Skip to main content

Extracellular vesicles in malaria: an agglomeration of two decades of research

Abstract

Malaria is a complex parasitic disease, caused by Plasmodium spp. More than a century after the discovery of malaria parasites, this disease continues to pose a global public health problem and the pathogenesis of the severe forms of malaria remains incompletely understood. Extracellular vesicles (EVs), including exosomes and microvesicles, have been increasingly researched in the field of malaria in a bid to fill these knowledge gaps. EVs released from Plasmodium-infected red blood cells and other host cells during malaria infection are now believed to play key roles in disease pathogenesis and are suggested as vital components of the biology of Plasmodium spp. Malaria-derived EVs have been identified as potential disease biomarkers and therapeutic tools. In this review, key findings of malaria EV studies over the last 20 years are summarized and critically analysed. Outstanding areas of research into EV biology are identified. Unexplored EV research foci for the future that will contribute to consolidating the potential for EVs as agents in malaria prevention and control are proposed.

Background

Malaria is one of the oldest diseases known to man [1] yet it remains a global public health problem with over 3.4 billion of the world’s population at risk of infection [2]. It is a complex parasitic disease and infection may progress from asymptomatic malaria through uncomplicated, severe, and fatal malaria, with non-immune children and adults at greater risk of severe malaria and death. The foremost factor determining the clinical manifestation is the infecting parasite species. Severe malaria is known to occur by infection with the human-only Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax species, as well as by zoonotic Plasmodium knowlesi infections [3]. Major severe malaria syndromes include severe anaemia, metabolic acidosis, multiorgan failure and cerebral malaria (CM), which is characterized by coma and other neurological complications [4]. CM remains unreported in knowlesi infections [5, 6], but is being increasingly reported in children and adults infected with P. vivax [7,8,9,10,11]. Plasmodium falciparum is the most medically important Plasmodium spp. and is known to be highly associated with CM [4, 12]. CM is the leading cause of malaria-related deaths and in 2018, P. falciparum accounted for over 90% of the globally estimated 400,000 malaria deaths [2].

The pathogenic basis of CM is poorly understood but involves profound adhesive properties of P. falciparum and host immune responses that converge on a compromised brain microvasculature [4, 13,14,15]. CM due to P. vivax is a fairly new concept and remarkably less is known about the pathogenesis of the severe forms of vivax malaria [16]. Towards elucidating the pathophysiology of severe malaria, particularly CM, extracellular vesicles (EVs) as mediators of long-distance cell-cell communication, have been proposed as integral components in the pathobiology of malaria [17,18,19].

Since the earliest observations of EVs in human plasma were made [20, 21], their importance in numerous physiological and pathological processes has become increasingly evident as decades of intense research on EVs released from mammalian cells ensued [22,23,24]. Recently, investigation of EVs in pathogenic parasites gained traction and studies have shown that not only do EVs play important roles in immunomodulation and parasite survival as well as disease pathogenesis in protozoan and helminth infections, they also have promising applications in the diagnosis and treatment of parasitic disease [25,26,27].

Over the last two decades, EVs in malaria have been investigated in human field studies as well as in in vivo, in vitro and ex vivo experimental studies. In this review, these studies and how they have advanced the understanding of the importance of host and parasite derived EVs in malaria pathogenesis and biology are examined. an analysis of the evidence supporting malaria EVs as potential biomarkers and therapeutic tools is provided. Until recently, the majority of these studies designated EVs with respect to their biogenesis as microparticles, microvesicles or exosomes without clearly demonstrating their cellular origin. Taking this into consideration, these vesicles will be referred to generically as EVs throughout this review. For studies that adopted the International Society for Extracellular Vesicles (ISEV) nomenclature guidelines with reference to size i.e., small EVs and medium EVs [28] these will be referred to accordingly.

Exosomes and microvesicles are released from viable cells. While both are membrane bound structures, exosomes originate from multivesicular bodies (MVB) and are released as vesicles of 50-100 nm in diameter from the cell following fusion of the MVB and plasma membrane; microvesicles on the other hand, are formed directly from the plasma membrane by outward budding and have a diameter of 100-350 nm though may be larger [29].

Discovering a repertoire of multifunctional biomarkers

In parasitic infections, EVs may be released directly by the parasite, by parasite-infected host cells, and/or by effector cells in response to infection [30, 31]. Invariably, parasite infection results in elevated EV concentrations in the plasma and other body fluids [18, 30]. This was observed in early studies of human and murine malaria, all of which focused on plasma derived EVs from platelets (PEVs), endothelial cells (EEVs), red blood cells (REVs), monocytes (MEVs) and lymphocytes (LEVs).

Elevated circulating EEV levels were the first to be observed in a clinical study of Malawian children, where there was a sixfold increase in EEVs in patients with CM [32]. This was followed by a clinical study in Cameroon that sought to delineate the involvement of multiple host cells in vesiculation in malaria. From the most to the least elevated, significantly higher titres of PEVs, REVs, EEVs, MEVs, and LEVs were detected in CM patients [33]. Reports of similar EV increases were made in India, although the order of increasing cell source titres in patients with severe malaria (which included CM, non-cerebral severe malaria and multiorgan dysfunction) was PEVs, EEVs and REVs [34, 35]. A Thailand study focusing only on plasma REVs across three human malarias found them to be markedly elevated in uncomplicated falciparum malaria and most significantly elevated in patients with severe falciparum malaria [36]. This study also reported slightly higher REV concentrations in malariae malaria and vivax malaria [36], although it was previously shown in Brazil that patients with uncomplicated vivax malaria had markedly raised plasma REVs, PEVs and LEVs compared to uninfected controls [17]. In murine models of CM, platelets, endothelial cells, and red blood cells (RBCs) have been shown to be the major host cell sources of plasma EVs [37,38,39,40]. LEVs and MEVs have been the least detected [40, 41].

Arguably, there have been discrepancies in reports of the host cell sources of EVs and, therefore, discrepancies in the distribution of plasma EV populations in the different malarial infections across human populations in malaria endemic regions, as well as in murine malaria models. This observed variance, particularly in human field studies of plasma EVs in malaria [17, 32,33,34,35,36, 42] may be attributed to several crucial factors (Table 1). With the exception of the study conducted in Malawi [32], the sample sizes for EV quantification and classification in the clinical studies were small, ranging from 36 to 146 samples. Different EV isolation methods were employed, with some studies using medium speed centrifugation and others using high speed ultracentrifugation. These methods are sequential steps in the differential centrifugation process (Fig. 1) [43]. They separate EVs, according to their size and density, into medium EVs (mEVs, likely to be microvesicles) and small EVs (sEVs, mainly exosomes), respectively [28, 43, 44]. The majority of these studies used medium speed centrifugation, hence the few that employed ultracentrifugation may have analysed plasma EV isolates that were poorly representative of the mEV subpopulation. All these studies, however, analysed EVs using flow cytometry that is limited by low sensitivity [45] and consequently, poor inter-study comparability. Nevertheless, flow cytometry has been, and remains, an invaluable tool for EV analysis. Lastly, different host cell sources were investigated across the studies, further constraining inter-study comparability.

Table 1 Factors affecting inter-study comparability of human field studies of plasma EVs in malaria
Fig. 1
figure1

Schematic representation of EV separation by differential centrifugation. The differential centrifugation technique separates EVs according to their size and density into medium EVs (white, >200 nm) and small EVs (green, <200 nm). Medium to large EVs are first pelleted by centrifugation at 10,000–20,000×g. The supernatant from this initial centrifugation step is then spun down at 100,000–200,000×g to obtain small EVs

A salient observation made by the human studies was that the increased EV titres detected during acute malaria significantly decreased at the time of patient recovery, returning to baseline levels in most cases. Thus, an association between EVs and malaria was established with the consensus that EVs are potential biomarkers for disease, specifically falciparum and vivax malaria. In the case of falciparum malaria, certain published data suggested that plasma EVs may be a biomarker for CM—to be used for disease management and monitoring cure rates—since abnormally high levels of EVs correlated specifically with neurological symptoms of CM, but not other forms of severe malaria or uncomplicated falciparum malaria [32, 33]. In a recent study, however, a large cohort of patients presenting with uncomplicated falciparum malaria were shown to have markedly raised plasma mEV titres. This was considerably higher in patients under age 11 and over age 45 than in the 12–44 age group and uninfected controls [42]. As mentioned, markedly raised plasma EVs have previously been detected in uncomplicated falciparum malaria with EV levels falling drastically within 24 h after commencing anti-malarial treatment [36]. Respectively, these findings imply that plasma EVs may be useful predictors of severe disease in vulnerable age groups with poor immunity to malaria [42] and serve as pharmacodynamic biomarkers if an apparent link is made between malaria EVs and specific anti-malarial/adjunctive therapies. Furthermore, whilst these EV titres were remarkably elevated very early in infection, a positive correlation with parasitaemia was observed, suggesting parasite-infected RBCs are a major source of EVs, which would suggest that plasma EVs are potential malaria diagnostic biomarkers [42].

So far, the exception for an association between severe malaria and plasma EV levels has been placental malaria, which occurs in pregnancy. Nevertheless, EVs have been flagged as potential biomarkers for placental malaria due to overexpression of specific EV bound molecules in active placental malaria cases [46].

EVs as biomarkers for severe malaria is an enticing prospect achievable only with intensified clinical and experimental studies to substantiate their potential role. Since EVs are released under physiological and many pathological conditions, and the nature of EVs varies within and among individuals, the cargo of EVs in malaria are likely quite heterogenous and needs to be investigated thoroughly. This is imperative in determining whether or not malaria derived EVs may serve as diagnostic, monitoring, pharmacodynamic, predictive or prognostic markers. An in-depth knowledge of the diversity of EV cargo, as well as an understanding of the differences between biomarkers and their applications, will guide malaria EV research in the right direction towards validating malaria EVs as biomarkers, particularly of cerebral malaria.

Nevertheless, the assertion that plasma EVs in malaria may fulfil applications as multifunctional biomarkers has spawned several scientific questions, setting in motion a succession of functional studies centred on the pathogenic role EVs may play in severe malaria. These are presented below.

The pathogenesis of malaria: a potential role for EVs

Plasma extracellular vesicles

Membrane vesiculation is a cellular process that is largely dependent on the ATP-binding cassette transporter A1 (ABCA1) [47, 48]. Located primarily on the cell membrane, ABCA1 regulates the transmembrane distribution of a key lipid component of EVs, phosphatidylserine [47]. A murine model of CM showed that in ABCA1 gene knockout mice, EV shedding was drastically reduced, and the mice did not show any apparent CM-associated neurological signs or histopathology [38]. In humans, EV release was considerably lower in patients with uncomplicated malaria/ non-cerebral severe malaria and polymorphisms in the ABCA1 gene, while in patients with CM/multiorgan dysfunction and the wildtype ABCA1 gene, EV release was remarkably higher [34]. These studies show that a reduced ability of cells to vesiculate in the absence of ABCA1 or presence of “favourable” polymorphisms in this gene (in the context of malaria) confers protection against severe forms of malaria with a cerebral component, suggesting a pathogenic involvement of EVs in CM. Indeed, human polymorphisms may explain why CM occurs in less than 2 % of malaria patients [49]. ABCA1 gene is exceptionally polymorphic [50, 51] and may be at the core of the molecular mechanisms that underly the pathophysiological process by which EVs exacerbate CM.

With high plasma EV levels, there is an abundance of circulating tissue factor and phosphatidylserine (PS), both of which are procoagulant molecules that initiate coagulation and are enriched on the EV membrane [52]. In experimental CM (ECM), EVs were substantially shed in ABCA1 wild type mice. In vitro, these EVs had a potent procoagulant activity, the strength of which increased with increasing amounts of EVs [38]. Coagulopathy is important in the pathogenesis of CM, much of which is believed to occur in the brain [53]. EVs in CM may in fact make up a uniquely pathogenic population of EVs that preferentially accumulate in the brain and contribute to the dysregulated coagulation. It was shown that EVs, transferred from Plasmodium berghei infected mice with CM, localized in the brain microvasculature of recipient mice with CM but not in healthy controls or mice with non-CM [40]. This study also showed there is a rapid and acute rise in plasma EVs early in infection and during the neurological stage—both being critical timepoints in the pathogenesis of CM [40].

The cargo EVs carry is equally important as high EV titres in implicating EVs in malaria pathogenesis. Malaria EV cargo has been investigated in experimental malaria models [54,55,56,57,58] and human field studies [59,60,61] (Table 2). Proteomics identified 60 differentially abundant host proteins in ECM-EVs compared to non-infected EVs, while network analysis detected proteins implicated in fundamental pathogenic mechanisms of CM, such as endothelial and immune cell activation [57]. The presence of 2 host proteins—carbonic anhydrase 1 and S100A8—was further validated in this study. Detection of S100A8 almost exclusively in ECM-EVs, as well as two parasite proteins (intra-erythrocytic P. berghei-induced structures protein 1 and merozoite surface protein-1), is strongly suggestive of selective packaging into ECM-EVs [57] thereby distinguishing them from non-infected EVs and defining an association with a pathological state.

Table 2 Malaria plasma EV cargo from experimental malaria models and human field studies

Proteomic analysis of plasma EVs from out-patients infected with P. falciparum similarly identified a myriad of host proteins compared with uninfected controls [61]. Many of the identified host proteins were associated with complement activation, coagulation, and inflammation; notably 23 human RAB proteins were exclusively identified in falciparum malaria EVs [61]. RAB proteins are regulators of intracellular membrane trafficking in eukaryotic cells and modulate cytokine secretion in immune cells [62]. 29 P. falciparum proteins associated with parasite biology and virulence were identified, of which heat shock 70 kDa protein, Pf-enolase and Pf-actin had the highest frequencies of detection [61].

miRNAs are important regulators of gene expression. Protectively packaged into EVs, miRNAs are now known to play vital roles in protozoan and other infectious diseases [63, 64]. Plasmodium infection evidently alters miRNA expression, as distinct plasma EV-miRNA profiles in murine malaria models [58] and human malaria [60] have been identified. In EVs from P. berghei ECM, the expression of miR-146a and miR-193b was found to be significantly dysregulated compared to EVs in Plasmodium yoelii non-CM and non-infected mice; while miR-146a was markedly upregulated in EVs, miR-193b was downregulated [58]. In humans, when compared with uninfected individuals, the miRNA hsa-let-7a-5p was upregulated in EVs from patients with falciparum and vivax malaria, while miRNAs hsa-miR-150-5p and hsa-miR-15b-5p were both upregulated in vivax malaria alone [60]. These and other miRNAs have already been implicated in other neurological diseases and were predicted to be of importance in pathways relevant to malaria, such as EV biogenesis, inflammation, cytoadhesion, [58], adherens junction and transforming growth factor (TGF)-β pathways [60]. Furthermore, hsa-let-7a-5p miRNA, which was found in EVs from falciparum and vivax malaria patients, has known roles in host-parasite interactions [60].

Although the role of miRNAs in CM pathogenesis is unknown, the notable degree of altered expression in EVs from mice with CM and human malarial infection, as well as preliminary data from in vitro EV experiments on Plasmodium (discussed below), suggest a regulatory role for miRNAs in this disease. Moreover, miRNAs have been found to be differentially expressed in the brains of mice with CM and non-CM [65, 66]. In one study, miR-155, which alters the integrity of the blood brain barrier (BBB), was increased in plasma EVs isolated from CM susceptible mice relative to resistant mice. Following miR-155 knockout in these susceptible mice, survival was significantly improved and there was less damage to the BBB [67]. In a field study of pregnant women, miR-517c was twice as likely to be detected in EVs from women with active placental malaria than in uninfected pregnant women [46].

Focusing on P. falciparum malaria either in natural human infections or through extrapolations from murine CM studies, the data from gene knockouts, omics studies and gene association have cumulatively inferred a potential role for plasma derived EVs in malaria. Importantly, a study using P. vivax has rendered the first evidence of a direct pathophysiological mechanism by which plasma EVs in natural malaria infection may contribute to the pathogenesis of this disease [59].

It was noted that plasma EVs from acute human P. vivax infection are comprised mainly of a CD71+ EV (<200 nm) sub-population that carries human and parasite proteins, cautiously suggesting infected reticulocytes might be the main source of EVs in P. vivax infection [59]. Based on their observations, the authors described a mechanism where P. vivax infection derived EVs are actively taken up by human spleen fibroblasts, followed by translocation of the NF-kB transcription factor from the cytoplasm to the nucleus. This induces a TNF-independent upregulated surface expression of ICAM-1 on spleen fibroblasts, which results in the adherence of mature schizont stage P. vivax-infected reticulocytes to these cells [59]. The active uptake of plasma derived P. vivax EVs by spleen cells had been previously demonstrated [55]. This EV/ NF-kB/ ICAM-1 cytoadherence pathway is a novel discovery that merits validation and further investigation to uncover plasmodial molecules that may be directly involved and expose details of the mechanism. Since P. falciparum and P. berghei can infect reticulocytes, the discovery of this EV-directed pathway in CM would be quite compelling and stimulate new research foci.

Only recently has the potential severity and lethality of vivax malaria been acknowledged [11], the pathogenesis of which remains largely obscure. Cytoadherence and sequestration have been proposed as pathogenic mechanisms that P. vivax may have in common with P. falciparum [68, 69]. As laid out in the study by Toda and colleagues [59], P. vivax derived EVs may have a crucial role to play and set forward a paradigm shift in the understanding of P. vivax biology, its interaction with the human host and pathogenesis. Indeed, previously unknown aspects of P. falciparum biology and its communication with host cells have come to light in in vitro EV studies and will be discussed in later sections.

Cell-specific extracellular vesicles

The biomolecular constitution of EVs and their parent cells are as similar as they are different. This paradox is testament to a host of EV features, including (1) selective EV cargo packaging, (2) differential biodistribution and target cell-specificity, (3) distinct downstream cellular signalling pathways activated by EVs, and (4) specialized functions different from their cells of origin [23, 70,71,72]. EVs from different cells perform some common functions but certain EV populations primarily fulfill specific physiological and pathological roles, such as coagulation, inflammation, angiogenesis, cell cytotoxicity, antigen presentation, and immunoregulation. This phenomenon has been extensively reviewed [23, 73,74,75]. As such, the extent to which cell specific EVs contribute to different disease processes varies, and this has implications for their application in the diagnosis and treatment of diseases [76].

While the scientific evidence for a potential role of EVs in malaria gathered from clinical and experimental cerebral malaria studies is compelling, they are generalizations of plasma EVs from humans and mice. Over the last 2 decades, there have been a number of studies on cell specific EVs derived from the vascular endothelium, platelets, and RBCs. While these studies have generated more questions than answers, they have offered new insights into EV characteristics, and the potential involvement of EVs in the pathology of malaria. Importantly, a critical evaluation of the findings from these studies will direct future research.

Endothelial cell derived EVs (EEVs)

Endothelial cell (EC) activation is a core component of the pathophysiological events that occur in falciparum malaria. This is consequent of the distinctive cytoadherence of mature-stage infected RBCs (iRBCs) to the microvascular endothelium of various tissues and organs, including the brain in CM [12, 77]. ECs are known to respond to various stimuli [75]. One such response, demonstrated in vitro, is the shedding of EVs from TNF-activated ECs in thrombotic disorders [78]. Coupled with the knowledge of high TNF levels in malaria [79, 80], this observation prompted the first study of endothelial cell-derived EVs in this disease [32].

Patient derived-ECs in CM and non-CM have been shown to respond differently to TNF stimulation ex vivo with significantly increased shedding of EVs in the former [81]. Considering the important role TNF plays in the pathology of CM (15), differential EEV shedding in response to this pro-inflammatory cytokine is substantial enough to warrant further investigation of the role EEVs may play in this disease. For the first time, in 2014, a series of experiments investigated the pathogenicity of TNF-activated EEVs in mice [40]. When in vitro generated EEVs were injected into healthy mice, they were rapidly cleared from circulation and induced lesions in the brain and lungs, similar to those seen in human CM (HCM) and ECM [40]. These findings suggest that the brain and lungs may be preferred EEV sites where they cause cell damage, and provides evidence for their potential pathogenicity in CM.

The correlation between EEVs and TNF, particularly in HCM [32, 35, 81], as well as the consideration that EEV shedding is a secondary pathologic effect of TNF production, were the rationales behind a study of the anti-inflammatory molecule LMP-420 to indirectly inhibit EV production [82]. LMP-420 is a potent inhibitor of TNF synthesis. It was found that, when this molecule was added simultaneously with TNF to human brain microvascular ECs, EV release from these cells was reduced by up to 50 % compared to ECs treated with TNF alone [82]. Although this study was performed in the context of CM, the hypothesis that blocking EEV release would prevent the development of ECM or HCM was not tested in vivo. The significant reduction of EV release from TNF-activated ECs was observed in another in vitro inhibition study, where ECs were treated with pantethine before TNF activation [83]. Pantethine is a thiol provitamin known to directly prevent EV shedding by impeding phosphatidylserine translocation to the outer cell membrane leaflet, a process required for EV shedding [84]. In vivo experiments showed that mice treated with pantethine 24 h post-infection with P. berghei did not display any signs of CM, which was attributed to two crucial events: diminished platelet reactivity, and downregulated EV production [83]. Another compound, citicoline, was found to reduce EV production in human brain ECs in vitro, and significantly enhance survival of mice with CM when used in combination with artesunate [85]. Citicoline is a widely available dietary supplement that occurs naturally in eukaryotic cell membranes and plays a role in membrane stability. The prospect of the availability of EEV-inhibitory drugs as adjunctive therapies for the treatment or prevention of CM is encouraging yet improbable without an in-depth understanding of the pathogenic mechanisms of EEVs in malaria. Though complex, an experimental model with ex vivo, in vitro, and in vivo components may be essential to provide insights into a direct role of malaria induced EEVs in the pathogenesis of this neurological syndrome.

To adequately investigate the function of EEVs, specifically in plasma, they must be properly characterized in the midst of EVs from other cell sources. However, EEV characterization is problematic and poses a challenge for downstream EEV studies [75]. In the clinical study in Malawi, markedly elevated circulating plasma EEV levels in paediatric CM patients was the first indication that EVs may be a biomarker for malaria [32] (see above). However, EEVs as a predictor of fatality is uncertain due to conflicting data published on the EEV subpopulations. In Malawi, CD51:EEVs were characterized, and lower levels were found at the time of hospital admission in CM patients who died compared to those who survived [32]. In Cameroon, CD51:EEVs and CD105:EEVs were characterized. Higher titres of CD105:EEVs were recorded overall, as well as significantly higher titres at the time of hospital admission in patients who died compared to those who survived [33]. These are only 2 examples of the numerous EEV phenotypes, as parent endothelial cells carry multiple surface markers, including CD31, CD54, CD62E, CD106, CD144 and CD146 [81, 86]. While only CD144 and CD62E are exclusively expressed on ECs, activated monocytes/macrophages also express CD105 and CD51 [86]. Therefore, analysis of a combination of EEV markers is necessary to minimize ambiguity when assessing the origin and role of EEVs in malaria. A study of a murine model of ECM, in which CD144:EEVs were characterized, failed to show a significant difference in EEV titres between malaria-infected and uninfected mice, and the authors concluded that endothelial cells are not an important source of EVs in CM [39]. This data echoes earlier reports from similarly designed ECM models (also using CD144) that showed ECs account for less than a third of total plasma EVs [38]. However, it should be noted that CD144 is not an ideal marker for detecting EEVs [86]. As seen with other diseases [75, 86], in order to obtain reliable data on malaria induced EEVs, it is essential that future studies use multiple EC surface markers to improve sensitivity and specificity of detection.

Platelet derived EVs (PEVs)

Platelets, like endothelial cells, play an important role in the pathogenesis of CM. Studies have shown platelets to be involved both functionally (such as by releasing potent inflammatory cytokines) and physically (by accumulating in the brain and directly promoting iRBC cytoadherence) reviewed in [19, 41]. Abnormally low levels of platelets are known to occur in ECM [87] and HCM [88]. CM-associated thrombocytopenia remains poorly understood, nevertheless, through a series of in vitro and in vivo studies, it is known to involve caspase-dependent disintegration of platelets that results in the excessive shedding of PEVs in the plasma of P. berghei-infected mice [89]. Correspondingly, in humans, PEV levels have been found to be specifically and markedly elevated in thrombocytopenic patients presenting with CM [33]. Piguet and colleagues observed that treatment with the caspase-inhibitor, Z-Val-Ala-Dl-Asp-fluoro-methylketone (ZVAD-fmk) significantly reversed the inverse correlation between PEVs and platelets in the plasma of infected mice and increased the survival of the animals [89]. It is unknown whether survival in these mice was directly linked to the reduction in plasma PEVs. However, in HCM, plasma PEV levels, originally elevated in patients with acute disease, declined considerably at the time of their hospital discharge [33].

A clear relevance for PEVs has been described in various pathologic conditions, including those caused by infectious diseases [18]. In experimental and human CM, studies have shown that platelets account for more than 50 % of total plasma EVs [33, 38, 89]. Moreover, since platelets can bridge interactions between endothelial cells and iRBCs by providing the necessary surface adhesion molecules [90] that are also present and enriched on the surface of PEVs [18, 72], it was postulated that elevated circulating PEVs was an indication of their potential role in the pathogenesis of CM. This postulation was eloquently investigated in an in vitro model of HCM by Faille and colleagues [91]. Among their findings were that, in CM (1) in a dose-dependent fashion, PEVs preferentially bind to iRBCs rather than to uninfected RBCs, (2) binding between PEVs and iRBCs directly involves multiple platelet adhesion molecules (including PECAM-1 & GPIV) and P. falciparum erythrocyte membrane protein 1—PfEMP1, (3) PEVs adhere to the surface of iRBCs and human brain ECs but only translocate across the membrane of the latter, (4) PEVs can transfer PECAM-1 & GPIV to the surface of human brain ECs, and (5) iRBCs are more adherent to ECs in the presence of PEVs [91]. The results of this study provide an understanding of the potential role of PEVs in cell-cell interactions, cytoadherence and RBC sequestration in CM.

These findings have not been directly corroborated in vivo. However, in a clinical study in Cameroon, elevated PEV levels in children correlated with the severity of coma [33]. It may be argued that the correlation between PEV levels and coma severity observed in this study was due to increased sequestration of iRBCs in the brain microvasculature. This is in accordance with the ability of PEVs to increase iRBC cytoadherence to brain ECs, as observed in vitro by Faille and colleagues. Sequestration in vital organs other than the brain is an important element of the pathological picture of CM [92] and proadhesive PEVs may contribute to iRBC cytoadherence and sequestration in multiple organs. A property of PEVs that has been observed in physiological conditions [93] and under high shear stress [94] is the enhancement of thrombus formation at a substantially greater capacity than platelets. In CM, cerebrovascular thrombus formation is a pathological feature that commonly presents alongside cerebral sequestration [95, 96]. Thus, PEVs may be new players in CM vascular pathology. Indeed, the proadhesive and procoagulant properties of PEVs, and their potential involvement in CM pathogenesis, require critical investigation.

Red blood cell derived EVs (REVs)

RBCs accommodate Plasmodium spp. for the most part of their life cycle in the vertebrate host during which the parasite extensively modifies the structure and function of the erythrocyte. Plasmodium spp. synthesize and export numerous proteins that are presented on the RBC surface membrane [97]. Systemic inflammation is characteristic of CM and results when brain vascular endothelial cells and immune cells recognize parasite proteins on the surface of iRBCs or from ruptured iRBCs [14, 15, 49]. Like many other eukaryotic cells, mature RBCs constitutively shed EVs, more precisely microvesicles [98, 99]. Since microvesicles directly bud off plasma membranes, they may carry membrane-bound plasmodial molecules in malaria infection with immunogenic properties. EVs derived from Plasmodium-infected RBCs have been found to induce systemic inflammation in ECM [39].

Couper and colleagues performed studies on P. berghei-infected RBC derived EVs (pb-iREVs) where they found that pb-iREVs carried distinct parasite cargo and activated macrophages to release TNF in vitro, specifically through a TLR-4/MyD88 dependent pathway [39]. These pb-iREVs were much more potent activators of macrophages than viable P. berghei-infected RBCs, and the most immunogenic pb-iREVs were detected at the onset of clinical signs, which, in turn, correlated with peak pb-iREV levels. The authors of this study concluded that an accumulation of pb-iREVs with a distinct pro-inflammatory phenotype contribute to the development of severe malaria [39]. In-vitro studies of P. falciparum demonstrated the active uptake of P. falciparum-infected RBC derived EVs (pf-iREVs) by monocyte-derived macrophages. The pf-iREVs not only had a potent proinflammatory effect on macrophages, they also induced the expression of anti-inflammatory cytokines [100]. Mantel and colleagues showed that, while pf-iREVs are also capable of activating neutrophils, human monocytes are the main target immune cells [100].

Demonstrating with monocytes, iREVs have been implicated as central players in a novel mechanism of immune cell activation by plasmodial molecules. Nucleic acid-containing pf-iREVs are actively taken up by monocytes [101, 102]. Within monocytes, endogenous P. falciparum DNA cargo from these EVs is released into the cytosol, where it induces the secretion of type 1 interferons (IFN) and other cytokines in the cell via STING (Stimulator of Interferon Genes) activation [102]. STING is a cytosolic adapter protein that is activated by DNA-binding proteins and is essential for the production of type 1 IFN in innate immune cells [103, 104]. The mechanism described by Sisquella and colleagues was verified using imaging studies that clearly demonstrated the nuclear translocation of the activated transcription factor - interferon regulatory factor 3 (IRF3) in monocytes transfected with P. falciparum DNA [101]. IRF3 translocation is the final step in the STING-dependent signalling cascade before transcription of type 1 IFN genes [105]. How plasmodial DNA accesses the cytosolic milieu of immune cells to induce the STING-dependent innate immune response [106, 107] is poorly understood. Delivery of the DNA via haemozoin has been proposed [107], although there is controversy regarding haemozoin-DNA binding [108]. DNA delivery by iREVs offers an alternative explanation, in which case, the DNA is protected within an enclosed vesicle. Nevertheless, the role of EVs in presenting parasite DNA to immune cells in malaria requires a lot more research to answer important questions such as the mechanisms of nucleic acid loading into EVs, EV uptake by immune cells, and release of DNA cargo into the cytosol. Moreover, in depth investigation of the EV-DNA dependent stimulation of immune cells would provide insights into the pathogenesis of CM and the role of type 1 IFNs, since it has been shown that a disruption of the STING cascade significantly increases survival in knock-out P. berghei infected mice that are otherwise susceptible to CM [107].

There is evidence from a recent in vitro study suggesting that parasite derived EVs are more directly involved in the immunopathogenesis of CM. pf-iREVs activated human monocyte-derived microglia, resulting in an upregulation of TNF-α and simultaneous downregulation of IL-10 [109]. Microglia are the resident macrophages of the brain. Hence, this finding that pf-iREVs induce an immunomodulatory response in microglia is in line with that of Mantel and colleagues [100]. An imbalance in the inflammatory response that tips the scale toward excessive production of pro-inflammatory cytokines constitutes neuroinflammation [15]. Also characteristic of neuroinflammation is the activation of astrocytes, which are non-neuronal cells with core homeostatic functions in the brain [110]. Interestingly, pb-iREVs were rapidly taken up by astrocytes compared to iRBCs and, although these EVs were not directly implicated in activation of astrocytes, high levels of TNF were detected in co-cultures of astrocytes and P. berghei-iRBCs that likely contain iREVs [111]. Furthermore, in vitro studies showed that pf-iREVs induced pro-inflammatory cytokine release and VCAM1 expression in human ECs, but the most compulsive discovery was that they contain host-derived RNA-induced silencing complexes (Ago2-miRNA) that directly disrupt endothelial barrier functions [112].

Altogether, these findings implicate iREVs as facilitators of immunopathology and vascular dysfunction in malaria by virtue of the biomolecular cargo they carry. Several P. falciparum in vitro studies have comprehensively analysed the protein [100, 113, 114], nucleic acid [100, 102, 112, 115, 116], and lipid content of iREVs [117, 118] (Table 3). Independent proteomic analyses of EVs from rodent P. yoelii infections [54, 55] and plasma derived EVs from P. vivax infections of liver-chimeric humanized mice [56] have also been performed (Table 2).

Table 3 Malaria EV cargo derived from EVs of in vitro (cell cultured) iRBCs

The biology of malaria: novel features from an EV perspective

The immunopathobiology of malaria is primarily attributed to variant surface antigens (VSAs) that mediate ‘direct’ cell-cell interactions between parasite-infected RBCs and other host cells [13]. VSAs are the most studied feature of plasmodial virulence and biology [119] but much remains to be discerned about the complex nature of Plasmodium spp. and host-parasite interactions. Suffice to say, the growing malaria EV research over the last twenty years answers a call to fill in knowledge gaps by broadening the scope of investigation to other important components of malaria pathobiology. In various protozoan infections, parasite-derived or parasite-induced EVs are known to mediate ‘indirect’, long distance host-parasite and parasite-parasite interactions to promote virulence, immune evasion, survival, and transmission of invading pathogens, reviewed in [26, 120].

Using co-cultures of diverse parasite strains, Regev-Rudzki and colleagues demonstrated that ring stage pf-iREVs transfer episomal drug resistance genes from resistant to susceptible P. falciparum strains to enhance survival and gametocytogenesis under drug pressure [121]. This increase in sexual differentiation following exposure of asexual blood stage parasites to iREVs was also observed by another group, although not in the presence of drugs [100]. Rather, Mantel and colleagues observed that the rate of gametocytogenesis increased with increasing concentrations of iREVs in parasite cultures, implying this to be an inherent attribute. The favored uptake of iREVs by other iRBCs relative to uninfected RBCs [100] and the presence of regulatory microRNAs and plasmodial DNA in these EVs (see Table 3) substantiate the probability of a unique pathway by which Plasmodium spp. propagate their life cycle in natural infections. The implication of this pathway, should it occur in humans infected with malaria, is the potential of tackling drug resistance via novel strategies and developing drugs and vaccines that target iREVs to block the development of transmission stages of the parasite [121].

Contrary to increased sexual differentiation under drug pressure and a resultant low or controlled parasitaemia, P. falciparum responds to high density stress in vitro by releasing a subpopulation of EVs with differentially abundant parasite lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) that, in recipient parasites, induces apoptosis, thereby regulating parasite population [122]. Programmed cell death can be induced in human malarial infections [123] and evidence of EV-mediated PfLDH suicide signalling in vivo would have implications for antimalarial drug development.

Other iREV-bound parasite proteins—histidine rich factor (HRF), elongation factor 1α (Ef-1α) [124] and PfEMP1 [114]—have been implicated in immune evasion. When monocytes were treated with PfEMP1-carrying iREVs, genes involved in response to stress and cytokine stimulus, as well as response to defence, were not upregulated, whereas following treatment with PfEMP1-deficient iREVs, monocytes showed a significant upregulation of these genes [114]. In P. berghei rodent infection, compared to iREVs from HRF and Ef-1α knock-out mice, wild type sourced iREVs efficiently inhibited T cell proliferation in vitro and in vivo [118]. Over 3 decades ago, malaria antigens were reported to evade immune responses by inducing humoral and cell-mediated immunosuppression directly, albeit through poorly understood mechanisms [125, 126]. The work by Demarta-Gatsi et al. and Sampaio et al. paved the way in elucidating such mechanisms, as these studies suggest that iREVs are specifically loaded with virulent proteins that, upon delivery to immune cells, suppress the cells response to the parasite. Many more parasite proteins have been detected in iREVs [100, 113, 114, 124] and may work independently or in concert to suppress immune cell responses.

The presence of parasite biomolecules in iREVs is apparently purposeful and it has been proposed that malaria parasites direct cargo-specific loading of iREVs to exert effects in target cells for their benefit [102, 116]. This is likely, considering the extent to which malaria parasites modify the red blood cell [97]. However, neither the mechanism by which biomolecules are packaged into iREVs, nor the biogenesis of these EVs are known. Regev-Rudzki and colleagues have identified a protein - PfEMP1 trafficking protein 2 (PfPTP2) - that may be directly involved in iREV biogenesis. PfPTP2 functions in intercellular communication and preliminary data cautiously suggests that iREVs are derived from PfPTP2-coated vesicles that bud off Maurer’s clefts [121]. Mantel and colleagues agree that Maurer’s clefts are a central part of iREV biogenesis but argue, based on proteomics and live imaging data, that they are formed by blebbing directly from the RBC membrane [100]. In either case, involvement of the malaria parasites molecular and biological machinery cannot be excluded, especially since iREVs are produced from RBCs harbouring all parasite life stages [36].

As the malaria parasite matures within the RBC from ring stages, through trophozoites to schizonts, iREV production increases steadily [36, 100]. While schizont stages of P. falciparum may signal peak EV release from infected RBCs [100], it is the ring stages that signal specific loading of virulence factor PfEMP1 into EVs [114]. Moreover, the general distribution of proteins in EVs from iRBCs differs through the parasite’s development stages, implying a parasite driven mechanism [114] exists to generate subpopulations of effector EVs that promote stage-specific survival via different downstream signalling pathways in different host cells.

Malaria prevention and control: the influence of EVs in therapeutics and vaccine development

Vector control and targeted chemoprophylaxis are the main malaria prevention and control strategies [2]. While widespread drug resistance in malaria poses a major challenge for successful chemoprophylaxis and treatment, development of an effective vaccine has been hampered by antigenic variation and the overall complex life cycle of Plasmodium spp. Studies of iREVs have identified novel malaria pathways with potential drug targets and anti-malarial host-derived EV cargo, as well as EV-associated parasite molecules already under evaluation in vaccine trials. In fact, a few studies have demonstrated the potential of whole malaria derived EVs as vaccines.

In an experimental model of malaria, mice vaccinated with CpG-ODN adjuvanted EVs derived from non-lethal P. yoelii-infected reticulocytes mounted a parasite-specific humoral immune response [54] accompanied by the induction of effector memory T cells in the spleen [55]. Ultimately, these mice were immunized and protected from primary and subsequent lethal P. yoelii infections [54, 55]. Plasmodium yoelii-infected reticulocyte-derived EVs revealed over 70 Plasmodium proteins, including the immunogenic rhoptry proteins and merozoite surface protein 1 (MSP-1) [55]. Together, these studies suggest an antigen-presenting role for malaria-derived EVs and opened up a new avenue for malaria vaccine development [54, 55]. Similarly, in the recent study by Demarta-Gatsi and colleagues, malaria-naïve mice inoculated with iREVs from P. berghei infected mice survived an initial lethal infection and developed long-lasting immune memory that conferred protection against a second infection [124]. The authors noted a genetic component may have also determined survivability, since survival rates varied in the different mouse strains tested. EF-1α was identified as an immunogenic EV-associated protein. Mice immunized with recombinant EF‐1α also survived infection, however, parasite clearance required a longer period of time in these mice than in those immunized with EF‐1α-containing iREVs [124]. Although not clearly noted in the study, this likely implies a higher immunogenicity of iREVs and their suitability for controlled and targeted delivery of immunogens to induce a favourable immune response. Combined with biocompatibility and stability, these features are why the use of EVs as cancer vaccines and in drug delivery is gaining popularity over synthetic vesicle delivery systems [127, 128].

A number of earlier malaria vaccine studies focused on developing synthetic nanoparticles and microparticles for the delivery of parasite genes or proteins and a majority of the formulations included the biocompatible polymer poly (lactic-co-glycolic acid)—PLGA [129,130,131,132,133,134]. For the first time, iREVs from in vitro P. falciparum cultures and corresponding uninfected RBC derived EVs (uREVs), have been evaluated for their potential as natural antimalarial drug delivery systems [118]. Two lipophilic antimalarial drugs—atovaquone and tafenoquine—when loaded into iREVs and uREVs via simple co-incubation, inhibited the growth of P. falciparum in vitro more efficiently than when the parasites were exposed to free unencapsulated drugs [118].

Amongst other advantages of natural EVs, iREVs were bound by iRBCs and uRBCs with significantly greater avidity than uREVs, making this novel targeted drug delivery system a promising approach to improving antimalarial therapy and tackling drug resistance [118]. It also holds strong promise for the development of adjunctive immunotherapies for CM, since various studies have already shown that iREVs are actively taken up by endothelial cells [112], monocytes [100, 102, 114], glial cells [109, 111], T cells [124] and natural killer cells [135].

Uptake of iREVs by natural killer (NK) cells is particularly appealing for anti-malarial therapy and deserves thorough investigation. When pf-iREVs, NK cells and iRBCs were co-cultured, iREVs (in a dose-dependent fashion) altered the phenotype of a ‘non-responsive’ population of NK cells to a ‘responsive’ phenotype with concomitant reduction in parasitaemia [135]. NK cells are crucial for a protective innate immune response against blood stage parasites, as they are a primary source of IFN-γ required for controlling parasitaemia [136], and severe malaria in patients has been associated with a preponderance of ‘non-responding’ NK cells [135]. iREVs were implicated in stimulating NK cell activity via their RNA content. iREV associated RNA primed NK cells by activating MDA5 (melanoma differentiation associated gene 5), as indicated by significant upregulation of CD69 activation marker expression but poor stimulation of IFN-γ production [135]. MDA5 is a sensor for cytosolic foreign RNA, the activation of which triggers an innate immune response [137] crucial for determining the outcome of malaria infection [135]. Based on their observations, Ye and colleagues proposed that plasmodial RNA in EVs was directly released into the cytosol following fusion of the EV and NK cell membranes [135]. Direct contact between iRBCs and NK cells is a precondition for optimal IFN-γ production against Plasmodium [138] and data from this study further suggested that iREVs may activate NK cells indirectly by enhancing direct cell-cell contact between iRBCs and NK cells through the induction of high-affinity lymphocyte function-associated antigen 1 (LFA-1) [135, 139]. Identifying the RNA species in iREVs responsible for priming/activating NK cells would suggest natural EVs carrying specific functional RNA could be developed [127] as an NK cell-based antimalarial treatment [135].

On the other hand, functional human miR-451 and miR-140 complexes in EVs from uRBCs have been shown to negatively impact P. falciparum virulence [115]. Malaria infection signalled the release of EVs from uRBCs. When uREVs were taken up by iRBCs, EV-associated hmiR-451 and hmiR-140 downregulated the expression of genes encoding the virulence protein PfEMP1. Furthermore, iREVs, as well as uREVs, inhibited RBC invasion by merozoites [115]. The unfavourable effect of uREV hmiRNA complexes on parasite survival [115] contrasts the pathophysiologic effect of iREV hmiRNA complexes on host endothelial cells [112] mentioned earlier. This reiterates the complexities of malaria infection and the need for comprehensive studies, preferably using clinical P. falciparum isolates [113, 140] and rodent malaria parasites [141] to gain insights into the dynamic interaction between iREVs, uREVs and the vascular endothelium and the factors that may determine their pathogenic or protective effects in vivo. In the meantime, by virtue of their ability to hinder parasite survivability and control parasitaemia, host RBC-derived miRNAs hold promise as a novel malaria drug [115] that can also be delivered in EVs.

Malaria-derived EVs may hold potential beyond antimalarial therapeutics. In a murine model of cancer, intriguing pathological and immunohistochemical data showed the tumor-suppressive and anti-angiogenic properties of plasma derived EVs from P. yoelii-infected mice [142]. The authors concluded that certain miRNA species were enriched in plasma EVs consequent of P. yoelii infection and these miRNAs directly inhibited expression of an essential regulatory gene for growth and migration of vascular endothelial cells [142].

Conclusion

The EV network in malaria is complex, with extensive crosstalk at a molecular and cellular level among numerous host cells, within parasite populations, and between host cells and parasites. The correlation between circulating EVs and disease severity in natural infections, as well as protection against ECM by gene knockouts and pharmacological inhibition, supports the potential for EVs as biomarkers and suggests a pathogenic role in disease. A protective function of some EV populations has also been proposed. The many attributes of EVs are bestowed by their biomolecular cargo. Although the understanding of malaria EV biology is gradually advancing, there remains significant gaps in the knowledge of the distinct nature of EVs released by the different life stages of malaria parasites as well as how this may vary from one individual to another. More so, the mechanisms of specialised cargo loading, EV release and EV uptake are yet to be elucidated. This is essential for deeper understanding of the pathogenic and protective pathways of EVs, which in turn is necessary for the successful application of EVs as therapeutics and vaccines to intercept or promote these pathways. Furthermore, the notion that EVs may be used in the development of malaria vaccines requires substantially more scientific evidence. Technologies need to be developed that allow the manufacturing of homogenous EV populations and the purification of EVs from malaria cultures in large enough scale for vaccine production.

Nevertheless, as for understanding the involvement of cell specific EVs in malaria pathogenesis, host-parasite interactions, and the complex biology of P. falciparum and P. vivax, novel details have emerged from numerous studies over the last 2 decades. Much remains to be learned, and the field of malaria will likely see more research focusing on the characterization of distinct malaria EV populations, their biogenesis and fate, and critically investigating their role in disease.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Abbreviations

ABCA1:

ATP-binding cassette transporter A1

BBB:

Blood brain barrier

CM:

Cerebral malaria

EC:

Endothelial cells

ECM:

Experimental cerebral malaria

EEVs:

Endothelial cell-derived extracellular vesicles

Ef-1α:

Elongation factor 1α

EVs:

Extracellular vesicles

HCM:

Human cerebral malaria

HRF:

Histidine rich factor

iRBCs:

Infected red blood cells

iREV:

Infected red blood cell-derived extracellular vesicles

IRF3:

Interferon regulatory factor 3

ISEV:

International Society for Extracellular Vesicles

LDH:

Lactate dehydrogenase

LEVs:

Lymphocyte-derived extracellular vesicles

mEVs:

Medium extracellular vesicles

MEVs:

Monocyte-derived extracellular vesicles

MDA5:

Melanoma differentiation associated gene 5

MVB:

Multivesicular bodies

NK:

Natural Killer cells

pb-iREVs:

P. berghei-Infected RBC derived EVs

PEVs:

Platelet-derived extracellular vesicles

PfEMP1:

P. falciparum Erythrocyte membrane protein 1

PfPTP2:

PfEMP1 trafficking protein 2

pf-iREVs:

P. falciparum-Infected RBC derived EVs

PS:

Phosphatidylserine

RBCs:

Red blood cells

REVs:

Red blood cell-derived extracellular vesicles

sEVs:

Small extracellular vesicles

STING:

Stimulator of Interferon Genes

TNF:

Tumor necrosis factor

uREVs:

Uninfected red blood cell-derived EVs

References

  1. 1.

    Cox FE. History of the discovery of the malaria parasites and their vectors. Parasit Vectors. 2010;3:5.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    WHO. World Malaria Report 2019. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Wassmer SC, Grau GER. Severe malaria: what’s new on the pathogenesis front? Int J Parasitol. 2017;47:145–52.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Luzolo AL, Ngoyi DM. Cerebral malaria. Brain Res Bull. 2019;145:53–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Ahmed MA, Cox-Singh J. Plasmodium knowlesi - an emerging pathogen. ISBT Science Series. 2015;10:134–40.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Grigg MJ, William T, Barber BE, Rajahram GS, Menon J, Schimann E, et al. Age-related clinical spectrum of Plasmodium knowlesi malaria and predictors of severity. Clin Infect Dis. 2018;67:350–9.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Tanwar GS, Khatri PC, Sengar GS, Kochar A, Kochar SK, Middha S, et al. Clinical profiles of 13 children with Plasmodium vivax cerebral malaria. Ann Trop Paediat. 2011;31:351–6.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Kochar DK, Das A, Kochar A, Middha S, Acharya J, Tanwar GS, et al. A prospective study on adult patients of severe malaria caused by Plasmodium falciparum, Plasmodium vivax and mixed infection from Bikaner, northwest India. J Vector Borne Dis. 2014;51:200–10.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Akhlaq A, Ghanchi N, Usmani B, Shahzad R, Rahim A, Wasay M, et al. Neurological complications in patients with Plasmodium vivax malaria from Karachi, Pakistan. J R Coll Physicians Edinb. 2018;48:198–201.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Mukhtar MM, Eisawi OA, Amanfo SA, Elamin EM, Imam ZS, Osman FM, et al. Plasmodium vivax cerebral malaria in an adult patient in Sudan. Malar J. 2019;18:316.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Rahimi B, Thakkinstian A, White NJ, Sirivichayakul C, Dondorp AM, Chokejindachai W. Severe vivax malaria: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical studies since 1900. Malar J. 2014;13:481.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Storm J, Jespersen JS, Seydel KB, Szestak T, Mbewe M, Chisala NV, et al. Cerebral malaria is associated with differential cytoadherence to brain endothelial cells. EMBO Mol Med. 2019;11:e9164.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Lee W-C, Russell B, Rénia L. Sticking for a cause: the falciparum malaria parasites cytoadherence paradigm. Front Immunol. 2019;10:1.

    Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Pais TF, Penha-Goncalves C. Brain endothelium: the “innate immunity response hypothesis” in cerebral malaria pathogenesis. Front Immunol. 2019;9:3100.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Josefine Dunst FKaKM. Cytokines and chemokines in cerebral malaria pathogenesis. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2017;7:324.

    Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Dayananda KK, Achur RN, Gowda DC. Epidemiology, drug resistance, and pathophysiology of Plasmodium vivax malaria. J Vector Borne Dis. 2018;55:1–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Campos FM, Franklin BS, Teixeira-Carvalho A, Filho AL, De Paula SC, Fontes CJ, et al. Augmented plasma microparticles during acute Plasmodium vivax infection. Malar J. 2010;9:327.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Coltel N, Combes V, Wassmer SC, Chimini G, Grau GE. Cell vesiculation and immunopathology: implications in cerebral malaria. Microbes Infect. 2006;8:2305–16.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Combes V, Coltel N, Faille D, Wassmer SC, Grau GE. Cerebral malaria: role of microparticles and platelets in alterations of the blood–brain barrier. Int J Parasitol. 2006;36:541–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Wolf P. The nature and significance of platelet products in human plasma. Br J Haematol. 1967;13:269–88.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Chargaff E, West R. The biological significance of the thromboplastic protein of blood. J Biol Chem. 1946;166:189–97.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Rak J. Microparticles in cancer. Semin Thromb Hemost. 2010;36:888–906.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Yáñez-Mó M, Siljander PRM, Andreu Z, Bedina Zavec A, Borràs FE, Buzas EI, et al. Biological properties of extracellular vesicles and their physiological functions. J Extracell Vesicles. 2015;4:27066.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Yuana Y, Sturk A, Nieuwland R. Extracellular vesicles in physiological and pathological conditions. Blood Rev. 2013;27:31–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Mardahl M, Borup A, Nejsum P. A new level of complexity in parasite-host interaction: the role of extracellular vesicles. Adv Parasitol. 2019;104:39–112.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Olajide JS, Cai J. Perils and promises of pathogenic protozoan extracellular vesicles. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2020;10:371.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Szempruch AJ, Dennison L, Kieft R, Harrington JM, Hajduk SL. Sending a message: extracellular vesicles of pathogenic protozoan parasites. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2016;14:669–75.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Théry C, Witwer KW, Aikawa E, Alcaraz MJ, Anderson JD, Andriantsitohaina R, et al. Minimal information for studies of extracellular vesicles 2018 (MISEV2018): a position statement of the International Society for Extracellular Vesicles and update of the MISEV2014 guidelines. J Extracell Vesicles. 2018;7:1535750.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Cocucci E, Meldolesi J. Ectosomes and exosomes: shedding the confusion between extracellular vesicles. Trends Cell Biol. 2015;25:364–72.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Mantel PY, Marti M. The role of extracellular vesicles in Plasmodium and other protozoan parasites. Cell Microbiol. 2014;16:344–54.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Sampaio NG, Cheng L, Eriksson EM. The role of extracellular vesicles in malaria biology and pathogenesis. Malar J. 2017;16:245.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Combes V, Taylor TE, Juhan-Vague I, Mège J-L, Mwenechanya J, Tembo M, et al. Circulating endothelial microparticles in Malawian children with severe falciparum malaria complicated with coma. JAMA. 2004;291:2542–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Mfonkeu JBP, Gouado I, Kuate HF, Zambou O, Zollo PHA, Grau GER, et al. Elevated cell-specific microparticles are a biological marker for cerebral dysfunctions in human severe malaria. PLoS One. 2010;5:e13415.

    Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Sahu U, Mohapatra BN, Kar SK, Ranjit M. Promoter polymorphisms in the ATP binding cassette transporter gene influence production of cell-derived microparticles and are highly associated with susceptibility to severe malaria in humans. Infect Immun. 2013;81:1287–94.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Sahu U, Sahoo PK, Kar SK, Mohapatra BN, Ranjit M. Association of TNF level with production of circulating cellular microparticles during clinical manifestation of human cerebral malaria. Hum Immunol. 2013;74:713–21.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Nantakomol D, Dondorp AM, Krudsood S, Udomsangpetch R, Pattanapanyasat K, Combes V, et al. Circulating red cell-derived microparticles in human malaria. J Infect Dis. 2011;203:700–6.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Van Der Heyde HC, Gramaglia I, Sun G, Woods C. Platelet depletion by anti-CD41 (αIIb) mAb injection early but not late in the course of disease protects against Plasmodium berghei pathogenesis by altering the levels of pathogenic cytokines. Blood. 2005;105:1956–63.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Combes V, Coltel N, Alibert M, Van Eck M, Raymond C, Juhan-Vague I, et al. ABCA1 gene deletion protects against cerebral malaria. Am J Pathol. 2005;166:295–302.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Couper KN, Barnes T, Hafalla JCR, Combes V, Ryffel B, Secher T, et al. Parasite-derived plasma microparticles contribute significantly to malaria infection-induced inflammation through potent macrophage stimulation. PLoS Pathog. 2010;6:e1000744.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    El-Assaad F, Wheway J, Hunt NH, Grau GER, Combes V. Production, fate and pathogenicity of plasma microparticles in murine cerebral malaria. PLoS Pathog. 2014;10:e1003839

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Combes V, El-Assaad F, Faille D, Jambou R, Hunt NH, Grau GER. Microvesiculation and cell interactions at the brain–endothelial interface in cerebral malaria pathogenesis. Prog Neurobiol. 2010;91:140–51.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Antwi-Baffour S, Malibha-Pinchbeck M, Stratton D, Jorfi S, Lange S, Inal J. Plasma mEV levels in Ghanain malaria patients with low parasitaemia are higher than those of healthy controls, raising the potential for parasite markers in mEVs as diagnostic targets. J Extracell Vesicles. 2020;9:1697124.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Coumans FA, Brisson AR, Buzas EI, Dignat-George F, Drees EE, El-Andaloussi S, et al. Methodological guidelines to study extracellular vesicles. Circ Res. 2017;120:1632–48.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Kowal J, Arras G, Colombo M, Jouve M, Morath JP, Primdal-Bengtson B, et al. Proteomic comparison defines novel markers to characterize heterogeneous populations of extracellular vesicle subtypes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2016;113:E968-E77.

    Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Szatanek R, Baj-Krzyworzeka M, Zimoch J, Lekka M, Siedlar M, Baran J. The methods of choice for extracellular vesicles (EVs) characterization. Int J Mol Sci. 2017;18:1153.

    PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Moro L, Bardaji A, Macete E, Barrios D, Morales-Prieto DM, Espana C, et al. Placental microparticles and microRNAs in pregnant women with Plasmodium falciparum or HIV infection. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0146361.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Hamon Y, Broccardo C, Chambenoit O, Luciani M-F, Toti F, Chaslin S, et al. ABC1 promotes engulfment of apoptotic cells and transbilayer redistribution of phosphatidylserine. Nat Cell Biol. 2000;2:399–406.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Boadu E, Francis GA. The role of vesicular transport in ABCA1-dependent lipid efflux and its connection with NPC pathways. J Mol Med (Berl). 2006;84:266–75.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Wassmer SC, Taylor TE, Rathod PK, Mishra SK, Mohanty S, Arevalo-Herrera M, et al. Investigating the pathogenesis of severe malaria: a multidisciplinary and cross-geographical approach. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2015;93 Suppl 3:42–56.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Lu Z, Luo Z, Jia A, Yu L, Muhammad I, Zeng W, et al. Associations of the ABCA1 gene polymorphisms with plasma lipid levels: a meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018;97:e13521.

    PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Santamarina-Fojo S, Peterson K, Knapper C, Qiu Y, Freeman L, Cheng J-F, et al. Complete genomic sequence of the human ABCA1 gene: analysis of the human and mouse ATP-binding cassette A promoter. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000;97:7987–92.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Puddu P, Puddu GM, Cravero E, Muscari S, Muscari A. The involvement of circulating microparticles in inflammation, coagulation and cardiovascular diseases. Can J Cardiol 2010;26:140–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Moxon CA, Wassmer SC, Milner DA, Jr, Chisala NV, Taylor TE, Seydel KB, et al. Loss of endothelial protein C receptors links coagulation and inflammation to parasite sequestration in cerebral malaria in African children. Blood. 2013;122:842–51.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Martin-Jaular L, Nakayasu ES, Ferrer M, Almeida IC, Del Portillo HA. Exosomes from Plasmodium yoelii-infected reticulocytes protect mice from lethal infections. PLoS One. 2011;6:e26588.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Martín-Jaular L, De Menezes-Neto A, Monguió-Tortajada M, Elizalde-Torrent A, Díaz-Varela M, Fernández-Becerra C, et al. Spleen-dependent immune protection elicited by CpG adjuvanted reticulocyte-derived exosomes from malaria infection is associated with changes in T cell subsets’ distribution. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2016;4:131.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Gualdron-Lopez M, Flannery EL, Kangwanrangsan N, Chuenchob V, Fernandez-Orth D, Segui-Barber J, et al. Characterization of Plasmodium vivax proteins in plasma-derived exosomes from malaria-infected liver-chimeric humanized mice. Front Microbiol. 2018;9:1271.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Tiberti N, Latham SL, Bush S, Cohen A, Opoka RO, John CC, et al. Exploring experimental cerebral malaria pathogenesis through the characterisation of host-derived plasma microparticle protein content. Sci Rep. 2016;6:37871.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Cohen A, Zinger A, Tiberti N, Grau GER, Combes V. Differential plasma microvesicle and brain profiles of microRNA in experimental cerebral malaria. Malar J. 2018;17:192.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Toda H, Diaz-Varela M, Segui-Barber J, Roobsoong W, Baro B, Garcia-Silva S, et al. Plasma-derived extracellular vesicles from Plasmodium vivax patients signal spleen fibroblasts via NF-kB facilitating parasite cytoadherence. Nat Commun. 2020;11:2761.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Ketprasit N, Cheng IS, Deutsch F, Tran N, Imwong M, Combes V, et al. The characterization of extracellular vesicles-derived microRNAs in Thai malaria patients. Malar J. 2020;19:285

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Antwi-Baffour S, Adjei JK, Agyemang-Yeboah F, Annani-Akollor M, Kyeremeh R, Asare GA, et al. Proteomic analysis of microparticles isolated from malaria positive blood samples. Proteome Sci. 2016;15:5

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Murray RZ, Kay JG, Sangermani DG, Stow JL. A role for the phagosome in cytokine secretion. Science. 2005;310:1492–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Bayer-Santos E, Marini MM, da Silveira JF. Non-coding RNAs in host-pathogen interactions: subversion of mammalian cell functions by protozoan parasites. Front Microbiol. 2017;8:474.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Walzer KA, Chi JT. Trans-kingdom small RNA transfer during host-pathogen interactions: the case of P-falciparum and erythrocytes. RNA Biol. 2017;14:442–9.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    El-Assaad F, Hempel C, Combes V, Mitchell AJ, Ball HJ, Kurtzhals JA, et al. Differential microRNA expression in experimental cerebral and noncerebral malaria. Infect Immun. 2011;79:2379–84.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Martin-Alonso A, Cohen A, Quispe-Ricalde MA, Foronda P, Benito A, Berzosa P, et al. Differentially expressed microRNAs in experimental cerebral malaria and their involvement in endocytosis, adherens junctions, FoxO and TGF-β signalling pathways. Sci Rep. 2018;8:11277.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Barker KR, Lu Z, Kim H, Zheng Y, Chen J, Conroy AL, et al. miR-155 modifies inflammation, endothelial activation and blood-brain barrier dysfunction in cerebral malaria. Mol Med. 2017;23:24–33.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Barber BE, William T, Grigg MJ, Parameswaran U, Piera KA, Price RN, et al. Parasite biomass-related inflammation, endothelial activation, microvascular dysfunction and disease severity in vivax malaria. PLoS Pathog. 2015;11:e1004558.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Carvalho BO, Lopes SC, Nogueira PA, Orlandi PP, Bargieri DY, Blanco YC, et al. On the cytoadhesion of Plasmodium vivax-infected erythrocytes. J Infect Dis. 2010;202:638–47.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Raposo G, Stoorvogel W. Extracellular vesicles: exosomes, microvesicles, and friends. J Cell Biol. 2013;200:373–83.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Inami N, Iwasaka T, Nomura S. Differences in functional roles between activated platelets and platelet-derived microparticles. Thromb Haemost. 2007;98:1143–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Sinauridze EI, Kireev DA, Popenko NY, Pichugin AV, Panteleev MA, Krymskaya OV, et al. Platelet microparticle membranes have 50- to 100-fold higher specific procoagulant activity than activated platelets. Thromb Haemost. 2007;97:425–34.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Veerman RE, Güçlüler Akpinar G, Eldh M, Gabrielsson S. Immune cell-derived extracellular vesicles—functions and therapeutic applications. Trends Mol Med. 2019;25:382–94.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Burnouf T, Goubran HA, Chou M-L, Devos D, Radosevic M. Platelet microparticles: Detection and assessment of their paradoxical functional roles in disease and regenerative medicine. Blood Rev. 2014;28:155–66.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Hromada C, Mühleder S, Grillari J, Redl H, Holnthoner W. Endothelial extracellular vesicles—promises and challenges. Front Physiol. 2017;8:275.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Jansen F, Nickenig G, Werner N. Extracellular vesicles in cardiovascular disease potential applications in diagnosis, prognosis, and epidemiology. Circ Res. 2017;120:1649–57.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    Turner GD, Morrison H, Jones M, Davis TM, Looareesuwan S, Buley ID, et al. An immunohistochemical study of the pathology of fatal malaria. Evidence for widespread endothelial activation and a potential role for intercellular adhesion molecule-1 in cerebral sequestration. Am J Pathol. 1994;145:1057–69.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  78. 78.

    Combes V, Simon A-C, Grau G-E, Arnoux D, Camoin L, Sabatier F, et al. In vitro generation of endothelial microparticles and possible prothrombotic activity in patients with lupus anticoagulant. J Clin Invest. 1999;104:93–102.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  79. 79.

    Kwiatkowski D, Sambou I, Twumasi P, Greenwood BM, Hill AVS, Manogue KR, et al. TNF concentration in fatal cerebral, non-fatal cerebral, and uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria. Lancet. 1990;336:1201–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  80. 80.

    Mandala WL, Msefula CL, Gondwe EN, Drayson MT, Molyneux ME, Maclennan CA. Cytokine profiles in Malawian children presenting with uncomplicated malaria, severe malarial anemia, and cerebral malaria. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2017;24:e00533-16.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  81. 81.

    Wassmer SC, Moxon CA, Taylor T, Grau GE, Molyneux ME, Craig AG. Vascular endothelial cells cultured from patients with cerebral or uncomplicated malaria exhibit differential reactivity to TNF. Cell Microbiol. 2011;13:198–209.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  82. 82.

    Wassmer SC, Cianciolo GJ, Combes V, Grau GE. Inhibition of endothelial activation: a new way to treat cerebral malaria? PLoS Med. 2005;2:e245.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  83. 83.

    Penet MF, Abou-Hamdan M, Coltel N, Cornille E, Grau GE, De Reggi M, et al. Protection against cerebral malaria by the low-molecular-weight thiol pantethine. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;105:1321–6.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  84. 84.

    Catalano M, O’Driscoll L. Inhibiting extracellular vesicles formation and release: a review of EV inhibitors. J Extracell Vesicles. 2020;1:91703244.

    Google Scholar 

  85. 85.

    El-Assaad F, Combes V, Grau GER, Jambou R. Potential efficacy of citicoline as adjunct therapy in treatment of cerebral malaria. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2014;58:602–5.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  86. 86.

    Dignat-George F, Boulanger CM. The many faces of endothelial microparticles. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2011;31:27–33.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  87. 87.

    Grau GE, Tacchini-Cottier F, Vesin C, Milon G, Lou JN, Piguet PF, et al. TNF-induced microvascular pathology: active role for platelets and importance of the LFA-1/ICAM-1 interaction. Eur Cytokine Netw. 1993;4:415–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  88. 88.

    Grau GE, Mackenzie CD, Carr RA, Redard M, Pizzolato G, Allasia C, et al. Platelet accumulation in brain microvessels in fatal pediatric cerebral malaria. J Infect Dis. 2003;187:461–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. 89.

    Piguet PF, Kan CD, Vesin C. Thrombocytopenia in an animal model of malaria is associated with an increased caspase-mediated death of thrombocytes. Apoptosis. 2002;7:91–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  90. 90.

    Wassmer SC, Lépolard C, Traoré B, Pouvelle B, Gysin J, Georges. Platelets reorient Plasmodium falciparum–infected erythrocyte cytoadhesion to activated endothelial cells. J Infect Dis. 2004;189:180–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  91. 91.

    Faille D, Combes V, Mitchell AJ, Fontaine A, Juhan-Vague I, Alessi MC, et al. Platelet microparticles: a new player in malaria parasite cytoadherence to human brain endothelium. FASEB J. 2009;23:3449–58.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  92. 92.

    Seydel KB, Milner DA, Jr., Kamiza SB, Molyneux ME, Taylor TE. The distribution and intensity of parasite sequestration in comatose Malawian children. J Infect Dis. 2006;194:208–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. 93.

    Nieuwland R, van der Pol E, Gardiner C, Sturk A. Platelet-derived microparticles. In: Platelets. Michelson A, Ed. Chapter 22:453-67. Academic Press. 2013.

  94. 94.

    Reininger AJ, Heijnen HFG, Schumann H, Specht HM, Schramm W, Ruggeri ZM. Mechanism of platelet adhesion to von Willebrand factor and microparticle formation under high shear stress. Blood. 2006;107:3537–45.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  95. 95.

    Dorovini-Zis K, Schmidt K, Huynh H, Fu W, Whitten RO, Milner D, et al. The neuropathology of fatal cerebral malaria in Malawian children. Am J Pathol. 2011;178:2146–58.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  96. 96.

    Taylor TE, Fu WJ, Carr RA, Whitten RO, Mueller JS, Fosiko NG, et al. Differentiating the pathologies of cerebral malaria by postmortem parasite counts. Nat Med. 2004;10:143–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  97. 97.

    Gilson PR, Chisholm SA, Crabb BS, De Koning-Ward TF. Host cell remodelling in malaria parasites: a new pool of potential drug targets. Int J Parasitol. 2017;47:119–27.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  98. 98.

    Willekens F, Werre J, Groenen-Döpp Y, Roerdinkholder-Stoelwinder B, Pauw B, Bosman G. Erythrocyte vesiculation: a self-protective mechanism? Br J Haematol. 2008;141:549–56.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  99. 99.

    Kuo WP, Tigges JC, Toxavidis V, Ghiran I. Red blood cells: a source of extracellular vesicles. Methods Mol Biol; 2017;1660:15–22.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  100. 100.

    Mantel P-Y, Anh, Goldowitz I, Potashnikova D, Hamza B, Vorobjev I, et al. Malaria-infected erythrocyte-derived microvesicles mediate cellular communication within the parasite population and with the host immune system. Cell Host Microbe. 2013;13:521–34.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  101. 101.

    Ofir-Birin Y, Abou Karam P, Rudik A, Giladi T, Porat Z, Regev-Rudzki N. Monitoring extracellular vesicle cargo active uptake by imaging flow cytometry. Front Immunol. 2018;9:1011.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  102. 102.

    Sisquella X, Ofir-Birin Y, Pimentel MA, Cheng L, Abou Karam P, Sampaio NG, et al. Malaria parasite DNA-harbouring vesicles activate cytosolic immune sensors. Nat Commun. 2017;8:1985.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  103. 103.

    Ishikawa H, Ma Z, Barber GN. STING regulates intracellular DNA-mediated, type I interferon-dependent innate immunity. Nature. 2009;461:788–92.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  104. 104.

    Diner EJ, Burdette DL, Wilson SC, Monroe KM, Kellenberger CA, Hyodo M, et al. The innate immune DNA sensor cGAS produces a noncanonical cyclic dinucleotide that activates human STING. Cell Rep. 2013;3:1355–61.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  105. 105.

    Tanaka Y, Chen ZJ. STING specifies IRF3 phosphorylation by TBK1 in the cytosolic DNA signaling pathway. Sci Signal. 2012;5:ra20.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  106. 106.

    Yu X, Cai B, Wang M, Tan P, Ding X, Wu J, et al. Cross-regulation of two Type I interferon signaling pathways in plasmacytoid dendritic cells controls anti-malaria immunity and host mortality. Immunity. 2016;45:1093–107.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  107. 107.

    Sharma S, Rosane, Kalantari P, Parroche P, Goutagny N, Jiang Z, et al. Innate immune recognition of an AT-rich stem-loop DNA motif in the Plasmodium falciparum genome. Immunity. 2011;35:194–207.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  108. 108.

    Olivier M, Van Den Ham K, Shio MT, Kassa FA, Fougeray S. Malarial pigment hemozoin and the innate inflammatory response. Front Immunol. 2014;5:25.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  109. 109.

    Mbagwu SI, Lannes N, Walch M, Filgueira L, Mantel PY. Human microglia respond to malaria-induced extracellular vesicles. Pathogens. 2020;9:21.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  110. 110.

    Goshi N, Morgan RK, Lein PJ, Seker E. A primary neural cell culture model to study neuron, astrocyte, and microglia interactions in neuroinflammation. J Neuroinflammation. 2020;17:155.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  111. 111.

    Shrivastava SK, Dalko E, Delcroix-Genete D, Herbert F, Cazenave P-A, Pied S. Uptake of parasite-derived vesicles by astrocytes and microglial phagocytosis of infected erythrocytes may drive neuroinflammation in cerebral malaria. Glia. 2017;65:75–92.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  112. 112.

    Mantel PY, Hjelmqvist D, Walch M, Kharoubi-Hess S, Nilsson S, Ravel D, et al. Infected erythrocyte-derived extracellular vesicles alter vascular function via regulatory Ago2-miRNA complexes in malaria. Nat Commun. 2016;7:12727.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  113. 113.

    Abdi A, Yu L, Goulding D, Rono M, Bejon P, Choudhary J, et al. Proteomic analysis of extracellular vesicles from a Plasmodium falciparum Kenyan clinical isolate defines a core parasite secretome Wellcome Open Res. 2017;2:50.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  114. 114.

    Sampaio NG, Emery SJ, Garnham AL, Tan QY, Sisquella X, Pimentel MA, et al. Extracellular vesicles from early stage Plasmodium falciparum-infected red blood cells contain PfEMP1 and induce transcriptional changes in human monocytes. Cell Microbiol. 2018;20:e12822.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  115. 115.

    Wang ZS, Xi JM, Hao X, Deng WW, Liu J, Wei CY, et al. Red blood cells release microparticles containing human argonaute 2 and miRNAs to target genes of Plasmodium falciparum. Emerg Microbes Infect. 2017;6:e75.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  116. 116.

    Babatunde KA, Mbagwu S, Hernández-Castañeda MA, Adapa SR, Walch M, Filgueira L, et al. Malaria infected red blood cells release small regulatory RNAs through extracellular vesicles. Sci Rep. 2018;8:884.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  117. 117.

    Gulati S, Eric, Kelly, Robin, Jayabalasingham B, Zhou B, et al. Profiling the essential nature of lipid metabolism in asexual blood and gametocyte stages of Plasmodium falciparum. Cell Host Microbe. 2015;18:371–81.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  118. 118.

    Borgheti-Cardoso LN, Kooijmans SAA, Chamorro LG, Biosca A, Lantero E, Ramírez M, et al. Extracellular vesicles derived from Plasmodium-infected and non-infected red blood cells as targeted drug delivery vehicles. Int J Pharm. 2020;587:119627.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  119. 119.

    Acharya P, Garg M, Kumar P, Munjal A, Raja KD. Host-parasite interactions in human malaria: clinical implications of basic research. Front Microbiol. 2017;8:889.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  120. 120.

    Roditi I. The languages of parasite communication. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 2016;208:16–22.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  121. 121.

    Regev-Rudzki N, Danny, Teresa, Sisquella X, Bradley, Rug M, et al. Cell-cell communication between malaria-infected red blood cells via exosome-like vesicles. Cell. 2013;153:1120–33.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  122. 122.

    Correa R, Coronado L, Caballero Z, Faral P, Robello C, Spadafora C. Extracellular vesicles carrying lactate dehydrogenase induce suicide in increased population density of Plasmodium falciparum in vitro. Sci Rep. 2019;9:5042.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  123. 123.

    Raj DK, Das Mohapatra A, Jnawali A, Zuromski J, Jha A, Cham-Kpu G, et al. Anti-PfGARP activates programmed cell death of parasites and reduces severe malaria. Nature. 2020;582:104–108.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  124. 124.

    Demarta-Gatsi C, Rivkin A, Di Bartolo V, Peronet R, Ding S, Commere PH, et al. Histamine releasing factor and elongation factor 1 alpha secreted via malaria parasites extracellular vesicles promote immune evasion by inhibiting specific T cell responses. Cell Microbiol. 2019;21:e13021.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  125. 125.

    Srour EF, SEGRE M, SEGRE D. Impairment of T-helper function by a Plasmodium berghei-derived immunosuppressive factor 1. J Protozool. 1988;35:441–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  126. 126.

    Riley E, Jobe O, Blackman M, Whittle H, Greenwood B. Plasmodium falciparum schizont sonic extract suppress Iymphoproliferative responses to mitogens and antigens in malaria-immune adults. Infect Immun. 1989;57:3181–8.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  127. 127.

    Yang Y, Hong Y, Cho E, Kim GB, Kim I-S. Extracellular vesicles as a platform for membrane-associated therapeutic protein delivery. J Extracell Vesicles. 2018;7:1440131.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  128. 128.

    Lee H, Park H, Yu H, Na K, Oh K, Lee E. Dendritic cell-targeted pH-responsive extracellular vesicles for anticancer vaccination. Pharmaceutics. 2019;11:54.

    PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  129. 129.

    Liu S, Danquah MK, Forde GM, Ma C, Wang L, Coppel R. Microparticle-mediated gene delivery for the enhanced expression of a 19-kDa fragment of merozoite surface protein 1 of Plasmodium falciparum. Biotechnol Prog. 2010;26:257–62.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  130. 130.

    Bhat AA, Seth RK, Kumar S, Ali R, Mohan T, Biswas S, et al. Induction of cell-mediated immune responses to peptide antigens of P. vivax in microparticles using intranasal immunization. Immunol Invest. 2010;39:483–99.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  131. 131.

    Bhat AA, Seth RK, Babu J, Biswas S, Rao DN. Induction of mucosal and systemic humoral immune responses in murine system by intranasal immunization with peptide antigens of P. vivax and CpG oligodeoxynucleotide (ODN) in microparticle delivery. Int Immunopharmacol. 2009;9:1197–208.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  132. 132.

    Moon JJ, Suh H, Polhemus ME, Ockenhouse CF, Yadava A, Irvine DJ. Antigen-displaying lipid-enveloped PLGA nanoparticles as delivery agents for a Plasmodium vivax malaria vaccine. PLoS One. 2012;7:e31472.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  133. 133.

    Moon JJ, Suh H, Li AV, Ockenhouse CF, Yadava A, Irvine DJ. Enhancing humoral responses to a malaria antigen with nanoparticle vaccines that expand Tfh cells and promote germinal center induction. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2012;109:1080–5.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  134. 134.

    Dinglasan RR, Armistead JS, Nyland JF, Jiang X, Mao HQ. Single-DOSE MICROPARTICLE DELIVERY OF A MALARIA TRANSMISSION- BLOCKING VACCINE ELICITS A LONG-LASTING FUNCTIONAL ANTIBODY RESPONSE. Curr Mol Med. 2013;13:479–87.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  135. 135.

    Ye WJ, Chew M, Hou J, Lai F, Leopold SJ, Loo HL, et al. Microvesicles from malaria-infected red blood cells activate natural killer cells via MDA5 pathway. PLoS Pathog. 2018;14:e1007298.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  136. 136.

    Burrack KS, Hart GT, Hamilton SE. Contributions of natural killer cells to the immune response against Plasmodium. Malar J. 2019;18:321.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  137. 137.

    Zevini A, Olagnier D, Hiscott J. Crosstalk between cytoplasmic RIG-I and STING sensing pathways. Trends Immunol. 2017;38:194–205.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  138. 138.

    Artavanis-Tsakonas K, Eleme K, McQueen KL, Cheng NW, Parham P, Davis DM, et al. Activation of a subset of human NK cells upon contact with Plasmodium falciparum-infected erythrocytes. J Immunol. 2003;171:5396–405.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  139. 139.

    Walling BL, Kim M. LFA-1 in T cell migration and differentiation. Front Immunol. 2018;9:952.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  140. 140.

    Mwangi SJ, Gwela A, Mwikali K, Bargul JL, Nduati EW, Ndungu FM, et al. Impact of Plasmodium falciparum small-sized extracellular vesicles on host peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Wellcome Open Res. 2020;5:197.

    Google Scholar 

  141. 141.

    De Niz M, Heussler VT. Rodent malaria models: insights into human disease and parasite biology. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2018;46:93–101.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  142. 142.

    Yang Y, Liu Q, Lu J, Adah D, Yu S, Zhao S, et al. Exosomes from Plasmodium-infected hosts inhibit tumor angiogenesis in a murine Lewis lung cancer model. Oncogenesis. 2017;6:e351.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This work was supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

TO and PR designed the scope of the review; TO wrote the draft; TO and PR edited the manuscript. Both authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Petra Rohrbach.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Opadokun, T., Rohrbach, P. Extracellular vesicles in malaria: an agglomeration of two decades of research. Malar J 20, 442 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-021-03969-8

Download citation

Keywords

  • Extracellular vesicles
  • Exosomes
  • Microvesicles
  • Plasmodium
  • Malaria
  • Biomarkers
  • Pathogenesis