Open Access

Transcription of the var genes from a freshly-obtained field isolate of Plasmodium falciparum shows more variable switching patterns than long laboratory-adapted isolates

Malaria Journal201514:66

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-015-0565-y

Received: 14 October 2014

Accepted: 15 January 2015

Published: 7 February 2015

Abstract

Background

Antigenic variation in Plasmodium falciparum involves switching among multicopy var gene family and is responsible for immune evasion and the maintenance of chronic infections. Current understanding of var gene expression and switching patterns comes from experiments conducted on long laboratory-adapted strains, with little known about their wild counterparts.

Methods

Genome sequencing was used to obtain 50 var genes from a parasite isolated from the China-Myanmar border. Four clones with different dominant var genes were cultured in vitro in replicates for 50 generations. Transcription of the individual var gene was detected by real-time PCR and then the switching process was analysed.

Results

The expression of multicopy var genes is mutually exclusive in clones of a wild P. falciparum isolate. The activation of distinct primary dominant var genes leads to different and favoured switching patterns in the four clones. The on/off rates of individual var genes are variable and the choice of subsequent dominant var genes are random, which results in the different switching patterns among replicates of each clonal wild P. falciparum isolate with near identical initial transcription profiles.

Conclusions

This study suggests that the switching patterns of var genes are abundant, which consist of both conserved and random parts.

Keywords

Plasmodium falciparum var gene families Switching patterns Gene expression Transcription profiles Wild isolate

Background

Plasmodium falciparum is the most virulent form of the malaria species infecting humans, and is responsible for greatest mortality associated with the disease. Plasmodium falciparum erythrocyte membrane protein 1 (PfEMP1), expressed on the surface of infected red blood cells [1,2], plays a key role in the pathogenicity and immune evasion of P. falciparum [3]. PfEMP1s, encoded by the var multigene families, comprising an N terminal segment (NTS), variable numbers of Duffy binding-like domains (DBLα-ε), one or two cysteine-rich, inter-domain regions (CIDRα-γ), a transmembrane (TM) domain, a C2 domain, and a conserved intracellular acidic terminal segment (ATS) [4,5]. There are about 60 var genes in the P. falciparum clone 3D7 , although still under revision now [6], the most supported view is that each individual parasite expresses only a single var gene; the others are silenced in a process known as mutually exclusive expression [7,8]. Multiple means of genetic regulation mediate this process to protect the limited var gene repertoire [9-14].

Switching among the expression of different var genes allows parasites to avoid the effects of the acquired immune response generated by the host against PfEMP1 and, thus, to sustain a long-term infection. To date, in vitro research on var gene switching has been conducted either in clones or in phenotype-selected parasite lines where a dominant var gene is expressed. The effects of cellular memory ensure that most daughter parasites will express the same var gene [15-17]. This coordinates gene expression and ensures that the parasite’s repertoire of antigenic types is not rapidly exhausted.

There are three transcription states for a var gene: active, inactive but capable of being activated, and highly silenced [18]. The probability that a gene will be turned on or turned off is not associated with chromosomal position nor the type of promoter per se but rather on the intrinsic properties of each gene [16]. The initial dominant transcript determines the switch direction, while the ability to switch to particular variant types may depend on the antigenic switching history of the parasite [18-20]. Furthermore, switch rates have been suggested to be intrinsic and constant for the same var gene but different for individual var genes [18]. Switch rates have been estimated to be approximately 2% or less per generation in long-term in vitro cultures, but can reach 16% in hosts infected with the laboratory clone 3D7 [21,22]. Recent studies also showed that the switch on/off rate is associated with chromosomal position, with centrally located genes apparently more highly transcribed in vitro than those in sub-telomeric location [16,19,20,23,24], especially those that are short and highly diverse [25]. As a result of these intrinsic factors, the switching patterns of var genes are thought to be non-random. Indeed Recker et al. [26] revealed a highly structured switching pattern, consisting of an initially dominant transcript that switches via a set of switch-intermediates either to a new dominant transcript or back to the original. Similarly, Enderes et al. [20] also suggested the existence of an intrinsic var gene transcription programme that operates independently of genetic background.

The current understanding of var gene transcriptional regulation and switching comes from studies conducted on generations of in vitro long cultured laboratory-adapted parasite lines. Consequently, little is known of the processes operating especially within wild parasites. One of the difficulties with investigating wild isolates is the high sequence diversity observed among var genes. In addition, there is little genomic overlap of var genes among different P. falciparum isolates [27], making it difficult to determine the sequence of individual var genes. Despite the high diversity of var sequences, there are still some common structures among isolates, such as the semi-conserved head structure, consisting of NTS-DBLα-CIDR1 domains, and the single DBLα domain found in nearly each var gene [27-29]. Universal primers and var group-specific primers have been generated to amplify many DBLα sequences of field isolates and detect the transcription of var genes in clinical samples [24,30-34]. However, this approach is subject to error from primer bias and the over-estimation of the frequency of minor transcripts [35]. In addition, it is impossible to compare the transcription of each var gene quantitatively. To resolve this problem, var gene specific primer sets are needed (such as those recently designed for 3D7 and HB3) [25,36]. It may be possible to place the specific primers in the hypervariable regions of the DBLα domains [37], while it is first necessary to obtain sequences of the var gene repertoire of the wild isolates [27].

In this work, var gene sequences of a wild P. falciparum isolate were obtained by Illumina Solexa sequencing and then to investigate var gene switching in clonal wild P. falciparum isolates and compare these switching patterns with those reported for long cultured laboratory-adapted parasite isolates.

Methods

Parasite culture, genomic DNA extraction and genotyping

The wild isolate FCYN0906 was collected from the border area of south China (Yunnan Province) and Myanmar, and was approved by the Ethics Committee of Second Military Medical University. The patient was male and 25 years old with mild malaria. Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for the publication of this report and any accompanying images. The sample was thawed and cultivated at 3% haematocrit in RPMI 1640 medium (Invitrogen), supplemented with Albumax I (Invitrogen), hypoxanthine (Sigma) and gentamicin (Sigma). Parasites were incubated at 37°C in an atmosphere of 5% O2, 5% CO2, and 90% N2. Clones were obtained from the wild isolate by limiting dilution [38] (20 reinvasions passed since the isolate was taken from the patient). DNA was isolated using the QIAamp Mini Kit (Qiagen) and clones 4C, 4H, 5H, 6G were genotyped according to the DNA fragment length of eight microsatellite alleles (ARA2, TA1, TA60, TA81, TA87, TA109, Pfpk2, Polyα) as described [39].

Solexa sequencing, bio-informatic analysis and assembling of the var genes

Genomic DNA of clone FCYN0906-5H was prepared for the solexa sequencing. Two × 100 bp paired-end sequencing was done on a single lane of the Illumina HiSeq2000 following standard protocols. In total, 10,259,515 paired end reads were generated and the average coverage was 90×. The contigs were assembled by Velvet (version 1.2.03) and blasted with the PfEMP-1 protein sequence database in NCBI. All the contigs belong to var genes were predicted in VarDom 1.0 Service. A total of 66 sequences were found to correlate with DBLα, of which 47 had the 5′DIGDI and 3′PQFLR consensus sequences. Nineteen primers were designed to complete the DBLα domains combined with primers DBLα-AF/BR [30] through PCR and sequencing. Finally, 50 sequences (accession numbers: KJ856447-KJ856496) with DBLα domains were affirmed that present the var genes of the wild isolate individually. The 50 var genes were sub-grouped according to the upstream sequences blasted with the 5′ regions of 60 var genes in clone 3D7. Primers upsB-5′UTR and upsC-5′UTR [32] previous described were also helpful to identify three upsB subtype (var149, var25, var46) and four upsC subtype (var131, var163, var170, var51) var genes, respectively. Distance trees were constructed by the p-distance/neighbour-joining (NJ) method with 1,000 times bootstrap using MEGA version 4. Observed clusters from each tree were confirmed visually on alignments.

Sample preparation, RNA extraction and cDNA synthesis

Clone 4C, 4H, 5H, and 6G were thawed and the first transcriptional analysis was undertaken to identify the dominant var genes for each clone (30 reinvasions passed since the isolate was taken from the patient). The culture was then divided into two biological replicates and the transcriptional profiling was observed for 50 generations. Twelve-18-hour synchronic ring-stage parasites were harvested every ten generations. Then the four clones were thawed again and the whole process repeated. RNA was extracted using Trizol (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions and treated with Amplification Grade DNase I (Sigma) to remove the potential contamination of genomic DNA. cDNA was synthesized from 800 ng of RNA with random hexamers and oligo(dT) primers in a 30-μl reaction according to the manufacturer’s recommendations (Takara).

Primer design and quantitative real-time PCR

Fifty var gene-specific primer sets were designed depending on the hypervariable regions of the DBLα using primer 5 (see Additional file 1). All primer pairs were first tested on genomic DNA, PCR started with heating on 94°C for 5 min, followed by 30 cycles of 94°C for 30 sec, 60°C for 30 sec and 65°C for 20 sec. Final elongation was performed for 10 min at 65°C; the PCR products were sequenced and compared with the var gene sequences in MEGA4 to make sure the specificity of the primers. Then the amplification efficiencies of the primers were tested on ten-fold dilutions of genomic DNA. Specificity of amplification was ascertained by melting-curve analysis of each PCR product. Quantitative amplification was performed at a final primer concentration of 0.4 μM using Takara SYBR Premix Ex TaqTM in 15-μl reactions. All runs were done in triplicate under the condition 95°C 30 sec, followed by 40 cycles (95°C for 5 sec and 60°C for 30 sec) on the Roche LightCycler ®480II machine. Primer pairs varied >1.5 threshold cycle (Ct) values from the median or had effciency value (Amplifcation) < 1.85 were redesigned. The condition of the reaction was same for the cDNA. Specificity of amplification was ascertained by melting-curve analysis of each PCR product. Seryl-tRNA synthetase and fructose biphosphate aldolase were used as endogenous control genes. The ΔCt for each individual primer pair was calculated by subtracting the measured Ct value from the Ct value of the control seryl-tRNA synthetase. Relative copy numbers were obtained with the formula 2-ΔCt.

Calculation of on and off rates for individual var loci

The switching on/off rates were calculated as previously described [19]: the increase or decrease of the expression of the var gene between two time points divided by the number of generations between these two time points.

Results

Identification of 50 var genes in the genome of the wild Plasmodium falciparum isolate

Four clones from the wild P. falciparum isolate FCYN0906 were obtained by limiting dilution (designated as FCYN0906-4C, 4H, 5H, and 6G), which exhibited identical genotypes when analysed with eight microsatellites (see Additional file 2). One clone (FCYN0906-5H) genome was sequenced and the reads were assembled into contigs to obtain 50 partial var gene sequences (see Methods for more details). These 50 partial var gene sequences represented the 50 var genes of the wild isolate because each sequence had a DBLα domain that was separated from DBL(β-ζ) (Figure 1a). In addition, 42 sequences possessed an NTS domain. A total of 38 var genes were sub-grouped according to their 5′ flanking sequence (50–500 bp) and the phylogenetic analysis of DBLα sequences (Figure 1b). Eleven upsA, 18 upsB, seven upsC, one upsD, one upsE var genes were identified, while the remaining 12 genes belonged to either the upsB or upsC sub-group (Figure 2).
Figure 1

Subclassification of DBL domains of FCYN0906-5H. a. Distance tree of DBL sequences of FCYN0906-5H generated using the p-distance/NJ method. DBL domains are divided into six major groups and the DBLα branch separated from the other groups. b. Phylogenetic trees of all DBLα amino acid sequences between the laboratory clone (3D7) and the wild isolate(FCYN0906-5H). The var genes of 3D7 are labelled as circles and those of FCYN0906-5H are labelled as triangles. Var gene groups are marked by different colours. Although upsB and upsC sub-groups overlapped, the upsA sub-group could be distinguished from others. Meanwhile, var4 and var84 had no upstream sequences but were assumed to be a sub-type of upsA as they were also within the upsA sub-group.

Figure 2

Schematic diagram of the repertoire of var genes of the wild Plasmodium isolate, FCYN0906-5H. The gene names, Ups sequence type and domain architecture are listed. Where known, the var genes have been grouped according to 5′ flanking sequence (Ups type). The extracellular domains of PfEMP1 have been classified by sequence criteria. * var4 and var84 had no upstream sequences but had DBLα sequences of group A. # indicates var genes that had no upstream sequences but belong to either group B or group C according to the DBLα amino acid sequences.

Mutually exclusive expression of var genes in clonal wild isolates

Fifty var gene-specific primer sets were designed depending on the hypervariable regions of the DBLα sequences (see Additional file 1). The var gene expression of four clones (FCYN0906-4C, 4H, 5H, 6G) was measured as soon as the culture reached the required parasitaemia (2-5%). Real-time PCR results showed that all four clones had different dominant var genes, of which the proportion of the total signal was 61, 69, 44 and 57%, respectively (Figure 3). Interestingly, var21 (upsB group) was the second dominant var gene among all four clones. So despite the presence of minor transcripts, the allelic exclusion of var genes was evident in this wild isolate, just as in long laboratory-adapted clone 3D7.
Figure 3

Histograms showing the mutually exclusive expression of var genes in the four clones. The four clones expressed different dominant var genes which were present at proportions ranging from 44 to 69%. There were also minor transcripts with var21 as the second dominant var gene across all four clones.

The var gene switching patterns of the four clones

According to the results of Enderes et al. [20], var gene switching patterns occur via a conserved switching programme. Thus each clone culture was divided into two replicates to determine whether these near-identical replicates exhibited the same switching pattern. For the next 50 generations, ring-stage parasites were harvested every ten generations and the transcription level of the var genes measured by real-time PCR with 50 gene-specific primer sets; then the whole process was repeated. Results showed different switching patterns among the four clones (see Additional file 3). Surprisingly, switching directions were also various within the four replicates of each clone, which was contrary to those reported in previous studies [20]. The dominant transcripts were often upsB or upsC var genes and the upsA var genes of the wild isolate were rarely activated during the experiment. Figure 4 shows the stages in the switching of the dominant transcript. The reproducibility of data is further evidenced in Additional file 4.
Figure 4

Diagram depicting the variable var gene switching patterns of the four clones and the replicates. The second dominant var gene was identified when its transcription level reached 40% of that of the dominant var gene. Clone 4C: var167 switches to var21 in 4C-A, 4C-D, var143 in 4C-C, and var98 in 4C-B. However, at the last time point, the dominant var gene in 4C-A, 4C-B, both switch to var45. Clone 4H: var15 is maintained for over 50 generations in 4H-A, 4H-B, however, its expression falls in 4H-C, 4H-D, switches to var21 in 4H-C. Clone5H: var51 switches off quickly and immediately switches to var21 in 5H-A, 5H-B, but in 5H-C, 5H-D, var51 slows down the off rate and switches to var45, var212. Clone 6G: var47 switches to var136 in 6G-A and var21 in 6G-B. The change in the transcriptional trend is similar in 6G-C and 6G-D; var47 switches to var163 gradually. var51 and var47 were predicted to be upsC and upsB group individually, var167 and var15 should belong to either upsB or upsC but not upsA group from the phylogenetic trees of all var-DBLα-contig amino acid sequences of the wild isolate.

Expression of distinct dominant var genes among the four clones

Previous work has suggested that the activation of different var loci in an isogenic background results in different switching patterns [18-20]. Hence, the ability to switch to particular variants might depend on the antigenic switching history of the parasite. In this study, except the more active var21 and var45, each clone favoured particular var genes that were not expressed strongly in the other clones (e.g., var147, var98, var143 in clone 4C, var15 in clone 4H, var51, var212 in clone 5H, var47, var163, var136 in clone 6G). For this reason, the initial var gene transcription level of the four clones were compared. At the first time point, the initial transcription level was similar across the four replicates of every clone (see Additional file 3). This suggests that the four clones differed primarily in their expression of distinct dominant var genes, which led to different and favoured switching patterns, consistent with previous findings. However, this suggestion cannot explain the variety of switching patterns observed among the replicates of the same clone, with near-exact initial transcription profiles.

Switching on/off rates of a var gene are variable

Previous work has shown that on/off rates vary dramatically among different var genes, while in isogenic clones that express the same var gene on/off rates are constant and appear to be an intrinsic property of that particular gene. However, results of this study showed that for a given var gene, the switching on/off rates were not always the same and could be activated and silenced at high speed or just with a slow process (Table 1). Furthermore, var51 even switched back in 5H-C and 5H-D although it switched off quickly in 5H-A and 5H-B. A greater number of switching patterns were observed since the dominant var gene could persist for a long time, switch back, switch to an alternative dominant var gene slowly or immediately. Indeed, this was an important factor mediating the variety of switching directions among the replicates. In accordance with previous findings, there were also some var genes that exhibited constant switching on/off rates in different clones or replicates over 20 generations (see Additional file 5).
Table 1

Variability in on/off rates of the var genes over 20 generations

  

Fast

  

Slow

  

On/off rate

Var gene

Clone

Change of proportional var transcript levels*

Mean rate

Clone

Change of proportional var transcript levels*

Mean rate

On rate

var98

4C-B

2%-29%-42%

2%

4C-D

2.3%-8%-11%

0.44%

 

var45

5H-C

1%-6%-57%

2.8%

5H-D

0.14%-0.26%-2.24%

0.11%

 

var136

6G-A

2%-16%-48%

2.3%

6G-D

1%-1%-1.7%

0.04%

 

var21

5H-B

13%-14%-74%

3.05%

5H-C

11%-17%-25%

0.7%

Off rate

var98

4C-B

42%-32%-11%

1.55%

5H-D

2.5%-1.5%-1.3%

0.06%

 

var51

5H-A

44%-33%-3%

2.05%

5H-B

5.2%-0.8%-0.1%

0.26%

 

var167

4C-C

44%-18%-14%

1.5%

6G-D

1.5%-0.9%-0.5%

0.05%

 

var47

6G-B

34%-20%-19%

0.75%

4C-C

0.9%-0.5%-0.4%

0.03%

Var genes can switch on/off quickly or slowly. The mean on/off rates were calculated according to the change of proportional var transcript levels over the 20 generations.

*during 20 generations.

Switching patterns

When the dominant var gene switch off slowly, the switching patterns of the two replicates that derived from the same culture were compared. Changes of the transcription profiles were similar, especially within the first three time points (30 generations after division). For example, when the var167 switched off, var98, var21, var143 switched on preferentially in both replicates 4C-C and 4C-D, suggesting a conserved switching process. However, the choice of subsequent dominant var gene appeared to be random so that the switch directions of the two replicates changed. This phenomenon was confirmed in the other clones (such as 5H-C and 5H-D, 6G-A and 6G-B). Hence, switch patterns could consist of both conserved and random processes.

Discussion

Studies on gene expression in the P. falciparum clone 3D7 have shown that the mutually exclusive expression of virulence genes is used by the parasite to slow the depletion of the limited number of genes contained in the multicopy var gene family [7,8]. However, it is still unknown whether the same strategy is used in other isolates. In this study, a wild isolate was chosen and the transcription levels of the entire var gene repertoire are quantitative and comparable. The results showed that each of the initial clones exhibited a distinct dominant var gene and then could even reach 90% of the total signal, which confirm the allelic exclusion of var genes in this wild isolate.

Previous studies about the clinical P. falciparum isolates have shown that during the in vitro adaption of the parasites, the transcription of var genes changed a lot. The ups A var genes declined and upsB and upsC var genes were activated frequently [24,34,37]. The var genes in this wild isolate could be found as both active and inactive types and most upsA var genes were silenced and rarely activated. In particular, var21 was more active in all the four clones and it was clearly recognized by the mutually exclusive expression system as in clone 5H. Thus like var27 and var29 that were preferentially expressed in the laboratory strain HB3 [25], var21 is the gene preferred by isolate FCYN0906.

The switching of var genes has been extensively studied in clone 3D7. Horrocks et al. [18] first noted that some transitions appear to be disallowed depending on the recent variant antigen expression history of the parasite clone. Similarly, Enderes et al. [20] also found that the last active var locus has an influence on subsequent var gene activation. In this study, the four clones had different initial dominant var genes. The following switching patterns and the subsequent activated var genes seemed to be favoured by each clone, which was in agreement with previous studies.

Previous research has suggested that the rate at which the individual var genes become transcriptionally activated or silenced (on/off rates) are particular to individual genes and relatively stable over time [18,19]. However, the results of this study indicated that the on/off rates of var genes in the wild isolate were highly variable. As there were also some var genes with constant on/off rates, it is possible that variable rates also exist among the laboratory strains, but Horrocks happened to investigate var genes that exhibited constant on/off rates. Recker et al. [26] showed that simple differences in switch rates could not explain their switching data, and instead proposed a mechanism of biased switching to explain the very high on rates and very low off rates they observed. Their best model, however, still assumed that the switch rates and switch biases themselves were constant. Although the model is improved continuously [25,40], if the switch rates and switch biases of individual var genes were intrinsic and constant, then the replicates with near-identical initial transcription profiles would be expected to have the same switching pattern, but not for all four clones. In other studies, however, var genes have been found to switch rapidly once the first gene has been expressed, with subsequent switching occurring at a much lower rate [22], and switching rates can be much higher in individual clinical isolates [34] which may be influenced by the physiological states of the patients. The variability of the switch rates of var genes could also be an explanation of the high on rates and very low off rates generally observed. The advantage of this would be that it ensures that the dominant var gene is maintained when it is optimal for the infection, but allows it to change rapidly once it is recognized by the immune system. A recent study showed that disrupting PfSET2/RNA pol II interactions in transgenic parasites induced rapid var gene expression switching [41]. The ability of the wild isolate to accelerate the var gene expression switching needs to be further studied.

Frank et al. [19] indicated that despite the long-term bias towards expression of var genes with low off rates, there was no predetermined order of var gene expression that ensures the generation of heterogeneous var gene expression patterns. However, in their study, transcription levels were monitored at long intervals, while close attention was only paid to the particular var genes to which each clone switched. Enderes et al. [20] suggests the existence of an intrinsic var gene transcription process that occurs independently of genetic background. However, in that study, due to epigenetic memory, there were no switches of the dominant var genes in transgenic parasites and filed parasites during the whole experiment. The same conclusion would be reached if observations had stopped at 30 generations after the division. In fact, continuing culture of the isolates revealed that the following dominant transcripts were diverse and chosen randomly, leading to different patterns. Moreover, when the following dominant var genes happened to be identical, the two replicates like 6G-C and 6G-D still exhibited the same switching direction.

Conclusions

The data of this study show that the expression of multicopy var genes is mutually exclusive in clones of a wild P. falciparum isolate, that the var genes on/off rates are variable, and that the dominant var gene can persist for a long time, or switch back, or switch either slowly or immediately to an alternative dominant var gene. When the initial dominant var gene is maintained, or is gradually reduced, variation in transcription levels follows a conserved switching process. When the expression of the dominant var genes falls it is accompanied by the switching on of other dominant var genes that appear to be expressed at random. The data reveal that switching patterns are not solely the result of an intrinsic, conserved process, but a result of both conserved and random processes. Hence, the complete switching process of multicopy var genes is more complex than previously described.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 31370785). We thank Dr Qingfeng Zhang for critical comments on the manuscript.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Tropical Infectious Disease, Second Military Medical University
(2)
Shanghai-Ministry of Science and Technology Key Laboratory of Health and Disease Genomics, Chinese National Human Genome Center at Shanghai
(3)
Institute for Infectious Diseases and Vaccine Development, Tongji University School of Medicine

References

  1. Su XZ, Heatwole VM, Wertheimer SP, Guinet F, Herrfeldt JA, Peterson DS, et al. The large diverse gene family var encodes proteins involved in cytoadherence and antigenic variation of Plasmodium falciparum-infected erythrocytes. Cell. 1995;82:89–100.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Baruch DI, Pasloske BL, Singh HB, Bi X, Ma XC, Feldman M, et al. Cloning the P. falciparum gene encoding PfEMP1, a malarial variant antigen and adherence receptor on the surface of parasitized human erythrocytes. Cell. 1995;82:77–87.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Smith JD, Chitnis CE, Craig AG, Roberts DJ, Hudson-Taylor DE, Peterson DS, et al. Switches in expression of Plasmodium falciparum var genes correlate with changes in antigenic and cytoadherent phenotypes of infected erythrocytes. Cell. 1995;82:101–10.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Kraemer SM, Smith JD. A family affair: var genes, PfEMP1 binding, and malaria disease. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2006;9:374–80.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Smith JD, Subramanian G, Gamain B, Baruch DI, Miller LH. Classification of adhesive domains in the Plasmodium falciparum erythrocyte membrane protein 1 family. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 2000;110:293–310.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Joergensen L, Bengtsson DC, Bengtsson A, Ronander E, Berger SS, Turner L, et al. Surface co-expression of two different PfEMP1 antigens on single plasmodium falciparum-infected erythrocytes facilitates binding to ICAM1 and PECAM1. PLoS Pathog. 2010;6:e1001083.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Scherf A, Hernandez-Rivas R, Buffet P, Bottius E, Benatar C, Pouvelle B, et al. Antigenic variation in malaria: in situ switching, relaxed and mutually exclusive transcription of var genes during intra-erythrocytic development in Plasmodium falciparum. EMBO J. 1998;17:5418–26.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Dzikowski R, Frank M, Deitsch K. Mutually exclusive expression of virulence genes by malaria parasites is regulated independently of antigen production. PLoS Pathog. 2006;2:e22.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Guizetti J, Scherf A. Silence, activate, poise and switch! Mechanisms of antigenic variation in Plasmodium falciparum. Cell Microbiol. 2013;15:718–26.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Zhang Q, Siegel TN, Martins RM, Wang F, Cao J, Gao Q, et al. Exonuclease-mediated degradation of nascent RNA silences genes linked to severe malaria. Nature. 2014;513:431–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Jiang L, Mu J, Zhang Q, Ni T, Srinivasan P, Rayavara K, et al. PfSETvs methylation of histone H3K36 represses virulence genes in Plasmodium falciparum. Nature. 2013;499:223–7.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Brancucci NM, Witmer K, Schmid CD, Flueck C, Voss TS. Identification of a cis-acting DNA-protein interaction implicated in singular var gene choice in Plasmodium falciparum. Cell Microbiol. 2012;14:1836–48.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Tonkin CJ, Carret CK, Duraisingh MT, Voss TS, Ralph SA, Hommel M, et al. Sir2 paralogues cooperate to regulate virulence genes and antigenic variation in Plasmodium falciparum. PLoS Biol. 2009;7:e84.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Perez-Toledo K, Rojas-Meza AP, Mancio-Silva L, Hernandez-Cuevas NA, Delgadillo DM, Vargas M, et al. Plasmodium falciparum heterochromatin protein 1 binds to tri-methylated histone 3 lysine 9 and is linked to mutually exclusive expression of var genes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009;37:2596–606.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Dzikowski R, Deitsch KW. Active transcription is required for maintenance of epigenetic memory in the malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum. J Mol Biol. 2008;382:288–97.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Fastman Y, Noble R, Recker M, Dzikowski R. Erasing the epigenetic memory and beginning to switch–the onset of antigenic switching of var genes in Plasmodium falciparum. PLoS One. 2012;7:e34168.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Chookajorn T, Dzikowski R, Frank M, Li F, Jiwani AZ, Hartl DL, et al. Epigenetic memory at malaria virulence genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104:899–902.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Horrocks P, Pinches R, Christodoulou Z, Kyes SA, Newbold CI. Variable var transition rates underlie antigenic variation in malaria. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101:11129–34.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Frank M, Dzikowski R, Amulic B, Deitsch K. Variable switching rates of malaria virulence genes are associated with chromosomal position. Mol Microbiol. 2007;64:1486–98.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Enderes C, Kombila D, Dal-Bianco M, Dzikowski R, Kremsner P, Frank M. Var Gene promoter activation in clonal Plasmodium falciparum isolates follows a hierarchy and suggests a conserved switching program that is independent of genetic background. J Infect Dis. 2011;204:1620–31.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Roberts DJ, Craig AG, Berendt AR, Pinches R, Nash G, Marsh K, et al. Rapid switching to multiple antigenic and adhesive phenotypes in malaria. Nature. 1992;357:689–92.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Peters J, Fowler E, Gatton M, Chen N, Saul A, Cheng Q. High diversity and rapid changeover of expressed var genes during the acute phase of Plasmodium falciparum infections in human volunteers. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99:10689–94.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Peters JM, Fowler EV, Krause DR, Cheng Q, Gatton ML. Differential changes in Plasmodium falciparum var transcription during adaptation to culture. J Infect Dis. 2007;195:748–55.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Zhang Q, Zhang Y, Huang Y, Xue X, Yan H, Sun X, et al. From in vivo to in vitro: dynamic analysis of Plasmodium falciparum var gene expression patterns of patient isolates during adaptation to culture. PLoS One. 2011;6:e20591.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Noble R, Christodoulou Z, Kyes S, Pinches R, Newbold CI, Recker M. The antigenic switching network of Plasmodium falciparum and its implications for the immuno-epidemiology of malaria. Elife. 2013;2:e01074.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Recker M, Buckee CO, Serazin A, Kyes S, Pinches R, Christodoulou Z, et al. Antigenic variation in Plasmodium falciparum malaria involves a highly structured switching pattern. PLoS Pathog. 2011;7:e1001306.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Kraemer SM, Kyes SA, Aggarwal G, Springer AL, Nelson SO, Christodoulou Z, et al. Patterns of gene recombination shape var gene repertoires in Plasmodium falciparum: comparisons of geographically diverse isolates. BMC Genomics. 2007;8:45.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Gardner MJ, Hall N, Fung E, White O, Berriman M, Hyman RW, et al. Genome sequence of the human malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum. Nature. 2002;419:498–511.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Rask TS, Hansen DA, Theander TG, Gorm Pedersen A, Lavstsen T. Plasmodium falciparum erythrocyte membrane protein 1 diversity in seven genomes–divide and conquer. PLoS Comput Biol. 2010;6(9):e1000933.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Bull PC, Berriman M, Kyes S, Quail MA, Hall N, Kortok MM, et al. Plasmodium falciparum variant surface antigen expression patterns during malaria. PLoS Pathog. 2005;1:e26.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Barry AE, Leliwa-Sytek A, Tavul L, Imrie H, Migot-Nabias F, Brown SM, et al. Population genomics of the immune evasion (var) genes of Plasmodium falciparum. PLoS Pathog. 2007;3:e34.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Falk N, Kaestli M, Qi W, Ott M, Baea K, Cortes A, et al. Analysis of Plasmodium falciparum var genes expressed in children from Papua New Guinea. J Infect Dis. 2009;200:347–56.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Kaestli M, Cockburn IA, Cortes A, Baea K, Rowe JA, Beck HP. Virulence of malaria is associated with differential expression of Plasmodium falciparum var gene subgroups in a case–control study. J Infect Dis. 2006;193:1567–74.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Bachmann A, Predehl S, May J, Harder S, Burchard GD, Gilberger TW, et al. Highly co-ordinated var gene expression and switching in clinical Plasmodium falciparum isolates from non-immune malaria patients. Cell Microbiol. 2011;13:1397–409.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Golnitz U, Albrecht L, Wunderlich G. Var transcription profiling of Plasmodium falciparum 3D7: assignment of cytoadherent phenotypes to dominant transcripts. Malar J. 2008;7:14.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Salanti A, Staalsoe T, Lavstsen T, Jensen ATR, Sowa MPK, Arnot DE, et al. Selective upregulation of a single distinctly structured var gene in chondroitin sulphate A-adhering Plasmodium falciparum involved in pregnancy-associated malaria. Mol Microbiol. 2003;49:179–91.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Blomqvist K, Normark J, Nilsson D, Ribacke U, Orikiriza J, Trillkott P, et al. var gene transcription dynamics in Plasmodium falciparum patient isolates. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 2010;170:74–83.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Kirkman LA, Su XZ, Wellems TE. Plasmodium falciparum: isolation of large numbers of parasite clones from infected blood samples. Exp Parasitol. 1996;83:147–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Anderson TJ, Su XZ, Bockarie M, Lagog M, Day KP. Twelve microsatellite markers for characterization of Plasmodium falciparum from finger-prick blood samples. Parasitology. 1999;119:113–25.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Noble R, Recker M. A statistically rigorous method for determining antigenic switching networks. PLoS One. 2012;7:e39335.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Ukaegbu UE, Kishore SP, Kwiatkowski DL, Pandarinath C, Dahan-Pasternak N, Dzikowski R, et al. Recruitment of PfSET2 by RNA polymerase II to variant antigen encoding loci contributes to antigenic variation in P. falciparum. PLoS Pathog. 2014;10:e1003854.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Ye et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Advertisement