories: a hidden weapon against malaria? Malar J. 2012;11:106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  96. Nkahe DL, Kopya E, Djiappi-Tchamen B, Toussile W, Sonhafouo-Chiana N, Kekeunou S, et al. Fitness cost of insecticide resistance on the life-traits of a Anopheles coluzzii population from the city of Yaoundé, Cameroon. Wellcome Open Res. 2020;5:171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  97. Msangi G, Olotu MI, Mahande AM, Philbert A, Kweka EJ. The impact of insecticide pre-exposure on longevity, feeding succession, and egg batch size of wild Anopheles gambiae s.l. J Trop Med. 2020;2020:8017187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  98. Hughes A, Lissenden N, Viana M, Toé KH, Ranson H. Anopheles gambiae populations from Burkina Faso show minimal delayed mortality after exposure to insecticide-treated nets. Parasit Vectors. 2020;13:17.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  99. Viana M, Hughes A, Matthiopoulos J, Ranson H, Ferguson HM. Delayed mortality effects cut the malaria transmission potential of insecticide-resistant mosquitoes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2016;113:8975–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  100. Otali D, Novak RJ, Wan W, Bu S, Moellering DR, De Luca M. Increased production of mitochondrial reactive oxygen species and reduced adult life span in an insecticide-resistant strain of Anopheles gambiae. Bull Entomol Res. 2014;104:323–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  101. Oliver SV, Brooke BD. The effect of elevated temperatures on the life history and insecticide resistance phenotype of the major malaria vector Anopheles arabiensis (Diptera: Culicidae). Malar J. 2017;16:73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  102. Oliver SV, Brooke BD. The effect of multiple blood-feeding on the longevity and insecticide resistant phenotype in the major malaria vector Anopheles arabiensis (Diptera: Culicidae). Parasit Vectors. 2014;7:390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  103. Oliver SV, Brooke BD. The role of oxidative stress in the longevity and insecticide resistance phenotype of the major malaria vectors Anopheles arabiensis and Anopheles funestus. PLoS ONE. 2016;11: e0151049.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  104. Tchakounte A, Tchouakui M, Mu-Chun C, Tchapga W, Kopia E, Soh PT, et al. Exposure to the insecticide-treated bednet PermaNet 2.0 reduces the longevity of the wild African malaria vector Anopheles funestus but GSTe2-resistant mosquitoes live longer. PLoS ONE. 2019;14:e0213949.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  105. Tchouakui M, Riveron JM, Djonabaye D, Tchapga W, Irving H, Soh Takam P, et al. Fitness Costs of the glutathione S-transferase epsilon 2 (L119F-GSTe2) mediated metabolic resistance to insecticides in the major African malaria vector Anopheles funestus. Genes (Basel). 2018;9:645.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  106. Okoye PN, Brooke BD, Hunt RH, Coetzee M. Relative developmental and reproductive fitness associated with pyrethroid resistance in the major southern African malaria vector, Anopheles funestus. Bull Entomol Res. 2007;97:599–605.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  107. Tchouakui M, Riveron Miranda J, Mugenzi LMJ, Djonabaye D, Wondji MJ, Tchoupo M, et al. Cytochrome P450 metabolic resistance (CYP6P9a) to pyrethroids imposes a fitness cost in the major African malaria vector Anopheles funestus. Heredity (Edinb). 2020;124:621–32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  108. Tchouakui M, Mugenzi LMJ, Wondji MJ, Tchoupo M, Njiokou F, Wondji CS. Combined over-expression of two cytochrome P450 genes exacerbates the fitness cost of pyrethroid resistance in the major African malaria vector Anopheles funestus. Pestic Biochem Physiol. 2021;173: 104772.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  109. Remick D. Measuring the costs of reproduction. Trends Ecol Evol. 1992;7:42–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  110. Kirkwood TB, Rose MR. Evolution of senescence: late survival sacrificed for reproduction. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1991;332:15–24.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  111. Garland T Jr. Trade-offs. Curr Biol. 2014;24:R60–1.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  112. Rada B, Leto TL. Oxidative innate immune defenses by Nox/Duox family NADPH oxidases. Contrib Microbiol. 2008;15:164–87.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  113. Sumimoto H. Structure, regulation and evolution of Nox-family NADPH oxidases that produce reactive oxygen species. FEBS J. 2008;275:3249–77.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  114. Monaghan P, Metcalfe NB, Torres R. Oxidative stress as a mediator of life history trade-offs: mechanisms, measurements and interpretation. Ecol Lett. 2009;12:75–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors acknowledge the financial support from the Wellcome Trust, UK, through the International Intermediate Fellowship (220720/Z/20/Z) granted to Cyrille NDO.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Parasitology and Microbiology, Centre for Research in Infectious Diseases, P.O. Box 13591, Yaoundé, Cameroon

    Pierre Fongho Suh, Darus Tagne, Charles Wondji & Cyrille Ndo

  2. Faculty of Sciences, University of Yaoundé I, P.O. Box 837, Yaoundé, Cameroon

    Pierre Fongho Suh

  3. Department of Medical Entomology, Centre for Research in Infectious Diseases, P.O. Box 13591, Yaoundé, Cameroon

    Emmanuel Elanga-Ndille, Magellan Tchouakui & Maurice Marcel Sandeu

  4. Department of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, School of Veterinary Medicine and Sciences, University of Ngaoundéré, P.O. Box 454, Ngaoundéré, Cameroon

    Maurice Marcel Sandeu

  5. Faculty of Sciences, University of Douala, P.O. Box 24157, Douala, Cameroon

    Darus Tagne

  6. Vector Biology Department, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Pembroke Place, Liverpool, L3 5QA, UK

    Charles Wondji

  7. Department of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Douala, P.O. Box 24157, Douala, Cameroon

    Cyrille Ndo

Authors
  1. Pierre Fongho Suh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Emmanuel Elanga-Ndille
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Magellan Tchouakui
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Maurice Marcel Sandeu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Darus Tagne
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Charles Wondji
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Cyrille Ndo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

PFS, EEN, MT, MMS, CN wrote the manuscript. TD and PFS prepared the figures and tables. CN and CW acquiered the funding. All the authors revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cyrille Ndo.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Suh, P.F., Elanga-Ndille, E., Tchouakui, M. et al. Impact of insecticide resistance on malaria vector competence: a literature review. Malar J 22, 19 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-023-04444-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-023-04444-2

Keywords

  • Plasmodium
  • Anopheles
  • Insecticide resistance
  • Vector competence

Malaria Journal

ISSN: 1475-2875

Contact us