Open Access

Susceptibility of human Plasmodium knowlesi infections to anti-malarials

  • Farrah A Fatih1,
  • Henry M Staines1,
  • Angela Siner2,
  • Mohammed Atique Ahmed2,
  • Lu Chan Woon3,
  • Erica M Pasini4,
  • Clemens HM Kocken4,
  • Balbir Singh2,
  • Janet Cox-Singh2, 5 and
  • Sanjeev Krishna1, 2Email author
Malaria Journal201312:425

https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-12-425

Received: 18 September 2013

Accepted: 12 November 2013

Published: 19 November 2013

Abstract

Background

Evidence suggests that Plasmodium knowlesi malaria in Sarawak, Malaysian Borneo remains zoonotic, meaning anti-malarial drug resistance is unlikely to have developed in the absence of drug selection pressure. Therefore, adequate response to available anti-malarial treatments is assumed.

Methods

Here the ex vivo sensitivity of human P. knowlesi isolates in Malaysian Borneo were studied, using a WHO schizont maturation assay modified to accommodate the quotidian life cycle of this parasite. The in vitro sensitivities of P. knowlesi H strain adapted from a primate infection to in vitro culture (by measuring the production of Plasmodium lactate dehydrogenase) were also examined together with some assays using Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax.

Results

Plasmodium knowlesi is uniformly highly sensitive to artemisinins, variably and moderately sensitive to chloroquine, and less sensitive to mefloquine.

Conclusions

Taken together with reports of clinical failures when P. knowlesi is treated with mefloquine, the data suggest that caution is required if using mefloquine in prevention or treatment of P. knowlesi infections, until further studies are undertaken.

Keywords

ArtemisininArtemetherArtesunateDihydroartemisininDHAChloroquineMefloquineMalaria

Background

From its natural simian hosts in Southeast Asia, Plasmodium knowlesi has emerged as a significant human pathogen, particularly in Malaysian Borneo [13]. Human P. knowlesi infections cause febrile illnesses that can rapidly progress to severe and sometimes fatal outcomes [4]. Ominously, the incidence of P. knowlesi malaria is increasing in geographic areas where Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax are coming under control, thereby threatening the aim of eliminating malaria [5]. Determining the efficacy of conventional anti-malarials against P. knowlesi is a priority, particularly as there are no reports of anti-malarials assessed against human isolates of P. knowlesi ex vivo.

Here, the drug sensitivity profiles of P. knowlesi isolates obtained from patients being recruited into a study of the pathophysiology of knowlesi malaria in an endemic area of Sarawak, Malaysian Borneo were investigated. Currently, the WHO recommends artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT) as first-line treatment for malaria in most endemic areas, so artemisinin and its clinically useful derivatives artesunate, dihydroartemisinin (DHA) and artemether were tested. Mefloquine, used as a partner drug in certain artemisinin-based combinations and in prophylaxis against malaria, and chloroquine that is recommended for treatment of Plasmodium malariae (the species which P. knowlesi is often confused with when diagnosed by microscopy) were also included. In addition, results from P. falciparum and P. vivax studied contemporaneously are presented, together with those obtained with the H strain laboratory isolate of P. knowlesi (cultured in vitro in rhesus erythrocytes) to confirm the methodologies used. Insights into the drug susceptibility patterns of this important emerging parasite, may prove useful in guiding the best choice of anti-malarial treatment regimens for P. knowlesi infection.

Methods

Patient recruitment

Plasmodium isolates were obtained from patients presenting to hospitals in Sarikei and Sibu. Informed written consent was obtained from all patients entered into this study, which was approved by the Malaysian Ministry of Health’s Medical Research and Ethics Committee, and the Sarawak State Planning Unit. Infecting species was confirmed by Plasmodium species-specific nested-PCR assays [6] and only patients with single species infections were retained in the study.

Blood collection and ex vivo parasite development in growth assays

Pre-treatment venous blood from each patient was collected into EDTA. Parasitaemia and the asexual stage of development were determined by Giemsa-stained thin film microscopy. Whole blood (~2.5 ml) was washed twice without centrifugation to avoid haemolysis, before resuspending in RPMI 1640 complete medium supplemented with 20 mM D-glucose, 40 mM HEPES, 25 mg/l gentamicin sulphate, and 15% v/v human AB plasma with 0.2 mM hypoxanthine.

Growth inhibition by anti-malarials was assessed by quantifying schizont maturation using an adapted WHO Mark III assay [7]. Species of Plasmodium tested and the time lag in maturation seen previously ex vivo were allowed for in these assays [8]. While more complex counting procedures have been used to study P. vivax parasites that, like P. knowlesi, have mature parasites present in circulating blood [9], only the timing of assays was altered. This is because the P. knowlesi isolates contained predominantly immature parasites (Table 1) and results from a parallel study on tightly synchronised immature laboratory P. knowlesi H strain parasites with artesunate using the p LDH (see below) and Mark III assays were comparable with each other and with the data derived from isolates (see Results).
Table 1

Patient isolate data

Isolate

Species

% starting parasitaemia

% schizont at start of assay

Duration of in vitro development (h)

% schizont at end of assay

P0002

Pk

0.4

15

12

80

P0003

Pk

0.6

10

12

86

P0006

Pk

0.8

33

17

53

P0009

Pk

7.0a

17

15

94

P0010

Pk

0.8

6

12

63

P0011

Pk

1.3

8

14

54

P0007

Pf

2.0a

0

31

50

P0001

Pv

0.5

20

18

58

P0013

Pv

0.5

30

29

60

aAbove Mark III assay cut-off (for examination of P. falciparum mono-infections), assuming a parasitaemia of 1.6% equates to approximately 80,000 parasites per μl of blood, and was used undiluted. Note that in both cases good schizont development was observed.

For each isolate, the species, parasitaemia and change in development over time are presented.

Aliquots (100 μl) of no drug control and serial dilutions of the anti-malarial compounds in culture medium (final concentrations of 0.25 to 25 nM for artemisinin and derivatives and 1.25 nM to 1 μM for chloroquine and mefloquine) were dispensed into 96-well plates, and parasites were added (100 μl at 2% haematocrit). Incubation was in 5% O2, 5% CO2, 90% N2 at 37°C until the majority of parasites reached the schizont stage (with at least 3 nuclei after 12–17 h for P. knowlesi). Monitoring of maturation was undertaken every 2 h by examination of fixed, Giemsa stained thin blood films, taken from a parallel culture to those of the drug exposed cultures. When at least half of the parasites in the monitoring culture had reached the schizont stage of development, the drug exposed cultures and their controls were harvested, as thick films on glass slides, and examined. The duration of in vitro development for each isolate (as determined above), which also equates to the time of drug exposure, is given in Table 1. Thick films were fixed by air drying for at least 24 h, stained with Giemsa, and mounted to protect slides during transportation.

As thick films are easily damaged, five replicates were prepared for each drug concentration and 3 replicates then counted for each experimental condition. Counting was in a blinded fashion to avoid bias. Thick films were counted according to the WHO Mark III protocol. At least 200 asexual parasites were counted. Fields of view were consecutive, starting at the left edge of each blood film and moving stepwise in a uniform direction (to ensure no overlap). Asexual parasites were grouped into either trophozoites or schizonts (defined as asexual parasites displaying 1–2 nuclei and 3 or more nuclei, respectively).

Growth assay measuring Plasmodium lactate dehydrogenase (p LDH)

Rhesus monkey red blood cells for in vitro P. knowlesi culture were obtained under protocols approved by the independent institutional ethical committee (DEC) according to Dutch and European laws.

The efficacy of the anti-malarial compounds was also assessed in vitro against the laboratory maintained P. knowlesi H strain [10, 11], by measuring the production of p LDH [12]. p LDH catalyzes the conversion of 3-acetylpyridine adenine dinucleotide (APAD) and lactate to APADH and pyruvate. The enzyme diaphorase subsequently converts nitro blue tetrazolium (NBT) to nitro blue formazan (NBF), using APADH as a reducing agent. NBF can be measured at a wavelength of 655 nm. Serial dilutions of the anti-malarial compounds (100 μl in culture medium) and including a no drug control were dispensed into 96-well plates, to which tightly synchronized (by alanine lysis) early ring-stage infected erythrocytes (100 μl at 2% haematocrit and 2% parasitaemia in culture medium) were added. The plates were then placed in 3% O2, 7% CO2, 90% N2 at 37°C for 22 h to mature (just prior to parasite release). Growth was halted and drug removed, by washing twice in ice-cold PBS. Erythrocytes were lysed by freezing at −20°C and thawing. Aliquots of 0.5 mg/ml of NBT, 1 U/ml diaphorase and 50 μg/ml APAD in LDH buffer (100 mM Tris–HCl, pH 8.0, 50 mM Na L-lactate, 2.5% v/v Triton X-100) were added to the thawed cell pellets and incubated for 30 min in the dark at room temperature with shaking. The optical density (OD) at 655 nm of each well was measured in a BioRad 680 microplate reader. OD655 values were used to calculate growth by comparing the OD655 values at each drug concentration with that of the no drug control. To test the efficacy of artemisinin, artemether, artesunate and DHA, preparations of final concentrations of 0.1 nM to 25 nM were used, and for chloroquine and mefloquine, final concentrations of 1.25 nM to 1 μM were used.

IC50 values and sequence alignments

Dose–response data were modeled using a four-parameter fit and a variable slope, using Prism (Version 4.0a). Goodness of fit was assessed by R2, and either noted in the text or highlighted if < 0.8 in tables and figures. For the schizont maturation assay, the top parameter was constrained to 100% for assays using artemisinins but not for mefloquine or chloroquine. For the p LDH assay, the top and bottom parameters were constrained to 100 and 0, respectively, for all drugs and, for the 3H-hypoxanthine incorporation assay, the top parameter was constrained to 100. Data are summarized as a mean and 95% CI for replicates of single parasite assays and a mean ± SEM for results from multiple independent parasite assays.

The P. knowlesi and P. vivax orthologues of P. falciparum CRT, MDR1, and ATP6 (proteins associated with modulating sensitivities to chloroquine, mefloquine and artemisinins [13]), were aligned with P. falciparum 3D7 strain, as a drug sensitive control. H strain and Sal-1 strain sequences were used for P. knowlesi and P. vivax, respectively. Wild-type and polymorphism sequence data were taken from PlasmoDB [14]. Alignments were performed in MacVector (version 11.0.2).

Results

Patient recruitment

Patient isolate data from those obtained in Sarikei and Sibu hospitals, between March and September 2010, are shown in Table 1. A total of nine patients were recruited into this study, six with P. knowlesi, two with P. vivax and one with P. falciparum monoinfections. Infections were initially diagnosed by microscopy and confirmed later by nested PCR [2, 6].

Parasite development

In vitro development data for each isolate used during growth assays are shown in Table 1. P. knowlesi field isolates were seeded into growth assays with a starting parasitaemia ranging from 0.4 to 7%. The percentage of schizonts present at the start of the assays ranged from 6 to 33%. Good in vitro development was demonstrated for all P. knowlesi field isolates, with 53 to 94% of asexual parasites reaching the schizont stage, over a development period of 12 to 17 h. Development was similar for P. falciparum and P. vivax field isolates (Table 1).

Growth assays: schizont maturation

Dose–response curves were used to derive IC50 values, which are presented in Figure 1, together with mean values in Table 2. All the isolates from humans were sensitive to artemisinin and its derivatives, with IC50 values in the low nM range (from 0.38 to 6.8 nM). The IC50 values for chloroquine on P. knowlesi from humans were relatively high, with values ranging from 11 to 38 nM but were similar to those derived for the single P. falciparum isolate (28 (20 to 38) nM; R2 = 0.93) and the two P. vivax isolates (33 (10 to 110) and 18 (11 to 27) nM; R2 = 0.45 and 0.95, respectively) that were studied.
Figure 1

IC 50 values for anti-malarial drugs against Plasmodium isolates, using the schizont maturation assay. Data points represent mean IC50 values (nM) derived from single experiments performed in triplicate. Plasmodium knowlesi (black symbols), P. vivax (red symbols) and P. falciparum (green symbols). Filled symbols indicate R2 values ≥ 0.8, with unfilled symbols indicting R2 values < 0.8. Mefloquine, MQ; Chloroquine, CQ; Artemisinin, AR; Artemether, AM; Artesunate, AS; Dihydroartemisinin, DHA. Note that there is only mefloquine data for one of the two P. vivax isolates.

Table 2

P. knowlesi drug sensitivity data

Drug

IC50values (nM) for P. knowlesi isolates (maturation assay)a

IC50values (nM) for P. knowlesi H strain ( p LDH assay)b

Mefloquine

26 (± 3.1)

25 (7.4 to 81)c

Chloroquine

23 (± 4.8)

3.2 (2.2 to 4.7)

Artemisinin

2.1 (± 0.99)

0.80 (0.35 to 1.9)c

Artemether

0.90 (± 0.19)

0.84 (0.34 to 2.1)c

Artesunate

0.90 (± 0.12)

2.0 (0.93 to 4.2)c

DHA

1.6 (± 0.92)

0.79 (0.62 to 1.0)

aMean (± SEM), from 6 independent experiments (each of which was performed in triplicate).

bMean (95% CIs), from a single experiment repeated in quintuplicate.

cR2 < 0.8.

IC50 values are presented for six anti-malarials on P. knowlesi field isolates and laboratory H strain.

Plasmodium knowlesi isolates were least sensitive to mefloquine, with a mean IC50 value of 26 nM (Table 2). The IC50 value for mefloquine on the single P. falciparum field isolate (6.3 (2.5 to 16) nM; R2 = 0.97) was four-fold less than that of the average P. knowlesi IC50 value and 2.5-fold less than the lowest P. knowlesi IC50 value (16 (12 to 22) nM; R2 = 0.96).

Growth assays: p LDH

To validate the results of the drug assays on P. knowlesi from patients, anti-malarials were assessed against the well characterized P. knowlesi H strain grown in vitro in rhesus erythrocytes. To determine whether data generated by the p LDH method (as used to study the H strain) would be comparable with the adapted schizont maturation method (as used in the field study) a parallel study was performed, using artesunate. The IC50 value for artesunate against the H strain was 2.0 (0.93 to 4.2) nM (R2 = 0.39), using the p LDH assay (from a single experiment repeated in quintuplicate), and 1.2 (0.88 to 1.6) nM (R2 = 0.95), using the schizont maturation assay (from a single experiment repeated in triplicate), demonstrating that the two assay methods are comparable, at least in the case of artemisinins. Further IC50 values derived from p LDH assays are presented in Table 2. All IC50 values for field isolates and the P. knowlesi H strain for artemisinins are highly comparable.

For mefloquine, the IC50 value against the laboratory H strain (25 (7.4 to 81) nM; R2 = 0.40) was nearly identical to the mean IC50 value of human isolates (26 nM). The IC50 values suggest that P. knowlesi may be intrinsically insensitive to mefloquine. To ensure that the mefloquine stock used in field studies had not degraded during the study, an aliquot was tested after shipping it back to St. George’s, University of London after the study. Using hypoxanthine incorporation as a measure of growth [15] in a single assay (performed in quadruplicate) with P. falciparum (3D7) parasites cultured in vitro in human erythrocytes, the IC50 value was 9.7 (5.5 to 17) nM (R2 = 0.89), confirming that potency of mefloquine was maintained.

Interestingly, the H strain was over 7-fold more sensitive to chloroquine than the average value for field isolates, having an IC50 value of 3.2 (2.2 to 4.7) nM (R2 = 0.86). This value was also well below the lowest calculated IC50 value (11 (5.3 to 24) nM; R2 = 0.94) for a field isolate.

Sequence alignments

Point mutations associated with change in the sensitivity of P. falciparum to chloroquine, mefloquine and the artemisinins [13] were analysed, and similarities and differences in sequences encoded by P. knowlesi and P. vivax homologues are reported in Figure 2. Known loci at which mutations can reduce drug sensitivity were highly conserved between P. knowlesi H, P. vivax Sal-1 MDR1 homologues and MDR1 in drug sensitive P. falciparum 3D7. PfATP6 orthologues demonstrated polymorphism in amino acids in about two thirds of the residues previously examined for effects on drug sensitivity, including L263 [1618].
Figure 2

Alignment of CRT, ATP6, and MDR1 homologues of P. knowlesi H strain and P. vivax Sal-1 strain, against P. falciparum 3D7 and strains with known point mutations associated with drug resistance. Amino acids are colour coded, with green representing the drug sensitive P. falciparum 3D7, and red representing amino acid changes found in P. falciparum isolates that have a change in drug sensitivity.

The CRT orthologues were fairly well conserved with the exceptions of S219A, A220S, and R371M in the chloroquine sensitive strain. These differences do not confer chloroquine resistance to the P. knowlesi H strain. Agreement in sequences in these polymorphic regions was higher between P. knowlesi H and P. vivax Sal-1 than between either strain and P. falciparum 3D7 consistent with a closer phylogenetic relationship between the former species [19].

Discussion

In vitro culture of P. knowlesi has only recently been achieved in human erythrocytes [20, 21]. However, drug sensitivity assays of natural human infections can only be assessed in short term cultures. These allowed the successful application of drug sensitivity micro-assays such as the WHO Mark III micro-assay test after adaptation to the quotidian life cycle of the parasite and frequent (every 2 to 2.5 h) monitoring of development to allow assessment of when most parasites were mature schizonts in control samples.

The excellent in vitro efficacy of the artemisinins against both human P. knowlesi (mean IC50 values < 2.2 nM) and the laboratory (H) strain is consistent with recent observations made on patients treated with artesunate, where no mortality was observed after treatment [22]. These results also agree with data from animal models, which demonstrate the successful clearance of P. knowlesi parasites from infected rhesus monkeys, by artemisinin in combination therapy with naphthoquine [23]. In addition, William et al.[24] in a retrospective analysis of clinical cases of knowlesi malaria in Sabah, reported the successful treatment of patients by artemether-lumefantrine combination therapy. This study also noted that where knowlesi malaria developed signs of severity, intravenous artesunate was effective [24].

Intriguingly, chloroquine IC50 values from this field study, including those derived against P. knowlesi (with values ranging from 11 to 38 nM), were higher than that of the laboratory P. knowlesi H strain (3.2 nM), although the reason for this is unclear. In general, the values are comparable with chloroquine-sensitive laboratory strains of P. falciparum, having IC50 values ranging from 8 to 15 nM [2527]. These values all fall below the 100 nM threshold used to define chloroquine resistance [27, 28] and there is no evidence for clinical chloroquine resistance reported in P. knowlesi. Chloroquine is effective both as a monotherapy and when used in combination with primaquine [1, 24, 29]. Consistent with these findings, Tyagi et al.[30] have recently reported that CRT (and DHFR) sequences from P. knowlesi clinical isolates collected in the Andaman and Nicobar Islands, India, were all found to be wild-type (with close homology to the CRT sequence of chloroquine sensitive P. falciparum parasites – see Figure 2 and below). Nevertheless, continued monitoring of chloroquine sensitivity in P. knowlesi might be prudent bearing in mind the history of chloroquine resistance development in other malarial species.

Evidence suggests that transmission of P. knowlesi to humans in Sarawak remains zoonotic and, thus, ostensibly free from mefloquine drug selection pressure. However, results with mefloquine consistently showed a low sensitivity in P. knowlesi field isolates, when compared with that of P. falciparum. The mean IC50 value for mefloquine calculated for the 6 P. knowlesi isolates is 26 nM, which is just above the value used to define mefloquine resistance in P. falciparum (>24 nM) in some reports [31, 32] but well below that reported by others (>119 nM) [33]. Importantly, the reduced P. knowlesi response in human isolates was also observed in the P. knowlesi H experimental line. Given the efficacy of the mefloquine used was confirmed after the end of the study, these results indicate an innate tolerance of P. knowlesi to mefloquine. These findings also suggest the strong possibility of treatment failure if mefloquine is used as mono or combination therapy for P. knowlesi and is supported by reports of mefloquine treatment failure in rhesus monkeys infected with P. knowlesi[34], as well as recent cases of mefloquine treatment failure in humans with knowlesi malaria [35]. On this basis, mefloquine should be used with caution for the treatment of knowlesi malaria, or indeed for prophylaxis against malaria in areas where acquiring knowlesi is a risk until larger studies have been undertaken.

There is reasonable conservation of MDR1 sequences between P. vivax Sal-1 and P. knowlesi H and the P. falciparum 3D7 reference strain. Previous studies on P. falciparum found that increased mdr1 copy number conferred a mefloquine resistant phenotype [36] and risk of treatment failure, although P. knowlesi mdr1 copy number in the isolates reported in the current study have not been determined. Alignments of the P. vivax Sal-1 and P. knowlesi H CRT and ATP6 orthologues with the P. falciparum 3D7 sequence revealed several polymorphic differences between the P. vivax and P. knowlesi alignments and that of the P. falciparum. These substitutions do not alter sensitivity of P. knowlesi to artemisinins and give insights into the possible contributions of these residues to artemisinin sensitivity in P. falciparum.

Here, it has been established that it is possible to culture in vitro P. knowlesi in human erythrocytes in the short term, when taken ex vivo. In addition, the successful adaption of the schizont development assay to determine anti-malarial drug sensitivities of P. knowlesi field isolates has been shown. Using this adapted method, this study has demonstrated that chloroquine and artemisinin based drugs are effective against P. knowlesi parasites. Conversely this study has shown poor sensitivity of P. knowlesi field isolates and laboratory H strain to mefloquine, suggesting innate reduced sensitivity of the parasite to this important anti-malarial drug.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge the staff at Hospital Sarikei especially Mr Wong Ching Toh, Mr Pek Peng Chin, Mdm Siti Syartinah and Mdm Raymand Johan for helping with patient recruitment and Mdm Dayang Shuaisah Awang Mohamad and the staff at the Malaria Research Centre at UNIMAS. Finally, we would like to thank the patients who so kindly agreed to be a part of this study, and without whom this research would not have been possible.

Funding

FAF was funded by the MRC-Doctoral Training Grant G0800110. This study was funded by the Medical Research Council (MRC) UK; Grant number G0801971 and the European Community’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013), EVIMALAR network of Excellence under grant agreement N° 242095 and NANOMAL under grant agreement N° 304948.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Division of Clinical Sciences, Centre for Infection and Immunity, St. George’s, University of London
(2)
Malaria Research Centre, University Malaysia Sarawak
(3)
Pathology Laboratory, Hospital Sarikei
(4)
Biomedical Primate Research Centre
(5)
School of Medicine, University of St Andrews

References

  1. Singh B, Daneshvar C: Human infections and detection of Plasmodium knowlesi. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2013, 26: 165-184.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Singh B, Kim Sung L, Matusop A, Radhakrishnan A, Shamsul SS, Cox-Singh J, Thomas A, Conway DJ: A large focus of naturally acquired Plasmodium knowlesi infections in human beings. Lancet. 2004, 363: 1017-1024.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Vythilingam I, Tan CH, Asmad M, Chan ST, Lee KS, Singh B: Natural transmission of Plasmodium knowlesi to humans by Anopheles latens in Sarawak, Malaysia. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2006, 100: 1087-1088.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Cox-Singh J, Davis TM, Lee KS, Shamsul SS, Matusop A, Ratnam S, Rahman HA, Conway DJ, Singh B: Plasmodium knowlesi malaria in humans is widely distributed and potentially life threatening. Clin Infect Dis. 2008, 46: 165-171.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. William T, Rahman HA, Jelip J, Ibrahim MY, Menon J, Grigg MJ, Yeo TW, Anstey NM, Barber BE: Increasing incidence of Plasmodium knowlesi malaria following control of P. falciparum and P. vivax malaria in Sabah, Malaysia. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2013, 7: e2026-PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Lee KS, Divis PC, Zakaria SK, Matusop A, Julin RA, Conway DJ, Cox-Singh J, Singh B: Plasmodium knowlesi: reservoir hosts and tracking the emergence in humans and macaques. PLoS Pathog. 2011, 7: e1002015-PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. WHO Mark III assay.http://www.who.int/malaria/publications/atoz/markiii.pdf,
  8. Srinivas SD, Puri SK: Time course of in vitro maturation of intra-erythrocytic malaria parasite: a comparison between Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium knowlesi. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2002, 97: 901-903.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Wernsdorfer WH, Tasanor O, Wernsdorfer G: In vitro drug sensitivity testing in Plasmodium vivax. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2008, 120: 30-33.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Howard RJ, Barnwell JW, Kao V: Antigenic variation of Plasmodium knowlesi malaria: identification of the variant antigen on infected erythrocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1983, 80: 4129-4133.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Kocken CH, Ozwara H, van der Wel A, Beetsma AL, Mwenda JM, Thomas AW: Plasmodium knowlesi provides a rapid in vitro and in vivo transfection system that enables double-crossover gene knockout studies. Infect Immun. 2002, 70: 655-660.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Druilhe P, Moreno A, Blanc C, Brasseur PH, Jacquier P: A colorimetric in vitro drug sensitivity assay for Plasmodium falciparum based on a highly sensitive double-site lactate dehydrogenase antigen-capture enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2001, 64: 233-241.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Ecker A, Lehane AM, Fiddock DA: Molecular markers of Plasmodium resistance to antimalarials. Treatment and Prevention of Malaria: Antimalarial Drug Chemistry, Action and Use. Edited by: Staines HM, Krishna S. 2012, Basel: Springer Basel, 249-280.Google Scholar
  14. PlasmoDB.http://www.plasmodb.org/plasmo/,
  15. Desjardins RE, Canfield CJ, Haynes JD, Chulay JD: Quantitative assessment of antimalarial activity in vitro by a semiautomated microdilution technique. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1979, 16: 710-718.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Pulcini S, Staines HM, Pittman JK, Slavic K, Doerig C, Halbert J, Tewari R, Shah F, Avery MA, Haynes RK, Krishna S: Expression in yeast links field polymorphisms in PfATP6 to in vitro artemisinin resistance and identifies new inhibitor classes. J Infect Dis. 2013, in pressGoogle Scholar
  17. Uhlemann AC, Cameron A, Eckstein-Ludwig U, Fischbarg J, Iserovich P, Zuniga FA, East M, Lee A, Brady L, Haynes RK, Krishna S: A single amino acid residue can determine the sensitivity of SERCAs to artemisinins. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2005, 12: 628-629.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Valderramos SG, Scanfeld D, Uhlemann AC, Fidock DA, Krishna S: Investigations into the role of the Plasmodium falciparum SERCA (PfATP6) L263E mutation in artemisinin action and resistance. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2010, 54: 3842-3852.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Tachibana S, Sullivan SA, Kawai S, Nakamura S, Kim HR, Goto N, Arisue N, Palacpac NM, Honma H, Yagi M, Tougan T, Katakai Y, Kaneko O, Mita T, Kita K, Yasutomi Y, Sutton PL, Shakhbatyan R, Horii T, Yasunaga T, Barnwell JW, Escalante AA, Carlton JM, Tanabe K: Plasmodium cynomolgi genome sequences provide insight into Plasmodium vivax and the monkey malaria clade. Nat Genet. 2012, 44: 1051-1055.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Lim C, Hansen E, DeSimone TM, Moreno Y, Junker K, Bei A, Brugnara C, Buckee CO, Duraisingh MT: Expansion of host cellular niche can drive adaptation of a zoonotic malaria parasite to humans. Nat Commun. 2013, 4: 1638-PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Moon RW, Hall J, Rangkuti F, Ho YS, Almond N, Mitchell GH, Pain A, Holder AA, Blackman MJ: Adaptation of the genetically tractable malaria pathogen Plasmodium knowlesi to continuous culture in human erythrocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013, 110: 531-536.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Barber BE, William T, Grigg MJ, Menon J, Auburn S, Marfurt J, Anstey NM, Yeo TW: A prospective comparative study of knowlesi, falciparum, and vivax malaria in sabah, malaysia: high proportion with severe disease from Plasmodium knowlesi and Plasmodium vivax but no mortality with early referral and artesunate therapy. Clin Infect Dis. 2013, 56: 383-397.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Wang JY, Ding DB, Li GF, Zhao JH: Therapeutic efficacy of naphthoquine phosphate combined with artemisinine against Plasmodium knowlesi. Zhongguo Ji Sheng Chong Xue Yu Ji Sheng Chong Bing Za Zhi. 2008, 26: 442-444.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. William T, Menon J, Rajahram G, Chan L, Ma G, Donaldson S, Khoo S, Frederick C, Jelip J, Anstey NM, Yeo TW: Severe Plasmodium knowlesi malaria in a tertiary care hospital, Sabah, Malaysia. Emerg Infect Dis. 2011, 17: 1248-1255.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Co EM, Dennull RA, Reinbold DD, Waters NC, Johnson JD: Assessment of malaria in vitro drug combination screening and mixed-strain infections using the malaria Sybr green I-based fluorescence assay. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2009, 53: 2557-2563.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Tamez PA, Lantvit D, Lim E, Pezzuto JM: Chemosensitizing action of cepharanthine against drug-resistant human malaria, Plasmodium falciparum. J Ethnopharmacol. 2005, 98: 137-142.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Zalis MG, Pang L, Silveira MS, Milhous WK, Wirth DF: Characterization of Plasmodium falciparum isolated from the Amazon region of Brazil: evidence for quinine resistance. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1998, 58: 630-637.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Basco LK: Molecular epidemiology of malaria in cameroon. XX. Experimental studies on various factors of in vitro drug sensitivity assays using fresh isolates of Plasmodium falciparum. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2004, 70: 474-480.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Daneshvar C, Davis TM, Cox-Singh J, Rafa'ee MZ, Zakaria SK, Divis PC, Singh B: Clinical and parasitological response to oral chloroquine and primaquine in uncomplicated human Plasmodium knowlesi infections. Malar J. 2010, 9: 238-PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Tyagi RK, Das MK, Singh SS, Sharma YD: Discordance in drug resistance-associated mutation patterns in marker genes of Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium knowlesi during coinfections. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2013, 68: 1081-1088.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Cerutti Junior C, Marques C, Alencar FE, Durlacher RR, Alween A, Segurado AA, Pang LW, Zalis MG: Antimalarial drug susceptibility testing of Plasmodium falciparum in Brazil using a radioisotope method. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 1999, 94: 803-809.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Pickard AL, Wongsrichanalai C, Purfield A, Kamwendo D, Emery K, Zalewski C, Kawamoto F, Miller RS, Meshnick SR: Resistance to antimalarials in Southeast Asia and genetic polymorphisms in pfmdr1. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2003, 47: 2418-2423.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Price RN, Cassar C, Brockman A, Duraisingh M, van Vugt M, White NJ, Nosten F, Krishna S: The pfmdr1 gene is associated with a multidrug-resistant phenotype in Plasmodium falciparum from the western border of Thailand. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1999, 43: 2943-2949.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Tripathi R, Awasthi A, Dutta GP: Mefloquine resistance reversal action of ketoconazole - a cytochrome P450 inhibitor, against mefloquine-resistant malaria. Parasitology. 2005, 130: 475-479.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Lau YL, Tan LH, Chin LC, Fong MY, Noraishah MA, Rohela M: Plasmodium knowlesi reinfection in human. Emerg Infect Dis. 2011, 17: 1314-1315.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Price RN, Uhlemann AC, Brockman A, McGready R, Ashley E, Phaipun L, Patel R, Laing K, Looareesuwan S, White NJ, Nosten F, Krishna S: Mefloquine resistance in Plasmodium falciparum and increased pfmdr1 gene copy number. Lancet. 2004, 364: 438-447.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Fatih et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Advertisement