Acute respiratory distress syndrome and acute renal failure from Plasmodium ovale infection with fatal outcome

Case presentation

Two Malaysian acquaintances (patients A and B) went to Victoria Island, Nigeria together for a two-week working trip. Lariam® (mefloquine) was used as anti-malarial prophylaxis for the trip. They fell sick after returning to Malaysia and were admitted to different hospitals. Their cases are presented as follows:

Case A (Isolate MAL-2)

Patient A was treated immediately for cholecystitis with intravenous (IV) ceftriaxone 2 g daily and IV metronidazole 500 mg thrice daily by the attending gastroenterologist. However, his fever and thrombocytopaenia persisted, and WBC count dropped progressively. On day 5 of admission, blood smears were prepared and examined under the microscope. “Plasmodium vivax-like” parasites were found with parasitaemia of 0.10%. Further microscopic examination by a referral diagnostic centre subsequently indicated that this was a mono-infection of P. ovale. This was confirmed with nested PCR technique using primers developed from the 18S ribosomal RNA (18S rRNA) gene as applied by previous reports[19–21], coupled with sequencing analysis using Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST)[22]. Meanwhile, bacteriological culture diagnoses from patient’s blood samples were negative.

He was treated with a course of six doses of Riamet® (artemether and lumefantrine), four tablets per dose, and primaquine for two weeks. Patient A responded well to the anti-malarial treatment clinically and biochemically. Patient’s parasitaemia dropped to 0.06% the following day. Malaria parasites were cleared in less than 48 hours after initiation of Riamet® treatment. He was discharged well on day 8 of hospitalization. He remained well without relapse of malaria throughout his medical follow-up of 12 months with the hospital.

Case B (Isolate MAL-1)

Anti-malaria therapy course of chloroquine (chloroquine phosphate 150 mg base) and primaquine (30 mg) was started on patient B. However, he was still febrile (38.4°C) 24 hours later. On day 3 of the admission, patient B developed loose stools and lung examination revealed fine basal crepitations. Blood smear examination showed that the malaria parasites were not cleared. In the morning of day 4, he complained of feeling breathless and lethargic. His body temperature surged to 39.2°C. With presence of basal crepitations, an initial diagnosis of pneumonia was made and IV ceftriaxone was added into the course of treatment.

However, later that day in the afternoon, the patient developed worsening dyspnea, haemoptysis, and subsequently epistaxis. Chest X-ray examination showed bilateral haziness up to the upper zone, which was suggestive of pulmonary haemorrhage. Haematological investigation showed that his platelet count was 120,000/μl and the malaria parasite load was reduced to 0.03%. Despite the lowering of parasitaemia, patient B progressed into respiratory failure. He was intubated and ventilated. His anti-malarial treatment was changed to IV quinine 850 mg (1 dose) and subsequently to IV artesunate 160 mg (for 7 days). Furosemide was given to the patient for presumed pulmonary oedema.

On day 5 of the admission, malaria parasites were completely cleared. However, patient was still febrile with temperature of 40.8°C. He was transferred to intensive care unit. On day 6, patient B was oliguric. Increased level of creatinine and worsening of respiratory acidosis were noted. The patient had developed acute kidney injury (AKI) secondary to overwhelming sepsis. Hypotensive episodes were encountered. Therefore inotropic support was initiated. His antibiotic regime was changed to IV Tacocin® (tazobactam and piperacilin).

On day 12, patient B was still febrile with little improvement on his lung function. He was still dependent on the ventilator. IV Tacocin® was replaced by IV vancomycin and imipenem empirical treatment. All the five sets of bacteriological blood cultures and one set of fungal culture requested earlier on different days came back as negative. Nevertheless, dialysis was started on day 15 due to oliguric AKI with worsening acidosis (mixed respiratory and metabolic). Dialysis was performed on daily basis till the end of his life.

On day 17, bacteriological culture from patient’s blood sample that was collected on day 15 was positive for Enterobacter cloacae, which was sensitive to carbapenems. Hence, the imipenem therapy was continued. However, due to epileptic seizures suffered by the patient on day 17, the antibiotic regime was subsequently replaced with meropenem. A computerized tomography (CT) scanning on the patient’s brain showed no abnormality. Another thorax CT scanning showed extensive bilateral lung consolidation and loculated pleural effusion. His fever persisted, and he was on prolonged ventilation with difficulty in weaning off. His condition continued to deteriorate. He went into recalcitrant atrial fibrillation on day 22 and required tripleinotropic support. Further blood bacteriological and fungal cultures were all negative. On the 23^rd day of hospital admission, he went into asystole and succumbed to P. ovale infection with ARDS, acute renal failure, metabolic acidosis, and nosocomial sepsis.

Post-clinical analysis and interpretation

Plasmodium ovale is not found locally in Malaysia. Alignment of short segments from 18S rRNA gene sequences of these two cases, i.e. isolate MAL-1 (GenBank accession number KF192072) and isolate MAL-2 (GenBank accession number KF192073) with 18S rRNA gene sequences of other isolates of P. ovale spp. that were available in GenBank (accession number L48986, JF894403, JF894405, GQ183051, JF894407, JF894410, M19172) were conducted. The multiple sequence alignment showed that the aetiological agents of the two cases in this case report were P. ovale curtisi (Figure 1). The clustering of these two isolates with P. ovale curtisi can be visualized clearly via a simple phylogenetic tree constructed using neighbour-joining method (bootstrap = 1000) as described previously[23] (Figure 2).

A case of ovale malaria imported from Nigeria was previously reported in Malaysia[24], and these are another two imported cases of P. ovale infection. Unlike the previous case report, which involved a Nigerian student (imported patient) who showed no complications[24], both cases reported here involved Malaysians that acquired malaria from a trip to Nigeria (imported infection), and one showed severe complications that were ultimately fatal. Interestingly, both patients had taken anti-malarial prophylaxis during their trip to Nigeria. Nevertheless, they still contracted malaria. This may be due to usage of the prophylactic drugs without properly following the instructions or low compliance during the trip. Another reason for failed protective effect of anti-malaria chemoprophylaxis against P. ovale infection is the ability of P. ovale to form hypnozoites, which can survive chemoprophylaxis[18].

In case A, there was a delay in malaria diagnosis. This case is a good example of clinical setting where malaria tends to be overlooked at the initial stage of medical investigation due to low level of suspicion. From the initial haematological investigation, all but one (platelet count) showed values within the normal range. In many hospital settings, especially those of urban areas and non-malaria endemic regions, such investigation outcome usually carries a thin possibility of instigating a blood film microscopic examination. Indeed, a case of traveller’s malaria that developed into severe complications due to delayed diagnosis was reported in Croatia recently[25]. The available reported malaria with delayed diagnoses may just be a tip of the iceberg; and such incident may happen more frequently than expected. Thus malaria should have been suspected if patient presented with fever, thrombocytopaenia, and showed history of travelling to malaria-endemic areas within the past one year. The long period between travel to malaria endemic country and disease onset may also contribute to delay in diagnosis, and subsequently the appropriate treatment. The late onset of symptoms due to long latency period provides challenges to clinical diagnoses upon admission. As mentioned previously, P. ovale spp. can form hypnozoites and result in long latency[18, 26], which can be seen in the two cases presented here.

Patient B succumbed to the malaria infection and he did not have any medical problems prior to the illness. Patient A, who is a heavy drinker, was known to have hypertension even before the infection, survived. One possible explanation for this is the partial immunity gained by patient A from previous incidents of malaria. People who have past history of acquiring falciparum malaria and those staying in malaria-endemic regions are known to show less severe symptoms during subsequent malaria infections compared to people who are from non-malaria endemic regions (malaria-naïve)[27]. Indeed, such protective effect of acquired partial immunity via previous exposure to malaria was noted and mentioned in previous reports on falciparum and vivax malaria-related ARDS[5, 28, 29]. Furthermore, malaria related pulmonary complications are often seen in non-immune patients[30]. Patient A might be partially protected against severe complications due to previous exposure to malaria. Patient B did not have prior exposure to malaria, and therefore, he suffered and succumbed to the severe complications in his first attack of malaria infection. Even so, pathogenesis of ovale malaria is not intensively studied and protection against ovale malaria complications conferred by previous exposure has not been investigated. Therefore, more investigations are needed to validate this postulation.

One important note worth mentioning here is the trend of ARDS onset and development in this case. Similar to the situation of malaria-induced ARDS reported previously[10, 31, 32], patient B showed normal breathing without wheezing and crepitations upon admission, but his respiratory function deteriorated towards the grave complication of ARDS afterwards. Therefore, physicians should pay close attention to the respiratory condition of every admitted malaria case. Moreover, malaria is regarded as one of the important causes of ARDS[1].

In case B, nosocomial Enterobacter cloacae infection was diagnosed during the course of his hospital stay. Here, bacterial infection was ruled out as the primary cause of ARDS in patient B as the bacteriological culture showed positive results as late as day 15, whereas he showed symptoms of acute lung injury as early as day 4. Undoubtedly, the bacterial infection that occurred at such critical timing would worsen the health condition of the patient, which acted as the secondary contributing factor towards the fatal end for this case. Another point worth mentioning was the onset of the ARDS symptoms after the initiation of anti-malarial therapy, which was similar to many cases of malaria-associated ARDS reported previously[9, 10, 30–34]. The pulmonary injury seen in this case was likely to be a post-treatment related pulmonary inflammation. Nonetheless, a few case reports of malaria-induced ARDS with pre-treatment onset were described previously[5, 35]. In addition, quinine was known to be capable of inducing pulmonary injury[34]. Hence, the quinine therapy that was briefly applied on the patient may contribute to the worsening of his lung injury. Nevertheless, quinine therapy was immediately replaced with artesunate within the same day.

Thrombocytopaenia was seen in both cases. Such phenomenon has been observed in patients infected with P. falciparum, P. vivax, and P. knowlesi[8, 21, 36–39]. Thrombocytopaenia may serve as a contributing factor, instead of a primary cause of malaria-related severe pulmonary injury. Indeed, the platelet reading of patient A (survived case) was lower than that of patient B (fatal case) upon admission. Other events that are believed to contribute towards acute pulmonary injuries include: host immunologic responses[34], rosetting phenomenon, which is found in all four species of human malaria parasites[40–44], and sequestration that is found in P. falciparum and to a lesser, but significant extent, P. vivax[45]. This event may account for the much higher prevalence of ARDS complications seen in falciparum malaria. Nonetheless, the pathophysiology of malaria-associated ARDS is not completely understood[1, 10, 30].

Another aspect of this fatal case of P. ovale infection that deserves attention is the acute renal failure. Acute renal failure is another potentially fatal complication in malaria[25, 46, 47]. However, such complication is reported mostly in falciparum malaria[47–49], the newly emerging knowlesi malaria[21, 50], and occasionally, in a few cases of P. vivax and P. malariae infections[51, 52]. A fatal case of vivax malaria with acute renal failure was reported recently[53]. This is by far the first reported case of P. ovale infection with acute renal injury. In case B, the patient suffered renal injury a few days before he came down with nosocomial sepsis. Therefore, the acute renal injury seen in this case was less likely to be caused by nosocomial sepsis. Nevertheless, the nosocomial sepsis might act as the secondary contributing factor towards the renal failure in this patient. Besides, the medications used on the patient such as vancomycin is potentially nephrotoxic[54], thus serving as another potential contributing factor that worsened the acute renal injury. Hence, such therapy was discontinued.

Apart from the differences in pathological development of both cases, the anti-malaria treatment regimes used in both cases were dissimilar as well. For patient A, Riamet® with primaquine was used whereas for patient B, chloroquine and primaquine were prescribed at the initial stage of treatment. Parasites were not detected from patient A’s blood smear in less than 48 hours after initiation of antimalarial treatment. On the other hand, complete parasite clearance could only be declared on patient B after switching the medication to quinine and artesunate. Consequently, the parasite clearance took as long as five days to accomplish. Parasite clearance was much faster in treatment strategy using the artemether-lumefantrine-primaquine combination than that of chloroquine-primaquine combination. Indeed, artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT) has been proven to show high efficacy in treating falciparum malaria[55] and non-falciparum malaria[56]. The much slower parasite clearance by chloroquine-based treatment may be due to the stage-specific anti-malarial property of chloroquine. As shown by previous studies, the trophozoites of P. vivax, P. malariae and P. ovale are relatively insusceptible to chloroquine[57–59]. Therefore, ACT such as Riamet® can serve as an effective first line treatment even for non-falciparum malaria.

Severe ovale malaria is not commonly found. There are a few reports of P. ovale infection with ARDS[9–12], and one case of ovale malaria with splenic complication[60]. Fatal ovale malaria is even rarer. A fatal case of ovale malaria involving a young Moroccan soldier was reported recently[12]. Interestingly, this ovale malaria casualty also suffered ARDS complication. This recent case report and our report show that P. ovale is capable of causing severe complications and death. For that reason, patients with P. ovale infection should not be regarded as “ultimately benign” and taken lightly, particularly in the non-immune travellers. In view of this, travel history as well as past history of acquiring malaria in patients with fever must be recorded in detail to assist in the diagnosis and management of travellers’ malaria and severe malaria.